Re: [BOX ] Clippers 98:144 Warriors 數據
這場數據來做個例子就非常的明顯了
平常勇士3~4人都要分出手,得分也都
分攤掉了
這場Curry的狀況如果換成神龜,肯定
第四節繼續上來刷50分超級大三元
神龜命中率很少很好過
很多大三元,根本出手落賽到很低的命
中率,分數難看,常靠硬切要犯,再湊
分數到2x分,籃板常常硬撿,隊友陣容
再差,一場刷10助攻,以神龜在雷霆根
本不難,但神龜這種打法,就是個人數
據好看,例行賽燃燒,累的要死,同時
也增加身體勞累跟受傷的風險
如果有神龜的絕對球權(球隊也允許單一球員這樣做),跟動不動25
次出手,相信很多球員也可刷出跟神龜
一樣的大三元次數的數據
同樣要像神龜這樣情形來追求大三元,
相信公鹿的字母哥,可以比神龜刷出更
多大三元,只是很少球隊會讓某一球員
這樣做,球員也不會想這樣做
今天如果神龜打法不是這樣(出手次數
有夠多,常常很多數據也很刻意),又
把球隊戰績帶到超好,MVP就無人可
以去質疑
神龜固然刷出很多大三元,但就是那樣
的情形與內容,跟Harden本季就差很
多,要比MVP, 很多人只是依據神龜平
均大三元數據,在論神龜應該要拿
不過這樣適合嗎?嚴格來說,神龜這種
情形,MVP候選人應該要排到五名之
後
所以神龜明星賽沒有先發,又有何可惜
太多的球員,球星,都可以做到像神龜
這樣,只是沒球隊會像雷霆一樣給神龜
刷到飽
其實阿杜離開雷霆,最大的受益,就是
神龜獨霸球權,大三元刷到飽,但有人
會認為這樣的雷霆是爭冠軍熱門嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 46.21.221.148
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1485688035.A.C6B.html
噓
01/29 19:08, , 1F
01/29 19:08, 1F
噓
01/29 19:09, , 2F
01/29 19:09, 2F
噓
01/29 19:10, , 3F
01/29 19:10, 3F
噓
01/29 19:10, , 4F
01/29 19:10, 4F
噓
01/29 19:10, , 5F
01/29 19:10, 5F
噓
01/29 19:11, , 6F
01/29 19:11, 6F
→
01/29 19:11, , 7F
01/29 19:11, 7F
噓
01/29 19:12, , 8F
01/29 19:12, 8F
噓
01/29 19:13, , 9F
01/29 19:13, 9F
噓
01/29 19:13, , 10F
01/29 19:13, 10F
推
01/29 19:13, , 11F
01/29 19:13, 11F
噓
01/29 19:14, , 12F
01/29 19:14, 12F
噓
01/29 19:14, , 13F
01/29 19:14, 13F
噓
01/29 19:15, , 14F
01/29 19:15, 14F
噓
01/29 19:17, , 15F
01/29 19:17, 15F
噓
01/29 19:18, , 16F
01/29 19:18, 16F
噓
01/29 19:18, , 17F
01/29 19:18, 17F
噓
01/29 19:20, , 18F
01/29 19:20, 18F
噓
01/29 19:21, , 19F
01/29 19:21, 19F
噓
01/29 19:27, , 20F
01/29 19:27, 20F
→
01/29 19:27, , 21F
01/29 19:27, 21F
推
01/29 19:28, , 22F
01/29 19:28, 22F
噓
01/29 19:36, , 23F
01/29 19:36, 23F
噓
01/29 19:36, , 24F
01/29 19:36, 24F
噓
01/29 19:37, , 25F
01/29 19:37, 25F
噓
01/29 19:45, , 26F
01/29 19:45, 26F
噓
01/29 19:45, , 27F
01/29 19:45, 27F
→
01/29 19:45, , 28F
01/29 19:45, 28F
→
01/29 19:46, , 29F
01/29 19:46, 29F
推
01/29 19:50, , 30F
01/29 19:50, 30F
噓
01/29 19:50, , 31F
01/29 19:50, 31F
噓
01/29 19:53, , 32F
01/29 19:53, 32F
推
01/29 19:53, , 33F
01/29 19:53, 33F
噓
01/29 19:55, , 34F
01/29 19:55, 34F
推
01/29 19:56, , 35F
01/29 19:56, 35F
噓
01/29 20:00, , 36F
01/29 20:00, 36F
推
01/29 20:01, , 37F
01/29 20:01, 37F
噓
01/29 20:01, , 38F
01/29 20:01, 38F
噓
01/29 20:07, , 39F
01/29 20:07, 39F
→
01/29 20:07, , 40F
01/29 20:07, 40F
推
01/29 20:10, , 41F
01/29 20:10, 41F
噓
01/29 20:16, , 42F
01/29 20:16, 42F
噓
01/29 20:23, , 43F
01/29 20:23, 43F
噓
01/29 20:23, , 44F
01/29 20:23, 44F
噓
01/29 20:32, , 45F
01/29 20:32, 45F
推
01/29 20:35, , 46F
01/29 20:35, 46F
推
01/29 20:37, , 47F
01/29 20:37, 47F
噓
01/29 20:40, , 48F
01/29 20:40, 48F
噓
01/29 20:46, , 49F
01/29 20:46, 49F
噓
01/29 21:02, , 50F
01/29 21:02, 50F
噓
01/29 21:06, , 51F
01/29 21:06, 51F
推
01/29 21:06, , 52F
01/29 21:06, 52F
推
01/29 21:08, , 53F
01/29 21:08, 53F
噓
01/29 21:14, , 54F
01/29 21:14, 54F
→
01/29 21:14, , 55F
01/29 21:14, 55F
噓
01/29 21:16, , 56F
01/29 21:16, 56F
噓
01/29 21:44, , 57F
01/29 21:44, 57F
噓
01/29 22:05, , 58F
01/29 22:05, 58F
→
01/29 22:06, , 59F
01/29 22:06, 59F
噓
01/29 22:11, , 60F
01/29 22:11, 60F
噓
01/29 22:20, , 61F
01/29 22:20, 61F
推
01/29 22:34, , 62F
01/29 22:34, 62F
→
01/29 22:34, , 63F
01/29 22:34, 63F
噓
01/29 22:39, , 64F
01/29 22:39, 64F
推
01/29 22:52, , 65F
01/29 22:52, 65F
→
01/29 22:53, , 66F
01/29 22:53, 66F
→
01/29 23:00, , 67F
01/29 23:00, 67F
噓
01/29 23:45, , 68F
01/29 23:45, 68F
推
01/29 23:50, , 69F
01/29 23:50, 69F
噓
01/30 01:15, , 70F
01/30 01:15, 70F
推
01/30 07:18, , 71F
01/30 07:18, 71F
推
01/30 08:51, , 72F
01/30 08:51, 72F
噓
01/30 11:06, , 73F
01/30 11:06, 73F
噓
01/30 11:21, , 74F
01/30 11:21, 74F
噓
01/30 11:32, , 75F
01/30 11:32, 75F
噓
01/30 12:39, , 76F
01/30 12:39, 76F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 3 篇):