[討論] 老大的帶隊能力其實很強吧
大家都知道近年來NBA越報越大團 一隊三個明星已經是家常便飯
甚至有像勇士4個 不然就是一堆前明星老將帶槍投靠的
例行賽輕鬆打也能進季後賽 反正我板凳都比你先發強
相比之下 雖然大家常笑Kobe 0.67輪什麼的
但是攤開湖人當年陣容來看 老大根本就超強啊
06.07年湖人簡直雜魚大隊 除了Kobe外就Odom算半個明星球員
連水貨狀元Kwame Brown在陣容裡都算強的了
隨便舉幾個Smush Parker.Brian Cook.Luke Walton.Chris Mihm..
這些球員放到現在絕對會被勇士板凳血虐吧
結果老大帶這樣的陣容 還能在當時超強的西區打進季後賽
(那時候西區馬刺.小牛.太陽都是60勝等級球隊 還有火箭灰熊金塊一票強隊)
甚至跟Nash的太陽火拼七場才敗陣..回頭看真的超扯的
後來Gasol來後就連續三年打進冠軍賽 還有人說老大抱腿
怎麼不想想Gasol在灰熊隊四年季後賽0-12? 結果一跟Kobe搭擋 馬上拿冠軍?
老大的帶隊能力是不是被嚴重低估了啊??
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 180.177.96.100
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1490984895.A.E03.html
推
04/01 02:29, , 1F
04/01 02:29, 1F
推
04/01 02:31, , 2F
04/01 02:31, 2F
推
04/01 02:31, , 3F
04/01 02:31, 3F
推
04/01 02:32, , 4F
04/01 02:32, 4F
推
04/01 02:32, , 5F
04/01 02:32, 5F
噓
04/01 02:33, , 6F
04/01 02:33, 6F
推
04/01 02:35, , 7F
04/01 02:35, 7F
推
04/01 02:37, , 8F
04/01 02:37, 8F
推
04/01 02:38, , 9F
04/01 02:38, 9F
→
04/01 02:38, , 10F
04/01 02:38, 10F
推
04/01 02:39, , 11F
04/01 02:39, 11F
→
04/01 02:43, , 12F
04/01 02:43, 12F
推
04/01 02:45, , 13F
04/01 02:45, 13F
推
04/01 02:45, , 14F
04/01 02:45, 14F
推
04/01 02:46, , 15F
04/01 02:46, 15F
推
04/01 02:47, , 16F
04/01 02:47, 16F
→
04/01 02:47, , 17F
04/01 02:47, 17F
→
04/01 02:49, , 18F
04/01 02:49, 18F
→
04/01 02:49, , 19F
04/01 02:49, 19F
→
04/01 02:50, , 20F
04/01 02:50, 20F
推
04/01 02:51, , 21F
04/01 02:51, 21F
→
04/01 02:51, , 22F
04/01 02:51, 22F
→
04/01 02:52, , 23F
04/01 02:52, 23F
→
04/01 02:52, , 24F
04/01 02:52, 24F
→
04/01 02:52, , 25F
04/01 02:52, 25F
→
04/01 02:52, , 26F
04/01 02:52, 26F
推
04/01 02:53, , 27F
04/01 02:53, 27F
→
04/01 02:53, , 28F
04/01 02:53, 28F
→
04/01 02:54, , 29F
04/01 02:54, 29F
推
04/01 02:54, , 30F
04/01 02:54, 30F
→
04/01 02:54, , 31F
04/01 02:54, 31F
推
04/01 02:55, , 32F
04/01 02:55, 32F
→
04/01 02:55, , 33F
04/01 02:55, 33F
→
04/01 02:55, , 34F
04/01 02:55, 34F
→
04/01 02:55, , 35F
04/01 02:55, 35F
→
04/01 02:55, , 36F
04/01 02:55, 36F
→
04/01 02:55, , 37F
04/01 02:55, 37F
→
04/01 02:55, , 38F
04/01 02:55, 38F
→
04/01 02:55, , 39F
04/01 02:55, 39F
還有 82 則推文
→
04/01 09:20, , 122F
04/01 09:20, 122F
→
04/01 09:20, , 123F
04/01 09:20, 123F
→
04/01 09:20, , 124F
04/01 09:20, 124F
推
04/01 09:22, , 125F
04/01 09:22, 125F
推
04/01 09:25, , 126F
04/01 09:25, 126F
推
04/01 09:30, , 127F
04/01 09:30, 127F
推
04/01 09:32, , 128F
04/01 09:32, 128F
推
04/01 09:33, , 129F
04/01 09:33, 129F
推
04/01 09:34, , 130F
04/01 09:34, 130F
推
04/01 09:35, , 131F
04/01 09:35, 131F
推
04/01 09:44, , 132F
04/01 09:44, 132F
→
04/01 09:44, , 133F
04/01 09:44, 133F
→
04/01 09:47, , 134F
04/01 09:47, 134F
推
04/01 09:47, , 135F
04/01 09:47, 135F
推
04/01 09:51, , 136F
04/01 09:51, 136F
→
04/01 09:54, , 137F
04/01 09:54, 137F
→
04/01 09:58, , 138F
04/01 09:58, 138F
推
04/01 10:05, , 139F
04/01 10:05, 139F
推
04/01 10:11, , 140F
04/01 10:11, 140F
推
04/01 10:12, , 141F
04/01 10:12, 141F
→
04/01 10:12, , 142F
04/01 10:12, 142F
推
04/01 10:20, , 143F
04/01 10:20, 143F
推
04/01 10:33, , 144F
04/01 10:33, 144F
推
04/01 10:35, , 145F
04/01 10:35, 145F
推
04/01 10:39, , 146F
04/01 10:39, 146F
推
04/01 10:43, , 147F
04/01 10:43, 147F
噓
04/01 10:49, , 148F
04/01 10:49, 148F
推
04/01 11:22, , 149F
04/01 11:22, 149F
→
04/01 11:22, , 150F
04/01 11:22, 150F
→
04/01 12:24, , 151F
04/01 12:24, 151F
推
04/01 12:42, , 152F
04/01 12:42, 152F
推
04/01 13:04, , 153F
04/01 13:04, 153F
噓
04/01 13:08, , 154F
04/01 13:08, 154F
推
04/01 13:17, , 155F
04/01 13:17, 155F
→
04/01 14:58, , 156F
04/01 14:58, 156F
推
04/01 15:37, , 157F
04/01 15:37, 157F
推
04/02 11:59, , 158F
04/02 11:59, 158F
推
04/02 16:51, , 159F
04/02 16:51, 159F
噓
04/02 18:39, , 160F
04/02 18:39, 160F
→
04/03 01:16, , 161F
04/03 01:16, 161F
討論串 (同標題文章)