[討論] M.Barnes 才是勇士sf的最佳解吧
勇士在少了KD後 先遭遇了一波小亂流
風向開始倒向KD才是真一哥
結果最近拉出一波連勝之後風向又轉成KD限制了浪花(這風轉的我都暈了)
但先把KD丟在一邊 咩棒的打法是不是最適合勇士啊
看他跟其他人的配合 沒常看球的人還以為他已經在這隻球隊3.5年了
要防守有防守 傳球能力也不差 外線偶爾來個冷箭 起衝突時也不用動手 站在後面當保鑣
對面先軟一半
重點是薪資又便宜 又不搶球權 把球交回咖哩手上進攻真的流暢很多
唯一的缺點大概就是年紀導致上場時間不能太長吧
但即使這樣我也不會認為當初簽KD是愚蠢的啦 獵鷹+300萬直接升級變一個mvp 誰不簽?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 27.246.168.209
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1491477414.A.DCD.html
推
04/06 19:17, , 1F
04/06 19:17, 1F
推
04/06 19:18, , 2F
04/06 19:18, 2F
噓
04/06 19:19, , 3F
04/06 19:19, 3F
推
04/06 19:19, , 4F
04/06 19:19, 4F
→
04/06 19:19, , 5F
04/06 19:19, 5F
這我認同 但現實就是球只有一顆 KD的打法確實多少限制了浪花的發揮
推
04/06 19:20, , 6F
04/06 19:20, 6F
※ 編輯: waiting0212 (27.246.168.209), 04/06/2017 19:21:40
推
04/06 19:20, , 7F
04/06 19:20, 7F
→
04/06 19:20, , 8F
04/06 19:20, 8F
推
04/06 19:21, , 9F
04/06 19:21, 9F
推
04/06 19:21, , 10F
04/06 19:21, 10F
→
04/06 19:21, , 11F
04/06 19:21, 11F
推
04/06 19:22, , 12F
04/06 19:22, 12F
推
04/06 19:23, , 13F
04/06 19:23, 13F
對忘記補充 買來還可以損敵軍的戰力
※ 編輯: waiting0212 (27.246.168.209), 04/06/2017 19:23:48
推
04/06 19:23, , 14F
04/06 19:23, 14F
→
04/06 19:24, , 15F
04/06 19:24, 15F
噓
04/06 19:24, , 16F
04/06 19:24, 16F
推
04/06 19:24, , 17F
04/06 19:24, 17F
推
04/06 19:25, , 18F
04/06 19:25, 18F
→
04/06 19:25, , 19F
04/06 19:25, 19F
→
04/06 19:25, , 20F
04/06 19:25, 20F
推
04/06 19:25, , 21F
04/06 19:25, 21F
推
04/06 19:26, , 22F
04/06 19:26, 22F
→
04/06 19:26, , 23F
04/06 19:26, 23F
推
04/06 19:27, , 24F
04/06 19:27, 24F
推
04/06 19:27, , 25F
04/06 19:27, 25F
→
04/06 19:27, , 26F
04/06 19:27, 26F
推
04/06 19:27, , 27F
04/06 19:27, 27F
→
04/06 19:27, , 28F
04/06 19:27, 28F
推
04/06 19:29, , 29F
04/06 19:29, 29F
推
04/06 19:29, , 30F
04/06 19:29, 30F
推
04/06 19:31, , 31F
04/06 19:31, 31F
推
04/06 19:32, , 32F
04/06 19:32, 32F
推
04/06 19:32, , 33F
04/06 19:32, 33F
推
04/06 19:32, , 34F
04/06 19:32, 34F
→
04/06 19:32, , 35F
04/06 19:32, 35F
推
04/06 19:34, , 36F
04/06 19:34, 36F
還有 74 則推文
推
04/06 21:29, , 111F
04/06 21:29, 111F
推
04/06 21:30, , 112F
04/06 21:30, 112F
推
04/06 21:30, , 113F
04/06 21:30, 113F
推
04/06 21:31, , 114F
04/06 21:31, 114F
→
04/06 21:31, , 115F
04/06 21:31, 115F
→
04/06 21:31, , 116F
04/06 21:31, 116F
→
04/06 21:32, , 117F
04/06 21:32, 117F
→
04/06 21:39, , 118F
04/06 21:39, 118F
→
04/06 21:41, , 119F
04/06 21:41, 119F
推
04/06 21:43, , 120F
04/06 21:43, 120F
推
04/06 21:47, , 121F
04/06 21:47, 121F
推
04/06 21:52, , 122F
04/06 21:52, 122F
→
04/06 21:52, , 123F
04/06 21:52, 123F
推
04/06 21:56, , 124F
04/06 21:56, 124F
推
04/06 22:05, , 125F
04/06 22:05, 125F
→
04/06 22:05, , 126F
04/06 22:05, 126F
→
04/06 22:05, , 127F
04/06 22:05, 127F
推
04/06 22:24, , 128F
04/06 22:24, 128F
推
04/06 22:45, , 129F
04/06 22:45, 129F
推
04/06 22:56, , 130F
04/06 22:56, 130F
推
04/06 22:57, , 131F
04/06 22:57, 131F
→
04/06 22:57, , 132F
04/06 22:57, 132F
推
04/06 23:35, , 133F
04/06 23:35, 133F
→
04/06 23:35, , 134F
04/06 23:35, 134F
推
04/06 23:37, , 135F
04/06 23:37, 135F
推
04/06 23:56, , 136F
04/06 23:56, 136F
→
04/06 23:56, , 137F
04/06 23:56, 137F
推
04/07 00:24, , 138F
04/07 00:24, 138F
→
04/07 00:24, , 139F
04/07 00:24, 139F
推
04/07 00:30, , 140F
04/07 00:30, 140F
→
04/07 00:30, , 141F
04/07 00:30, 141F
推
04/07 00:35, , 142F
04/07 00:35, 142F
推
04/07 01:42, , 143F
04/07 01:42, 143F
推
04/07 05:50, , 144F
04/07 05:50, 144F
推
04/07 06:41, , 145F
04/07 06:41, 145F
推
04/07 06:58, , 146F
04/07 06:58, 146F
噓
04/07 07:37, , 147F
04/07 07:37, 147F
推
04/07 08:58, , 148F
04/07 08:58, 148F
→
04/07 08:58, , 149F
04/07 08:58, 149F
噓
04/07 09:38, , 150F
04/07 09:38, 150F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):