[討論] 讓中鋒出來守curry有沒有搞頭?
Curry不只三分突破天際
而且切入也很有水準
想貪心的想同時封住他的外線和切入好像不太可能
不如務實一點
只選擇封他外線是比較好的選擇?
現在跟他對位的後衛就算猜到他要在外線開噴
也苦於出手時間太短和身高不夠只能目送
如果直接把中鋒推出三分線
就算curry出手太快跟不上,
起碼身高擺在那邊,多少可以逼他把彈道拉高
如果剛好跟到,更有機會煽到火鍋
讓Curry選擇更多的切入
反正他外線命中率都高到快跟兩分一樣了
與其給三分不如給兩分
起碼他在禁區的表現沒有三分這麼變態
我的觀察辣
這樣有沒有搞頭?
--
存好心 發好問
( ̄▽ ̄)ノ 專發優質好問
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 118.167.7.16
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1449235587.A.1D8.html
噓
12/04 21:26, , 1F
12/04 21:26, 1F
噓
12/04 21:27, , 2F
12/04 21:27, 2F
推
12/04 21:27, , 3F
12/04 21:27, 3F
推
12/04 21:27, , 4F
12/04 21:27, 4F
→
12/04 21:27, , 5F
12/04 21:27, 5F
噓
12/04 21:28, , 6F
12/04 21:28, 6F
就是讓他過啊
至少可以減少他在三分線的出手
※ 編輯: wxes (118.167.7.16), 12/04/2015 21:29:30
→
12/04 21:29, , 7F
12/04 21:29, 7F
推
12/04 21:29, , 8F
12/04 21:29, 8F
→
12/04 21:29, , 9F
12/04 21:29, 9F
推
12/04 21:29, , 10F
12/04 21:29, 10F
推
12/04 21:29, , 11F
12/04 21:29, 11F
推
12/04 21:30, , 12F
12/04 21:30, 12F
→
12/04 21:30, , 13F
12/04 21:30, 13F
推
12/04 21:31, , 14F
12/04 21:31, 14F
推
12/04 21:31, , 15F
12/04 21:31, 15F
噓
12/04 21:31, , 16F
12/04 21:31, 16F
推
12/04 21:31, , 17F
12/04 21:31, 17F
推
12/04 21:31, , 18F
12/04 21:31, 18F
→
12/04 21:31, , 19F
12/04 21:31, 19F
推
12/04 21:32, , 20F
12/04 21:32, 20F
→
12/04 21:33, , 21F
12/04 21:33, 21F
→
12/04 21:33, , 22F
12/04 21:33, 22F
→
12/04 21:33, , 23F
12/04 21:33, 23F
噓
12/04 21:33, , 24F
12/04 21:33, 24F
噓
12/04 21:34, , 25F
12/04 21:34, 25F
推
12/04 21:35, , 26F
12/04 21:35, 26F
推
12/04 21:36, , 27F
12/04 21:36, 27F
→
12/04 21:37, , 28F
12/04 21:37, 28F
推
12/04 21:37, , 29F
12/04 21:37, 29F
→
12/04 21:37, , 30F
12/04 21:37, 30F
噓
12/04 21:38, , 31F
12/04 21:38, 31F
→
12/04 21:39, , 32F
12/04 21:39, 32F
推
12/04 21:41, , 33F
12/04 21:41, 33F
推
12/04 21:41, , 34F
12/04 21:41, 34F
推
12/04 21:41, , 35F
12/04 21:41, 35F
噓
12/04 21:41, , 36F
12/04 21:41, 36F
噓
12/04 21:43, , 37F
12/04 21:43, 37F
噓
12/04 21:43, , 38F
12/04 21:43, 38F
還有 52 則推文
→
12/04 23:29, , 91F
12/04 23:29, 91F
噓
12/04 23:31, , 92F
12/04 23:31, 92F
→
12/04 23:31, , 93F
12/04 23:31, 93F
噓
12/04 23:32, , 94F
12/04 23:32, 94F
噓
12/04 23:33, , 95F
12/04 23:33, 95F
推
12/04 23:38, , 96F
12/04 23:38, 96F
噓
12/04 23:44, , 97F
12/04 23:44, 97F
→
12/04 23:44, , 98F
12/04 23:44, 98F
噓
12/04 23:49, , 99F
12/04 23:49, 99F
推
12/04 23:52, , 100F
12/04 23:52, 100F
噓
12/05 00:06, , 101F
12/05 00:06, 101F
噓
12/05 00:16, , 102F
12/05 00:16, 102F
噓
12/05 00:25, , 103F
12/05 00:25, 103F
噓
12/05 00:35, , 104F
12/05 00:35, 104F
→
12/05 00:52, , 105F
12/05 00:52, 105F
噓
12/05 01:18, , 106F
12/05 01:18, 106F
推
12/05 01:47, , 107F
12/05 01:47, 107F
推
12/05 02:04, , 108F
12/05 02:04, 108F
推
12/05 02:52, , 109F
12/05 02:52, 109F
噓
12/05 03:34, , 110F
12/05 03:34, 110F
→
12/05 05:26, , 111F
12/05 05:26, 111F
推
12/05 06:52, , 112F
12/05 06:52, 112F
推
12/05 08:05, , 113F
12/05 08:05, 113F
→
12/05 08:05, , 114F
12/05 08:05, 114F
推
12/05 08:13, , 115F
12/05 08:13, 115F
噓
12/05 08:28, , 116F
12/05 08:28, 116F
→
12/05 08:50, , 117F
12/05 08:50, 117F
→
12/05 08:52, , 118F
12/05 08:52, 118F
→
12/05 08:53, , 119F
12/05 08:53, 119F
→
12/05 08:53, , 120F
12/05 08:53, 120F
→
12/05 08:54, , 121F
12/05 08:54, 121F
→
12/05 08:55, , 122F
12/05 08:55, 122F
→
12/05 08:55, , 123F
12/05 08:55, 123F
噓
12/05 10:02, , 124F
12/05 10:02, 124F
噓
12/05 11:05, , 125F
12/05 11:05, 125F
噓
12/05 11:28, , 126F
12/05 11:28, 126F
→
12/05 11:29, , 127F
12/05 11:29, 127F
噓
12/05 12:52, , 128F
12/05 12:52, 128F
噓
12/05 13:09, , 129F
12/05 13:09, 129F
噓
12/05 13:52, , 130F
12/05 13:52, 130F