[討論] 為何林書豪實力進步成績卻退步 ?
大家安安
大家好
小妹我最近開始看NBA
聽別人說林來瘋那時候超猛DER
去找了一下影片
那個打爆KOBE真的豪爽RRRR
不過有個疑問是
為何林書豪感覺實力進步了
無論投籃 防守 體能 身體素質
都明顯比在尼克那時候好上一截
但為何林書豪的成績卻是逐年退步?
當年甚至被譽為NASH的接班人
結果到火箭和湖人後都不得志
現在在黃蜂也沒有受到重用
一般來說球員應該都會越打越精進吧
林書豪也是
但明明變得更強了
為何教練都不派他上場呢?
要是給他個能配合的隊友
他每場刷個15分 8助攻 這種成績一定可以吧?
書豪明明有這種能力
但是教練卻為何不用他?
而且林來瘋那段也證明那不只是運氣
因為他是連續好幾場都超猛
結果現在落得如此下場 哀
難道黃蜂都不想要再一個林來瘋嗎?
大家覺得呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.47.188.143
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1448945121.A.3C9.html
推
12/01 12:45, , 1F
12/01 12:45, 1F
噓
12/01 12:46, , 2F
12/01 12:46, 2F
推
12/01 12:46, , 3F
12/01 12:46, 3F
推
12/01 12:46, , 4F
12/01 12:46, 4F
推
12/01 12:47, , 5F
12/01 12:47, 5F
→
12/01 12:47, , 6F
12/01 12:47, 6F
推
12/01 12:47, , 7F
12/01 12:47, 7F
推
12/01 12:47, , 8F
12/01 12:47, 8F
推
12/01 12:48, , 9F
12/01 12:48, 9F
推
12/01 12:48, , 10F
12/01 12:48, 10F
→
12/01 12:48, , 11F
12/01 12:48, 11F
推
12/01 12:48, , 12F
12/01 12:48, 12F
噓
12/01 12:48, , 13F
12/01 12:48, 13F
噓
12/01 12:48, , 14F
12/01 12:48, 14F
推
12/01 12:48, , 15F
12/01 12:48, 15F
推
12/01 12:49, , 16F
12/01 12:49, 16F
推
12/01 12:49, , 17F
12/01 12:49, 17F
噓
12/01 12:49, , 18F
12/01 12:49, 18F
推
12/01 12:49, , 19F
12/01 12:49, 19F
推
12/01 12:49, , 20F
12/01 12:49, 20F
→
12/01 12:49, , 21F
12/01 12:49, 21F
推
12/01 12:50, , 22F
12/01 12:50, 22F
→
12/01 12:50, , 23F
12/01 12:50, 23F
推
12/01 12:50, , 24F
12/01 12:50, 24F
噓
12/01 12:50, , 25F
12/01 12:50, 25F
推
12/01 12:50, , 26F
12/01 12:50, 26F
推
12/01 12:51, , 27F
12/01 12:51, 27F
噓
12/01 12:51, , 28F
12/01 12:51, 28F
推
12/01 12:51, , 29F
12/01 12:51, 29F
噓
12/01 12:52, , 30F
12/01 12:52, 30F
噓
12/01 12:52, , 31F
12/01 12:52, 31F
→
12/01 12:53, , 32F
12/01 12:53, 32F
→
12/01 12:53, , 33F
12/01 12:53, 33F
噓
12/01 12:53, , 34F
12/01 12:53, 34F
→
12/01 12:54, , 35F
12/01 12:54, 35F
→
12/01 12:54, , 36F
12/01 12:54, 36F
推
12/01 12:54, , 37F
12/01 12:54, 37F
噓
12/01 12:55, , 38F
12/01 12:55, 38F
→
12/01 12:55, , 39F
12/01 12:55, 39F
還有 28 則推文
噓
12/01 13:38, , 68F
12/01 13:38, 68F
推
12/01 13:42, , 69F
12/01 13:42, 69F
推
12/01 13:50, , 70F
12/01 13:50, 70F
噓
12/01 13:50, , 71F
12/01 13:50, 71F
→
12/01 13:51, , 72F
12/01 13:51, 72F
→
12/01 13:51, , 73F
12/01 13:51, 73F
→
12/01 13:52, , 74F
12/01 13:52, 74F
推
12/01 13:53, , 75F
12/01 13:53, 75F
→
12/01 13:56, , 76F
12/01 13:56, 76F
→
12/01 13:59, , 77F
12/01 13:59, 77F
推
12/01 14:01, , 78F
12/01 14:01, 78F
推
12/01 14:04, , 79F
12/01 14:04, 79F
→
12/01 14:04, , 80F
12/01 14:04, 80F
→
12/01 14:04, , 81F
12/01 14:04, 81F
→
12/01 14:04, , 82F
12/01 14:04, 82F
→
12/01 14:04, , 83F
12/01 14:04, 83F
→
12/01 14:04, , 84F
12/01 14:04, 84F
→
12/01 14:04, , 85F
12/01 14:04, 85F
→
12/01 14:04, , 86F
12/01 14:04, 86F
→
12/01 14:04, , 87F
12/01 14:04, 87F
→
12/01 14:05, , 88F
12/01 14:05, 88F
→
12/01 14:05, , 89F
12/01 14:05, 89F
→
12/01 14:22, , 90F
12/01 14:22, 90F
噓
12/01 14:29, , 91F
12/01 14:29, 91F
→
12/01 14:33, , 92F
12/01 14:33, 92F
→
12/01 14:51, , 93F
12/01 14:51, 93F
→
12/01 14:52, , 94F
12/01 14:52, 94F
→
12/01 14:55, , 95F
12/01 14:55, 95F
→
12/01 14:55, , 96F
12/01 14:55, 96F
推
12/01 15:01, , 97F
12/01 15:01, 97F
→
12/01 15:08, , 98F
12/01 15:08, 98F
噓
12/01 15:38, , 99F
12/01 15:38, 99F
推
12/01 15:48, , 100F
12/01 15:48, 100F
→
12/01 15:48, , 101F
12/01 15:48, 101F
推
12/01 17:30, , 102F
12/01 17:30, 102F
噓
12/01 19:03, , 103F
12/01 19:03, 103F
→
12/01 21:24, , 104F
12/01 21:24, 104F
噓
12/01 22:06, , 105F
12/01 22:06, 105F
推
12/01 23:38, , 106F
12/01 23:38, 106F
噓
12/02 00:19, , 107F
12/02 00:19, 107F
討論串 (同標題文章)