[討論] D Rose現在場上的影響力
剛剛和一個朋友聊到"現在的"D Rose
他覺得現在的Rose就只是個進攻很鐵,防守是洞的過譽球員,他導球效率很差,只有在僥倖做出PLAY剪Highlight的時候,才會覺得屌
我跟他持相反意見 ,我認為Rose的組織進攻能力還是有的,不然當年怎麽帶領他的快樂夥伴拿到東區第一,會輸給當時的熱火其實也不意外,他跟LBJ的隊友等級差太多檔次了
我朋友就吐嘈說Rose在季後賽豪無主宰能力,JR都比他有用,是因為他在場上效率高,打的都是無球進攻,而ROSE想當球星,就沒有球星的攻防能力,想當功能型球員,也找不倒讓他發揮作用的位置。
乍看之下 ROSE好像還有場均1X~2X分,是來自於比較長的上場時間+充分的持球時間,但是同樣的資源投資在其他球星,比如甜瓜,會得到更大的收益
他認為現在的ROSE=林書豪,懂?
平心而論,ROSE進攻能力仍比豪神略勝一籌,但是防守、組織能力說不定有過之而無不及
我就反問 你的意思是說給Lin一樣的持球空間和上場時間,他就會有Rose的成績?
我們爭論不下,想問各位都幾?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.165.114.70
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1467734484.A.BAB.html
噓
07/06 00:02, , 1F
07/06 00:02, 1F
→
07/06 00:02, , 2F
07/06 00:02, 2F
→
07/06 00:02, , 3F
07/06 00:02, 3F
→
07/06 00:02, , 4F
07/06 00:02, 4F
→
07/06 00:02, , 5F
07/06 00:02, 5F
→
07/06 00:02, , 6F
07/06 00:02, 6F
→
07/06 00:02, , 7F
07/06 00:02, 7F
→
07/06 00:03, , 8F
07/06 00:03, 8F
推
07/06 00:03, , 9F
07/06 00:03, 9F
→
07/06 00:03, , 10F
07/06 00:03, 10F
推
07/06 00:04, , 11F
07/06 00:04, 11F
→
07/06 00:04, , 12F
07/06 00:04, 12F
推
07/06 00:04, , 13F
07/06 00:04, 13F
→
07/06 00:05, , 14F
07/06 00:05, 14F
→
07/06 00:05, , 15F
07/06 00:05, 15F
→
07/06 00:05, , 16F
07/06 00:05, 16F
推
07/06 00:05, , 17F
07/06 00:05, 17F
推
07/06 00:05, , 18F
07/06 00:05, 18F
→
07/06 00:05, , 19F
07/06 00:05, 19F
推
07/06 00:06, , 20F
07/06 00:06, 20F
→
07/06 00:07, , 21F
07/06 00:07, 21F
推
07/06 00:07, , 22F
07/06 00:07, 22F
推
07/06 00:08, , 23F
07/06 00:08, 23F
推
07/06 00:09, , 24F
07/06 00:09, 24F
推
07/06 00:09, , 25F
07/06 00:09, 25F
噓
07/06 00:09, , 26F
07/06 00:09, 26F
推
07/06 00:10, , 27F
07/06 00:10, 27F
噓
07/06 00:10, , 28F
07/06 00:10, 28F
推
07/06 00:10, , 29F
07/06 00:10, 29F
推
07/06 00:11, , 30F
07/06 00:11, 30F
推
07/06 00:12, , 31F
07/06 00:12, 31F
→
07/06 00:13, , 32F
07/06 00:13, 32F
→
07/06 00:13, , 33F
07/06 00:13, 33F
推
07/06 00:13, , 34F
07/06 00:13, 34F
推
07/06 00:13, , 35F
07/06 00:13, 35F
推
07/06 00:13, , 36F
07/06 00:13, 36F
→
07/06 00:14, , 37F
07/06 00:14, 37F
推
07/06 00:14, , 38F
07/06 00:14, 38F
推
07/06 00:14, , 39F
07/06 00:14, 39F
還有 40 則推文
噓
07/06 00:57, , 80F
07/06 00:57, 80F
推
07/06 00:59, , 81F
07/06 00:59, 81F
推
07/06 00:59, , 82F
07/06 00:59, 82F
噓
07/06 01:01, , 83F
07/06 01:01, 83F
噓
07/06 01:08, , 84F
07/06 01:08, 84F
推
07/06 01:10, , 85F
07/06 01:10, 85F
推
07/06 01:11, , 86F
07/06 01:11, 86F
→
07/06 01:11, , 87F
07/06 01:11, 87F
推
07/06 01:11, , 88F
07/06 01:11, 88F
→
07/06 01:12, , 89F
07/06 01:12, 89F
噓
07/06 01:17, , 90F
07/06 01:17, 90F
推
07/06 01:23, , 91F
07/06 01:23, 91F
→
07/06 01:23, , 92F
07/06 01:23, 92F
→
07/06 01:28, , 93F
07/06 01:28, 93F
推
07/06 01:35, , 94F
07/06 01:35, 94F
推
07/06 01:40, , 95F
07/06 01:40, 95F
推
07/06 01:40, , 96F
07/06 01:40, 96F
→
07/06 02:04, , 97F
07/06 02:04, 97F
推
07/06 02:10, , 98F
07/06 02:10, 98F
→
07/06 02:38, , 99F
07/06 02:38, 99F
推
07/06 02:50, , 100F
07/06 02:50, 100F
→
07/06 02:51, , 101F
07/06 02:51, 101F
推
07/06 06:09, , 102F
07/06 06:09, 102F
噓
07/06 08:20, , 103F
07/06 08:20, 103F
噓
07/06 08:27, , 104F
07/06 08:27, 104F
噓
07/06 08:36, , 105F
07/06 08:36, 105F
→
07/06 08:36, , 106F
07/06 08:36, 106F
噓
07/06 08:42, , 107F
07/06 08:42, 107F
→
07/06 08:42, , 108F
07/06 08:42, 108F
推
07/06 09:00, , 109F
07/06 09:00, 109F
→
07/06 10:44, , 110F
07/06 10:44, 110F
噓
07/06 12:09, , 111F
07/06 12:09, 111F
推
07/06 12:22, , 112F
07/06 12:22, 112F
→
07/06 12:23, , 113F
07/06 12:23, 113F
推
07/06 12:24, , 114F
07/06 12:24, 114F
噓
07/06 12:42, , 115F
07/06 12:42, 115F
噓
07/06 13:47, , 116F
07/06 13:47, 116F
噓
07/06 14:05, , 117F
07/06 14:05, 117F
→
07/06 14:05, , 118F
07/06 14:05, 118F
推
07/06 15:16, , 119F
07/06 15:16, 119F