[討論] Rubio跟Rondo哪一位較為優秀?
兩位控球後衛
屬於傳球界的Kobe
有自己投的機會大多會放掉
就是要傳球拿助攻
而兩位都是組織進攻傳球擅長
對於投籃方面都是系隊等級的
但盧一球罰球還算穩
軟豆連罰球都有問題
傳球兩位都屬於魔術表演
華麗且失誤並不高
算是穩定且有觀賞性
目前感覺軟豆有點在走下坡了
少了昔日三巨頭強大的得分庇護
現在要刷20助攻已經有點難度了
而盧一球則是需要收集能力
常常手軟個幾場後才會爆發個一場
投籃再練個10年或許略有小成
還帥度方面盧一球完爆軟豆
大家覺得兩位組織型PG誰較略勝一籌呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.32.51.91
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1449404768.A.F88.html
推
12/06 20:26, , 1F
12/06 20:26, 1F
推
12/06 20:27, , 2F
12/06 20:27, 2F
推
12/06 20:27, , 3F
12/06 20:27, 3F
推
12/06 20:28, , 4F
12/06 20:28, 4F
以前軟豆20助攻算是很正常 對他來說拿大三元是得分最難
※ 編輯: c1236 (114.32.51.91), 12/06/2015 20:28:58
推
12/06 20:29, , 5F
12/06 20:29, 5F
→
12/06 20:29, , 6F
12/06 20:29, 6F
→
12/06 20:29, , 7F
12/06 20:29, 7F
→
12/06 20:30, , 8F
12/06 20:30, 8F
推
12/06 20:30, , 9F
12/06 20:30, 9F
推
12/06 20:31, , 10F
12/06 20:31, 10F
噓
12/06 20:31, , 11F
12/06 20:31, 11F
推
12/06 20:31, , 12F
12/06 20:31, 12F
推
12/06 20:31, , 13F
12/06 20:31, 13F
→
12/06 20:31, , 14F
12/06 20:31, 14F
→
12/06 20:32, , 15F
12/06 20:32, 15F
推
12/06 20:33, , 16F
12/06 20:33, 16F
推
12/06 20:33, , 17F
12/06 20:33, 17F
推
12/06 20:34, , 18F
12/06 20:34, 18F
→
12/06 20:35, , 19F
12/06 20:35, 19F
噓
12/06 20:36, , 20F
12/06 20:36, 20F
盧一球不洗數據大家都知道 別激動 軟豆愛洗助攻 明明可以兩分他不要
推
12/06 20:36, , 21F
12/06 20:36, 21F
→
12/06 20:37, , 22F
12/06 20:37, 22F
→
12/06 20:37, , 23F
12/06 20:37, 23F
要carry要有得分輸出 你要support怎麼carry? 我認為這並不是組織型PG的工作
推
12/06 20:38, , 24F
12/06 20:38, 24F
※ 編輯: c1236 (114.32.51.91), 12/06/2015 20:42:31
推
12/06 20:39, , 25F
12/06 20:39, 25F
→
12/06 20:39, , 26F
12/06 20:39, 26F
→
12/06 20:39, , 27F
12/06 20:39, 27F
推
12/06 20:44, , 28F
12/06 20:44, 28F
推
12/06 20:46, , 29F
12/06 20:46, 29F
推
12/06 20:46, , 30F
12/06 20:46, 30F
特別找了我認為最屌的play
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cHe_kA4Q4A
Rubio
※ 編輯: c1236 (114.32.51.91), 12/06/2015 20:50:02
推
12/06 20:49, , 31F
12/06 20:49, 31F
噓
12/06 20:50, , 32F
12/06 20:50, 32F
噓
12/06 20:51, , 33F
12/06 20:51, 33F
推
12/06 20:55, , 34F
12/06 20:55, 34F
推
12/06 20:56, , 35F
12/06 20:56, 35F
推
12/06 20:57, , 36F
12/06 20:57, 36F
推
12/06 20:57, , 37F
12/06 20:57, 37F
推
12/06 20:57, , 38F
12/06 20:57, 38F
→
12/06 20:58, , 39F
12/06 20:58, 39F
→
12/06 20:59, , 40F
12/06 20:59, 40F
噓
12/06 20:59, , 41F
12/06 20:59, 41F
噓
12/06 20:59, , 42F
12/06 20:59, 42F
→
12/06 21:00, , 43F
12/06 21:00, 43F
推
12/06 21:03, , 44F
12/06 21:03, 44F
噓
12/06 21:03, , 45F
12/06 21:03, 45F
推
12/06 21:07, , 46F
12/06 21:07, 46F
推
12/06 21:07, , 47F
12/06 21:07, 47F
推
12/06 21:09, , 48F
12/06 21:09, 48F
→
12/06 21:10, , 49F
12/06 21:10, 49F
推
12/06 21:14, , 50F
12/06 21:14, 50F
推
12/06 21:19, , 51F
12/06 21:19, 51F
推
12/06 21:24, , 52F
12/06 21:24, 52F
推
12/06 21:25, , 53F
12/06 21:25, 53F
→
12/06 21:36, , 54F
12/06 21:36, 54F
→
12/06 21:38, , 55F
12/06 21:38, 55F
→
12/06 21:39, , 56F
12/06 21:39, 56F
推
12/06 21:41, , 57F
12/06 21:41, 57F
推
12/06 21:56, , 58F
12/06 21:56, 58F
推
12/06 22:02, , 59F
12/06 22:02, 59F
→
12/06 22:17, , 60F
12/06 22:17, 60F
推
12/06 22:29, , 61F
12/06 22:29, 61F
推
12/06 22:31, , 62F
12/06 22:31, 62F
→
12/06 22:31, , 63F
12/06 22:31, 63F
推
12/06 22:46, , 64F
12/06 22:46, 64F
推
12/06 22:47, , 65F
12/06 22:47, 65F
→
12/06 22:50, , 66F
12/06 22:50, 66F
推
12/06 23:06, , 67F
12/06 23:06, 67F
→
12/06 23:07, , 68F
12/06 23:07, 68F
→
12/06 23:48, , 69F
12/06 23:48, 69F
噓
12/07 00:04, , 70F
12/07 00:04, 70F
推
12/07 00:41, , 71F
12/07 00:41, 71F
推
12/07 07:30, , 72F
12/07 07:30, 72F
推
12/07 09:37, , 73F
12/07 09:37, 73F
→
12/07 09:37, , 74F
12/07 09:37, 74F
噓
12/07 10:06, , 75F
12/07 10:06, 75F
推
12/07 11:06, , 76F
12/07 11:06, 76F
推
12/07 12:44, , 77F
12/07 12:44, 77F
推
12/07 14:17, , 78F
12/07 14:17, 78F
推
12/07 17:37, , 79F
12/07 17:37, 79F
→
12/07 20:22, , 80F
12/07 20:22, 80F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):