Re: [討論] 現在LOVE和熱火的BOSH誰比較猛?
Love跟Bosh要比誰比較不給力,這根本送分題R,
以前看熱火隊的比賽,熱火防守端漏洞就是Bosh,
原本以為Bosh已經夠軟了,結果Love不只軟,還龜速龜反應,
身高6呎10吋的陵南隊宮益,一整個廢到笑的概念。
但是熱火的整體防守質量還是很高,
那個8卦輪轉防守系統,是主打後衛/擋拆戰術球隊的最大惡夢,
缺點就是籃板漏很兇,Bosh體能沒有強大到能彌補這個戰術缺陷。
但騎士跟熱火的整體防守戰力還是差很多,
Love在防守端能作的只有顧好籃板球,
G5這場James 16籃板、Thompson 15籃板,Love 3籃板,
突然覺的Thompson的8200萬也不貴了。
再說進攻端,兩個大後鋒的三分球跟長距離都不算是穩定,
但是Bosh起碼不會讓球到他手上就變成死球,
該打掉的broken play,Bosh會果決的出手,
發生24秒違例或掉球,總是比投不進更傷球隊士氣,
然後Bosh的運球還OK,遇到緊迫貼身時可以突破買買飯也好。
這樣說,Bosh在對手進行防守壓迫時段的應變能力比Love高,
熱火也沒替Bosh打造適合他的戰術,
但是Bosh會去找尋自己的角色定位,
至於作的夠不夠好是另外一回事,
Love我不能說他都完全沒有上進的心,
但我不解的是,Love又不是黑人球員天份體能爆表,
靠腦袋、靠技巧、靠準度去最大化自己的能力,
這應該是他能在NBA混出一些名堂的最大原因,
怎麼到了最關鑑的時刻一整個失魂?
這真的是Love的天花板了嗎?
冠軍賽前我把love的表現定義成騎士奪冠與否的最大X因素,
因為騎士要跟勇士比得分,只有Love也能發揮情況下,
騎士的整體得分才會 > 勇士。
Love還有最後救贖自己的機會。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 60.249.134.134
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1465895373.A.F37.html
→
06/14 17:16, , 1F
06/14 17:16, 1F
噓
06/14 17:17, , 2F
06/14 17:17, 2F
推
06/14 17:17, , 3F
06/14 17:17, 3F
→
06/14 17:18, , 4F
06/14 17:18, 4F
→
06/14 17:19, , 5F
06/14 17:19, 5F
→
06/14 17:19, , 6F
06/14 17:19, 6F
→
06/14 17:20, , 7F
06/14 17:20, 7F
推
06/14 17:20, , 8F
06/14 17:20, 8F
→
06/14 17:20, , 9F
06/14 17:20, 9F
推
06/14 17:20, , 10F
06/14 17:20, 10F
→
06/14 17:21, , 11F
06/14 17:21, 11F
噓
06/14 17:22, , 12F
06/14 17:22, 12F
→
06/14 17:23, , 13F
06/14 17:23, 13F
→
06/14 17:24, , 14F
06/14 17:24, 14F
噓
06/14 17:25, , 15F
06/14 17:25, 15F
推
06/14 17:26, , 16F
06/14 17:26, 16F
噓
06/14 17:26, , 17F
06/14 17:26, 17F
推
06/14 17:27, , 18F
06/14 17:27, 18F
→
06/14 17:27, , 19F
06/14 17:27, 19F
推
06/14 17:29, , 20F
06/14 17:29, 20F
→
06/14 17:29, , 21F
06/14 17:29, 21F
推
06/14 17:31, , 22F
06/14 17:31, 22F
噓
06/14 17:33, , 23F
06/14 17:33, 23F
→
06/14 17:33, , 24F
06/14 17:33, 24F
→
06/14 17:33, , 25F
06/14 17:33, 25F
推
06/14 17:34, , 26F
06/14 17:34, 26F
→
06/14 17:35, , 27F
06/14 17:35, 27F
推
06/14 17:35, , 28F
06/14 17:35, 28F
→
06/14 17:36, , 29F
06/14 17:36, 29F
推
06/14 17:36, , 30F
06/14 17:36, 30F
噓
06/14 17:36, , 31F
06/14 17:36, 31F
噓
06/14 17:38, , 32F
06/14 17:38, 32F
噓
06/14 17:39, , 33F
06/14 17:39, 33F
→
06/14 17:40, , 34F
06/14 17:40, 34F
→
06/14 17:40, , 35F
06/14 17:40, 35F
噓
06/14 17:42, , 36F
06/14 17:42, 36F
推
06/14 17:46, , 37F
06/14 17:46, 37F
推
06/14 17:47, , 38F
06/14 17:47, 38F
噓
06/14 17:49, , 39F
06/14 17:49, 39F
還有 27 則推文
→
06/14 18:54, , 67F
06/14 18:54, 67F
推
06/14 18:56, , 68F
06/14 18:56, 68F
→
06/14 18:56, , 69F
06/14 18:56, 69F
→
06/14 18:57, , 70F
06/14 18:57, 70F
→
06/14 18:57, , 71F
06/14 18:57, 71F
→
06/14 18:58, , 72F
06/14 18:58, 72F
→
06/14 18:58, , 73F
06/14 18:58, 73F
推
06/14 19:01, , 74F
06/14 19:01, 74F
推
06/14 19:28, , 75F
06/14 19:28, 75F
噓
06/14 19:29, , 76F
06/14 19:29, 76F
→
06/14 19:32, , 77F
06/14 19:32, 77F
推
06/14 19:33, , 78F
06/14 19:33, 78F
→
06/14 19:35, , 79F
06/14 19:35, 79F
噓
06/14 19:45, , 80F
06/14 19:45, 80F
→
06/14 19:50, , 81F
06/14 19:50, 81F
推
06/14 20:00, , 82F
06/14 20:00, 82F
推
06/14 20:01, , 83F
06/14 20:01, 83F
→
06/14 20:02, , 84F
06/14 20:02, 84F
推
06/14 20:22, , 85F
06/14 20:22, 85F
→
06/14 20:23, , 86F
06/14 20:23, 86F
→
06/14 20:30, , 87F
06/14 20:30, 87F
噓
06/14 20:33, , 88F
06/14 20:33, 88F
推
06/14 20:41, , 89F
06/14 20:41, 89F
噓
06/14 21:10, , 90F
06/14 21:10, 90F
推
06/14 21:45, , 91F
06/14 21:45, 91F
推
06/14 21:50, , 92F
06/14 21:50, 92F
推
06/14 22:18, , 93F
06/14 22:18, 93F
推
06/14 23:24, , 94F
06/14 23:24, 94F
噓
06/14 23:43, , 95F
06/14 23:43, 95F
推
06/15 00:28, , 96F
06/15 00:28, 96F
噓
06/15 01:08, , 97F
06/15 01:08, 97F
噓
06/15 01:59, , 98F
06/15 01:59, 98F
噓
06/15 02:56, , 99F
06/15 02:56, 99F
→
06/15 02:57, , 100F
06/15 02:57, 100F
推
06/15 08:42, , 101F
06/15 08:42, 101F
噓
06/15 10:01, , 102F
06/15 10:01, 102F
→
06/15 10:02, , 103F
06/15 10:02, 103F
噓
06/15 13:00, , 104F
06/15 13:00, 104F
推
06/16 02:31, , 105F
06/16 02:31, 105F
噓
06/16 07:41, , 106F
06/16 07:41, 106F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):