[情報] Barkley直播回應詹皇
Charles Barkley responds to LeBron James' recent comments. (streamable.com)
http://streamable.com/x9g2o?night=0&entrance=1
Kenny：今晚是最我期待的一晚，我想聽聽你怎麼回應LeBron？我先前沒打電話問你，因
為我不想你有所準備，就在這裡現場直播中直接了當地說清楚吧。
Barkley：首先，我對LeBron所說我的話沒有意見，那些都不是真的，大部分都不屬實。
我這輩子乾過很多蠢事，我幹評論員這行已經15-16年了，我對任何人任何球隊所做過的
評論都是嚴格關於籃球的，從來沒幹過針對個人攻擊的事。
我那些話的意思是，如果我是世上最強的球員，（LeBron）他確實是最強的，他有Irving
，Love，他們都是全明星， Thompson也是很不錯的球員，如果我有這些隊友，我會接受
挑戰任何球隊的機會，有這些人我不需要再多的幫助了。LeBron說他的球隊頭重腳輕，但
我確信甜瓜肯定會願意和這三人做隊友，威少也會願意有這三人成為隊友。
我之前所說過的話，我仍然堅持那些觀點， 但我那些話從來都不是針對個人的。LeBron
是我所見過最好的人之一，不可思議的人，他和他的同伴們所做的事情很不可思議。
過去幾天有很多人給我手機發消息，我有兩個手機， 一個是私人性質用的。一個是應付
蠢貨（Jackass）們的， 這次的事兒讓我應付蠢貨們用的手機炸鍋了。萬幸，那個應付蠢
貨們的手機我並沒有隨身帶著。
我這輩子乾過很多蠢事，我必須接受這個事實。如我所說的，雖然我幹過很多蠢事，但那
些歷史並不會減低我觀點的有效性。再強調一次，我對LeBron的那些說法全都是基於籃球
相關，並不是針對個人的。
https://bbs.hupu.com/18391293.html
Reddit網友評論：
[–]OKC HornetsTyrone_Lue 83 指標 2小時前?
jackass phone
“專門應付蠢貨的電話”
[–]RocketsSolid_Ronin 19 指標 1小時前?
Best part of the segment. I actually want one now.
這句是這段話里最亮的地方，我現在也想要一部這樣的電話了。
[–]HornetsYizWasHere 44 指標 2小時前?
So is this shit finally over?
所以這次的鬧劇終於結束了？
[–]LakersMolestingLester 22 指標 2小時前?
I was expecting some Rated-R response from Chuck. He took the higher road and
wants to move on..I see no problem.
我本來還指望Barkley再說出一些限制級的回應內容呢， 結果他選擇了高格調方式，想讓
這事過去了。 。 。沒毛病。
[–]-917- 8 指標 45 分鐘前?
I'm happy to move on, but my respect for Lebron dropped a notch this week.
我很開心這事過去了，但這周裡我對LeBron的尊敬少了一些
[–] Tracy McGradydjammz 31 指標 2小時前?
I agree with both Shaq and Chuck/Kenny on this.
Lebron did take it really personally with his response to Chuck's criticism, b
ut at the same time you could argue that calling out a player's competitive sp
irit (especially a player like Lebron) is making things personal.
Both Shaq/Chuck are right. In the end I just think Lebron's been quiet frustra
ted over the Cav's subpar record last month. Maybe he's also concerned about t
he lack of a playmaker and father time ticking away at him; and GSW steamrolli
ng everyone out there. Who knows. Bottom line is that his explosive response t
o Chuck was very extreme in comparison to the criticisms levelled against him,
and with Barkley making is closing remarks tonight it makes Lebron's look the
lesser man.
But what do I know, I don't even have a jackass phone.
這次的事，Shaq和Barkley/Kenmy的觀點我都讚同。
LeBron確實把這次的事看做是針對他個人的了，他回應了Barkley的批評。但是質疑一個
球員的競爭精神（尤其是像LeBron這樣的球員）確實會讓事情變得像是針對個人的。
Shaq和Barkley都是對的。說到底我認為LeBron是對上個月騎士的戰績很沮喪。也許他是
很在意球隊缺乏組織進攻的人，時間老人也讓他覺得力不從心了。還有勇士碾壓了所有人
。誰知道呢。相對於針對LeBron的批評， LeBron對Barkley的爆炸性回應顯得非常極端，
今晚Barkley的收尾回應則讓LeBron顯得很不男人。
但是這次的事也讓我明白了， 我連一部用於應付蠢貨們的電話都沒有。
[–]RaptorsTheTurtler31 123 指標 2小時前?
I think he proved he's the bigger man in it all. Shaq was mean in his response
to the situation and Chuck didn't take the bait. And he was right, what he sa
id wasn't personal and was what a lot of people (including Kenny) were thinkin
g when LeBron went to the media to complain.
I lost no respect for Chuck during this "ordeal," but a whole lot for LeBron a
nd a small amount for Shaq. They both seem to not like hearing dissenting opin
ions :/
我認為Barkley證明了他更男人，Shaq當時的反應很刻薄，而Barkley並沒有上鉤。Barkle
y沒有錯，他所說的話並不是針對個人的攻擊，而LeBron在媒體面前回應時，很多人（包
括Kenny）都覺得那些話是的。
在這次風波里我對Barkley沒有失去任何尊敬， 但是對LeBron失去很多敬意，對Shaq也失
去一些。Shaq和LeBron看起來都是不喜歡聽不同意見的人。
[–] Larry BirdVickBear 98 指標 1小時前?
Pretty sure Shaq understood Chuck's side of it, but Shaq thought the "not comp
eting" comment IS a personal attack, while Chuck disagrees. No need to lose re
spect for people. It is all about perspective as they said.
我很確定Shaq理解Barkley的意思， 但是Shaq覺得“不願意競爭”的評論說一種個人攻擊
，而Barkley並不這麼認為。沒必要對他們失去尊重，如他們所說的，這只是立場見解不
同而已。
[–] Mike Bibbygeneric_person2 17 指標 59 分鐘前?
And LeBron took it personally because it was an attack on his character and hi
s worth ethic in his opinion. I imagine how hard he works is a part of his pri
de, and he's tired of being questioned about it.
LeBron把這看作是針對個人的，因為他認為他的品性和職業素養被抨擊了。我感覺LeBron
很在意自己的自尊，他已經厭倦了被質疑。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 118.150.175.249
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1486101748.A.B60.html
推
02/03 14:04, , 1F
02/03 14:04, 1F
推
02/03 14:04, , 2F
02/03 14:04, 2F
推
02/03 14:05, , 3F
02/03 14:05, 3F
推
02/03 14:06, , 4F
02/03 14:06, 4F
推
02/03 14:06, , 5F
02/03 14:06, 5F
推
02/03 14:07, , 6F
02/03 14:07, 6F
推
02/03 14:07, , 7F
02/03 14:07, 7F
推
02/03 14:09, , 8F
02/03 14:09, 8F
推
02/03 14:10, , 9F
02/03 14:10, 9F
推
02/03 14:11, , 10F
02/03 14:11, 10F
推
02/03 14:11, , 11F
02/03 14:11, 11F
推
02/03 14:12, , 12F
02/03 14:12, 12F
推
02/03 14:12, , 13F
02/03 14:12, 13F
推
02/03 14:12, , 14F
02/03 14:12, 14F
推
02/03 14:12, , 15F
02/03 14:12, 15F
推
02/03 14:13, , 16F
02/03 14:13, 16F
推
02/03 14:14, , 17F
02/03 14:14, 17F
推
02/03 14:16, , 18F
02/03 14:16, 18F
推
02/03 14:16, , 19F
02/03 14:16, 19F
推
02/03 14:16, , 20F
02/03 14:16, 20F
推
02/03 14:17, , 21F
02/03 14:17, 21F
推
02/03 14:17, , 22F
02/03 14:17, 22F
→
02/03 14:18, , 23F
02/03 14:18, 23F
推
02/03 14:18, , 24F
02/03 14:18, 24F
推
02/03 14:18, , 25F
02/03 14:18, 25F
推
02/03 14:18, , 26F
02/03 14:18, 26F
→
02/03 14:18, , 27F
02/03 14:18, 27F
推
02/03 14:18, , 28F
02/03 14:18, 28F
推
02/03 14:19, , 29F
02/03 14:19, 29F
推
02/03 14:19, , 30F
02/03 14:19, 30F
推
02/03 14:19, , 31F
02/03 14:19, 31F
推
02/03 14:22, , 32F
02/03 14:22, 32F
推
02/03 14:22, , 33F
02/03 14:22, 33F
推
02/03 14:22, , 34F
02/03 14:22, 34F
推
02/03 14:24, , 35F
02/03 14:24, 35F
→
02/03 14:24, , 36F
02/03 14:24, 36F
→
02/03 14:24, , 37F
02/03 14:24, 37F
推
02/03 14:24, , 38F
02/03 14:24, 38F
→
02/03 14:24, , 39F
02/03 14:24, 39F
還有 236 則推文
還有 1 段內文
推
02/03 19:38, , 276F
02/03 19:38, 276F
推
02/03 19:49, , 277F
02/03 19:49, 277F
推
02/03 19:52, , 278F
02/03 19:52, 278F
噓
02/03 20:04, , 279F
02/03 20:04, 279F
→
02/03 20:04, , 280F
02/03 20:04, 280F
推
02/03 20:52, , 281F
02/03 20:52, 281F
→
02/03 20:52, , 282F
02/03 20:52, 282F
推
02/03 20:55, , 283F
02/03 20:55, 283F
推
02/03 20:58, , 284F
02/03 20:58, 284F
推
02/03 20:59, , 285F
02/03 20:59, 285F
→
02/03 20:59, , 286F
02/03 20:59, 286F
→
02/03 21:00, , 287F
02/03 21:00, 287F
→
02/03 21:04, , 288F
02/03 21:04, 288F
推
02/03 21:10, , 289F
02/03 21:10, 289F
推
02/03 21:28, , 290F
02/03 21:28, 290F
→
02/03 21:28, , 291F
02/03 21:28, 291F
→
02/03 21:30, , 292F
02/03 21:30, 292F
推
02/03 22:09, , 293F
02/03 22:09, 293F
→
02/03 22:10, , 294F
02/03 22:10, 294F
推
02/03 22:49, , 295F
02/03 22:49, 295F
推
02/03 23:05, , 296F
02/03 23:05, 296F
推
02/03 23:39, , 297F
02/03 23:39, 297F
推
02/03 23:44, , 298F
02/03 23:44, 298F
→
02/03 23:48, , 299F
02/03 23:48, 299F
→
02/03 23:49, , 300F
02/03 23:49, 300F
→
02/03 23:50, , 301F
02/03 23:50, 301F
推
02/04 00:12, , 302F
02/04 00:12, 302F
推
02/04 01:38, , 303F
02/04 01:38, 303F
→
02/04 01:38, , 304F
02/04 01:38, 304F
推
02/04 01:46, , 305F
02/04 01:46, 305F
→
02/04 01:48, , 306F
02/04 01:48, 306F
推
02/04 07:02, , 307F
02/04 07:02, 307F
噓
02/04 09:55, , 308F
02/04 09:55, 308F
→
02/04 13:11, , 309F
02/04 13:11, 309F
推
02/04 14:12, , 310F
02/04 14:12, 310F
推
02/04 14:40, , 311F
02/04 14:40, 311F
推
02/04 15:39, , 312F
02/04 15:39, 312F
噓
02/05 09:12, , 313F
02/05 09:12, 313F
推
02/05 10:18, , 314F
02/05 10:18, 314F
推
02/08 20:24, , 315F
02/08 20:24, 315F