Re: [討論] MJ明顯的缺點?
※ 引述《ilovesumika (ilovesumika)》之銘言:
: 我認為你說得沒錯,平心而論Jordan實在是比Kobe幸運很多,就成就數據上來講確實Jord
: an是比Kobe多了那麼一冠,但實質上成就Kobe應該是不在Jordan之下,以下進行科學性分
: 析,非EZ
你的分析根本就不合理
1. Kobe 的打法是學 Michael 的,包括動作、技巧、單打策略
最困難的永遠是第一個發展出來的人 也是最值得被紀念的
就算(後人把)蕭邦的曲彈得再好 光芒永遠還是在蕭邦之下
(補上黃色字,避免閱讀問題)
站在巨人肩膀上 本來就是學習的更快 發展的更好
Michael 是那個巨人,但 Kobe 不是
Kobe 是個籃球學習力很強的人 也勤於練習和鍛鍊 但是沒有技巧上的突破
2. 得分是靠出手次數累積的
Kobe 許多數據都是靠高出手 早出道而累積出來的
比這項成績就沒有太多意義了
3. 沒有提到 Michael 的領導力
Michael 不是只有鍛鍊自己 他還會推動隊友
讓人願意為他打球 跟他打球
Kobe 呢?有多少隊友跟他反目、背後說他壞話的?
籃球是團隊的運動,至少 Micheal 的籃球智商比 Kobe 高
我不是說 Kobe 不值得歌頌
但是你提出的「科學性分析」,一點都不科學
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 123.120.110.18
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1473603331.A.4A8.html
→
09/11 22:22, , 1F
09/11 22:22, 1F
噓
09/11 22:23, , 2F
09/11 22:23, 2F
→
09/11 22:23, , 3F
09/11 22:23, 3F
→
09/11 22:23, , 4F
09/11 22:23, 4F
噓
09/11 22:25, , 5F
09/11 22:25, 5F
噓
09/11 22:26, , 6F
09/11 22:26, 6F
把主詞加上
我講的是後來的人把蕭邦的曲彈得再好 也不會超越蕭邦
推
09/11 22:28, , 7F
09/11 22:28, 7F
推
09/11 22:28, , 8F
09/11 22:28, 8F
推
09/11 22:30, , 9F
09/11 22:30, 9F
推
09/11 22:30, , 10F
09/11 22:30, 10F
推
09/11 22:33, , 11F
09/11 22:33, 11F
噓
09/11 22:36, , 12F
09/11 22:36, 12F
→
09/11 22:36, , 13F
09/11 22:36, 13F
→
09/11 22:37, , 14F
09/11 22:37, 14F
推
09/11 22:40, , 15F
09/11 22:40, 15F
推
09/11 22:40, , 16F
09/11 22:40, 16F
推
09/11 22:46, , 17F
09/11 22:46, 17F
→
09/11 22:46, , 18F
09/11 22:46, 18F
→
09/11 22:46, , 19F
09/11 22:46, 19F
→
09/11 22:46, , 20F
09/11 22:46, 20F
推
09/11 22:47, , 21F
09/11 22:47, 21F
推
09/11 22:48, , 22F
09/11 22:48, 22F
推
09/11 22:49, , 23F
09/11 22:49, 23F
→
09/11 22:50, , 24F
09/11 22:50, 24F
→
09/11 22:50, , 25F
09/11 22:50, 25F
推
09/11 22:56, , 26F
09/11 22:56, 26F
噓
09/11 22:58, , 27F
09/11 22:58, 27F
推
09/11 23:02, , 28F
09/11 23:02, 28F
推
09/11 23:14, , 29F
09/11 23:14, 29F
推
09/11 23:42, , 30F
09/11 23:42, 30F
→
09/11 23:42, , 31F
09/11 23:42, 31F
推
09/11 23:46, , 32F
09/11 23:46, 32F
→
09/11 23:46, , 33F
09/11 23:46, 33F
→
09/11 23:46, , 34F
09/11 23:46, 34F
→
09/11 23:46, , 35F
09/11 23:46, 35F
→
09/11 23:46, , 36F
09/11 23:46, 36F
→
09/11 23:46, , 37F
09/11 23:46, 37F
推
09/11 23:51, , 38F
09/11 23:51, 38F
→
09/11 23:51, , 39F
09/11 23:51, 39F
推
09/11 23:58, , 40F
09/11 23:58, 40F
推
09/12 00:02, , 41F
09/12 00:02, 41F
→
09/12 00:04, , 42F
09/12 00:04, 42F
→
09/12 00:04, , 43F
09/12 00:04, 43F
推
09/12 00:11, , 44F
09/12 00:11, 44F
噓
09/12 00:18, , 45F
09/12 00:18, 45F
→
09/12 00:20, , 46F
09/12 00:20, 46F
→
09/12 00:29, , 47F
09/12 00:29, 47F
推
09/12 00:33, , 48F
09/12 00:33, 48F
噓
09/12 00:34, , 49F
09/12 00:34, 49F
→
09/12 00:55, , 50F
09/12 00:55, 50F
噓
09/12 00:58, , 51F
09/12 00:58, 51F
噓
09/12 01:03, , 52F
09/12 01:03, 52F
推
09/12 01:14, , 53F
09/12 01:14, 53F
推
09/12 01:55, , 54F
09/12 01:55, 54F
推
09/12 02:01, , 55F
09/12 02:01, 55F
推
09/12 02:33, , 56F
09/12 02:33, 56F
→
09/12 02:33, , 57F
09/12 02:33, 57F
→
09/12 02:52, , 58F
09/12 02:52, 58F
→
09/12 02:52, , 59F
09/12 02:52, 59F
→
09/12 02:54, , 60F
09/12 02:54, 60F
推
09/12 04:33, , 61F
09/12 04:33, 61F
推
09/12 05:29, , 62F
09/12 05:29, 62F
推
09/12 08:12, , 63F
09/12 08:12, 63F
噓
09/12 09:04, , 64F
09/12 09:04, 64F
推
09/12 09:28, , 65F
09/12 09:28, 65F
推
09/12 09:30, , 66F
09/12 09:30, 66F
推
09/12 09:32, , 67F
09/12 09:32, 67F
推
09/12 09:39, , 68F
09/12 09:39, 68F
→
09/12 09:39, , 69F
09/12 09:39, 69F
推
09/12 10:08, , 70F
09/12 10:08, 70F
噓
09/12 10:16, , 71F
09/12 10:16, 71F
※ 編輯: leondemon (117.122.208.4), 09/12/2016 10:26:49
推
09/12 11:15, , 72F
09/12 11:15, 72F
噓
09/12 11:45, , 73F
09/12 11:45, 73F
推
09/12 11:54, , 74F
09/12 11:54, 74F
噓
09/12 12:13, , 75F
09/12 12:13, 75F
推
09/12 12:21, , 76F
09/12 12:21, 76F
→
09/12 13:27, , 77F
09/12 13:27, 77F
→
09/12 13:27, , 78F
09/12 13:27, 78F
→
09/12 13:27, , 79F
09/12 13:27, 79F
→
09/12 13:27, , 80F
09/12 13:27, 80F
→
09/12 15:33, , 81F
09/12 15:33, 81F
噓
09/12 16:44, , 82F
09/12 16:44, 82F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
討論
-17
118
完整討論串 (本文為第 7 之 8 篇):
討論
-14
26
討論
22
82
討論
-17
118
討論
-33
75
討論
-12
77
討論
14
58
討論
37
76
討論
233
360