[討論] 魔術時期跟湖人時期的Shaq哪個比較強
魔術時期體重比較輕
湖人時期體重比較重
不過看影片打法都差不多
不外乎勾射、硬往裡擠等中鋒基本進攻模式
只是速度快得不像中鋒
Shaq在湖人時期自稱MDE
但看命中率魔術時期也是高得可怕
究竟魔術時期的shaq比較強還是湖人時期比較強?
Shaq是在湖人變胖防守者頂不住才變更強了嗎?
還是其實他在魔術時期就已經MDE了?
畢竟兩個時期的打法感覺都差不多
Shaq去湖人好像也沒使用其他新技巧
之前也有版友po數據顯示大夢跟大歐當年是互爆的
大夢當年也守不住歐瘦
公牛後來幹掉魔術
有人記得當時Shaq有被小蟲鎖住嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.82.137.125
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1487001099.A.CCE.html
→
02/13 23:53, , 1F
02/13 23:53, 1F
推
02/13 23:54, , 2F
02/13 23:54, 2F
→
02/13 23:54, , 3F
02/13 23:54, 3F
→
02/13 23:55, , 4F
02/13 23:55, 4F
→
02/13 23:55, , 5F
02/13 23:55, 5F
→
02/13 23:57, , 6F
02/13 23:57, 6F
→
02/13 23:57, , 7F
02/13 23:57, 7F
推
02/13 23:58, , 8F
02/13 23:58, 8F
推
02/13 23:58, , 9F
02/13 23:58, 9F
推
02/14 00:01, , 10F
02/14 00:01, 10F
推
02/14 00:02, , 11F
02/14 00:02, 11F
推
02/14 00:03, , 12F
02/14 00:03, 12F
→
02/14 00:03, , 13F
02/14 00:03, 13F
推
02/14 00:06, , 14F
02/14 00:06, 14F
→
02/14 00:06, , 15F
02/14 00:06, 15F
推
02/14 00:06, , 16F
02/14 00:06, 16F
推
02/14 00:06, , 17F
02/14 00:06, 17F
→
02/14 00:07, , 18F
02/14 00:07, 18F
推
02/14 00:07, , 19F
02/14 00:07, 19F
→
02/14 00:07, , 20F
02/14 00:07, 20F
→
02/14 00:08, , 21F
02/14 00:08, 21F
推
02/14 00:09, , 22F
02/14 00:09, 22F
→
02/14 00:13, , 23F
02/14 00:13, 23F
推
02/14 00:14, , 24F
02/14 00:14, 24F
推
02/14 00:15, , 25F
02/14 00:15, 25F
→
02/14 00:15, , 26F
02/14 00:15, 26F
推
02/14 00:18, , 27F
02/14 00:18, 27F
推
02/14 00:19, , 28F
02/14 00:19, 28F
推
02/14 00:20, , 29F
02/14 00:20, 29F
推
02/14 00:24, , 30F
02/14 00:24, 30F
推
02/14 00:26, , 31F
02/14 00:26, 31F
推
02/14 00:27, , 32F
02/14 00:27, 32F
推
02/14 00:28, , 33F
02/14 00:28, 33F
→
02/14 00:28, , 34F
02/14 00:28, 34F
推
02/14 00:34, , 35F
02/14 00:34, 35F
→
02/14 00:34, , 36F
02/14 00:34, 36F
→
02/14 00:34, , 37F
02/14 00:34, 37F
推
02/14 00:36, , 38F
02/14 00:36, 38F
→
02/14 00:38, , 39F
02/14 00:38, 39F
還有 63 則推文
推
02/14 07:44, , 103F
02/14 07:44, 103F
→
02/14 07:44, , 104F
02/14 07:44, 104F
→
02/14 07:44, , 105F
02/14 07:44, 105F
→
02/14 07:46, , 106F
02/14 07:46, 106F
→
02/14 07:46, , 107F
02/14 07:46, 107F
推
02/14 07:52, , 108F
02/14 07:52, 108F
推
02/14 08:08, , 109F
02/14 08:08, 109F
→
02/14 08:08, , 110F
02/14 08:08, 110F
→
02/14 08:09, , 111F
02/14 08:09, 111F
→
02/14 08:09, , 112F
02/14 08:09, 112F
推
02/14 08:10, , 113F
02/14 08:10, 113F
推
02/14 08:45, , 114F
02/14 08:45, 114F
推
02/14 09:19, , 115F
02/14 09:19, 115F
推
02/14 09:24, , 116F
02/14 09:24, 116F
推
02/14 09:30, , 117F
02/14 09:30, 117F
推
02/14 09:32, , 118F
02/14 09:32, 118F
→
02/14 09:32, , 119F
02/14 09:32, 119F
推
02/14 09:56, , 120F
02/14 09:56, 120F
推
02/14 10:02, , 121F
02/14 10:02, 121F
推
02/14 10:41, , 122F
02/14 10:41, 122F
推
02/14 10:50, , 123F
02/14 10:50, 123F
推
02/14 10:50, , 124F
02/14 10:50, 124F
推
02/14 11:44, , 125F
02/14 11:44, 125F
推
02/14 12:18, , 126F
02/14 12:18, 126F
→
02/14 12:18, , 127F
02/14 12:18, 127F
→
02/14 12:30, , 128F
02/14 12:30, 128F
→
02/14 12:30, , 129F
02/14 12:30, 129F
→
02/14 12:32, , 130F
02/14 12:32, 130F
→
02/14 12:33, , 131F
02/14 12:33, 131F
→
02/14 12:34, , 132F
02/14 12:34, 132F
→
02/14 14:17, , 133F
02/14 14:17, 133F
推
02/14 14:53, , 134F
02/14 14:53, 134F
推
02/14 15:07, , 135F
02/14 15:07, 135F
→
02/14 15:23, , 136F
02/14 15:23, 136F
推
02/15 12:23, , 137F
02/15 12:23, 137F
→
02/15 12:23, , 138F
02/15 12:23, 138F
推
02/15 12:27, , 139F
02/15 12:27, 139F
推
02/15 19:14, , 140F
02/15 19:14, 140F
推
02/15 20:50, , 141F
02/15 20:50, 141F
→
02/15 20:51, , 142F
02/15 20:51, 142F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):