[討論] Gasol和Kobe是近年來最好的組合嗎?
雙人組合現在很多,比較想討論的是傳統前鋒或中鋒搭配後衛的組合。
湖人當時三次西區冠軍,兩次聯盟冠軍,主力陣容有有Bynum,Odom,Fisher,Ariza,Artest,教練是禪師。
Bynum:低位單打技巧好,罰球準,對抗性較差
Odom:全能鋒線球員,最佳第六人
Fisher:自殺上籃,關鍵三分
Ariza&Artest:防守大鎖
看起來主要還是靠Gasol和Kobe兩人的配合,Bynum成長應該是比較後面的事,目前中前鋒配後衛搭配比較好的組合,我目前想到的是火箭那兩個,但看本季似乎配合不起來,拓荒者組合本季也拆夥了,還有比Gasol和Kobe更成功的組合嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 115.216.102.210
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1454423601.A.E28.html
推
02/02 22:34, , 1F
02/02 22:34, 1F
推
02/02 22:35, , 2F
02/02 22:35, 2F
推
02/02 22:35, , 3F
02/02 22:35, 3F
推
02/02 22:36, , 4F
02/02 22:36, 4F
→
02/02 22:36, , 5F
02/02 22:36, 5F
推
02/02 22:37, , 6F
02/02 22:37, 6F
噓
02/02 22:40, , 7F
02/02 22:40, 7F
推
02/02 22:40, , 8F
02/02 22:40, 8F
噓
02/02 22:40, , 9F
02/02 22:40, 9F
推
02/02 22:40, , 10F
02/02 22:40, 10F
→
02/02 22:43, , 11F
02/02 22:43, 11F
推
02/02 22:43, , 12F
02/02 22:43, 12F
推
02/02 22:45, , 13F
02/02 22:45, 13F
這個雙人組的確很猛,可惜沒拿冠軍…
噓
02/02 22:45, , 14F
02/02 22:45, 14F
※ 編輯: kmwace (115.216.102.210), 02/02/2016 22:46:50
噓
02/02 22:46, , 15F
02/02 22:46, 15F
我舉Kobe和Gasol你就不要往回推了吧…
※ 編輯: kmwace (115.216.102.210), 02/02/2016 22:48:23
推
02/02 22:50, , 16F
02/02 22:50, 16F
推
02/02 22:53, , 17F
02/02 22:53, 17F
推
02/02 22:53, , 18F
02/02 22:53, 18F
噓
02/02 22:55, , 19F
02/02 22:55, 19F
推
02/02 22:55, , 20F
02/02 22:55, 20F
→
02/02 22:55, , 21F
02/02 22:55, 21F
→
02/02 22:55, , 22F
02/02 22:55, 22F
→
02/02 22:56, , 23F
02/02 22:56, 23F
推
02/02 22:56, , 24F
02/02 22:56, 24F
推
02/02 23:00, , 25F
02/02 23:00, 25F
推
02/02 23:02, , 26F
02/02 23:02, 26F
推
02/02 23:05, , 27F
02/02 23:05, 27F
推
02/02 23:12, , 28F
02/02 23:12, 28F
推
02/02 23:18, , 29F
02/02 23:18, 29F
→
02/02 23:20, , 30F
02/02 23:20, 30F
推
02/02 23:20, , 31F
02/02 23:20, 31F
推
02/02 23:23, , 32F
02/02 23:23, 32F
推
02/02 23:25, , 33F
02/02 23:25, 33F
推
02/02 23:27, , 34F
02/02 23:27, 34F
推
02/02 23:28, , 35F
02/02 23:28, 35F
推
02/02 23:30, , 36F
02/02 23:30, 36F
推
02/02 23:32, , 37F
02/02 23:32, 37F
→
02/02 23:33, , 38F
02/02 23:33, 38F
推
02/02 23:33, , 39F
02/02 23:33, 39F
→
02/02 23:33, , 40F
02/02 23:33, 40F
推
02/02 23:42, , 41F
02/02 23:42, 41F
→
02/02 23:43, , 42F
02/02 23:43, 42F
→
02/03 00:10, , 43F
02/03 00:10, 43F
推
02/03 00:14, , 44F
02/03 00:14, 44F
推
02/03 00:15, , 45F
02/03 00:15, 45F
→
02/03 00:16, , 46F
02/03 00:16, 46F
推
02/03 00:18, , 47F
02/03 00:18, 47F
推
02/03 00:22, , 48F
02/03 00:22, 48F
推
02/03 00:33, , 49F
02/03 00:33, 49F
推
02/03 00:49, , 50F
02/03 00:49, 50F
推
02/03 00:55, , 51F
02/03 00:55, 51F
推
02/03 00:55, , 52F
02/03 00:55, 52F
推
02/03 01:17, , 53F
02/03 01:17, 53F
→
02/03 01:21, , 54F
02/03 01:21, 54F
推
02/03 02:32, , 55F
02/03 02:32, 55F
推
02/03 05:05, , 56F
02/03 05:05, 56F
推
02/03 05:11, , 57F
02/03 05:11, 57F
推
02/03 07:59, , 58F
02/03 07:59, 58F
推
02/03 08:28, , 59F
02/03 08:28, 59F
推
02/03 08:48, , 60F
02/03 08:48, 60F
推
02/03 09:14, , 61F
02/03 09:14, 61F
推
02/03 09:42, , 62F
02/03 09:42, 62F
推
02/03 10:27, , 63F
02/03 10:27, 63F
→
02/03 10:27, , 64F
02/03 10:27, 64F
推
02/03 10:30, , 65F
02/03 10:30, 65F
→
02/03 10:37, , 66F
02/03 10:37, 66F
推
02/03 11:18, , 67F
02/03 11:18, 67F
推
02/03 12:36, , 68F
02/03 12:36, 68F
→
02/03 12:36, , 69F
02/03 12:36, 69F
推
02/03 13:22, , 70F
02/03 13:22, 70F
→
02/03 13:24, , 71F
02/03 13:24, 71F
推
02/03 18:34, , 72F
02/03 18:34, 72F
推
02/04 02:36, , 73F
02/04 02:36, 73F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):