[討論] 林書豪如果沒有身材優勢還能在NBA生存嗎?
林書豪身高6-3 (191cm),體重 200 pound(91kg)
跟Westbrook一樣高一樣重
像Chris Paul 只有 6-0 (183cm), 體重 175 pound (79kg)
Curry 跟Rose 都跟豪豪一樣高, 但是體重卻少了10 pound (190 pound)
Tony Parker則是 6-2, 185 pound
所以豪豪這樣的身材跟噸位在控球的位子上算是有優勢的
畢竟籃球真的很講究身材
像幾年前 Deron Williams雖然球技並沒有比CP3強
但他靠著身材優勢在跟Cp3對決時都勝多敗少
常常看豪豪的運球很抖外線也沒特別穩
如果他沒有了身材優勢的話他在NBA還能生存嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 71.177.227.249
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1436776176.A.35C.html
噓
07/13 16:31, , 1F
07/13 16:31, 1F
推
07/13 16:32, , 2F
07/13 16:32, 2F
推
07/13 16:32, , 3F
07/13 16:32, 3F
噓
07/13 16:33, , 4F
07/13 16:33, 4F
噓
07/13 16:34, , 5F
07/13 16:34, 5F
→
07/13 16:34, , 6F
07/13 16:34, 6F
→
07/13 16:34, , 7F
07/13 16:34, 7F
應該是說沒有體能優勢吧. 畢竟豪豪的身材真的比其他控衛都還要大隻
→
07/13 16:36, , 8F
07/13 16:36, 8F
噓
07/13 16:36, , 9F
07/13 16:36, 9F
※ 編輯: sth336 (71.177.227.249), 07/13/2015 16:37:19
推
07/13 16:36, , 10F
07/13 16:36, 10F
推
07/13 16:37, , 11F
07/13 16:37, 11F
噓
07/13 16:37, , 12F
07/13 16:37, 12F
噓
07/13 16:38, , 13F
07/13 16:38, 13F
噓
07/13 16:38, , 14F
07/13 16:38, 14F
→
07/13 16:38, , 15F
07/13 16:38, 15F
沒體能優勢但他大部分控衛都還高跟重還是有身材優勢的阿
→
07/13 16:38, , 16F
07/13 16:38, 16F
※ 編輯: sth336 (71.177.227.249), 07/13/2015 16:40:31
噓
07/13 16:41, , 17F
07/13 16:41, 17F
→
07/13 16:42, , 18F
07/13 16:42, 18F
→
07/13 16:43, , 19F
07/13 16:43, 19F
噓
07/13 16:44, , 20F
07/13 16:44, 20F
推
07/13 16:45, , 21F
07/13 16:45, 21F
噓
07/13 16:45, , 22F
07/13 16:45, 22F
→
07/13 16:46, , 23F
07/13 16:46, 23F
→
07/13 16:47, , 24F
07/13 16:47, 24F
噓
07/13 16:49, , 25F
07/13 16:49, 25F
噓
07/13 16:52, , 26F
07/13 16:52, 26F
推
07/13 16:54, , 27F
07/13 16:54, 27F
推
07/13 16:54, , 28F
07/13 16:54, 28F
→
07/13 16:55, , 29F
07/13 16:55, 29F
噓
07/13 17:01, , 30F
07/13 17:01, 30F
→
07/13 17:01, , 31F
07/13 17:01, 31F
推
07/13 17:04, , 32F
07/13 17:04, 32F
→
07/13 17:05, , 33F
07/13 17:05, 33F
噓
07/13 17:08, , 34F
07/13 17:08, 34F
噓
07/13 17:08, , 35F
07/13 17:08, 35F
→
07/13 17:08, , 36F
07/13 17:08, 36F
噓
07/13 17:14, , 37F
07/13 17:14, 37F
噓
07/13 17:18, , 38F
07/13 17:18, 38F
噓
07/13 17:20, , 39F
07/13 17:20, 39F
噓
07/13 17:25, , 40F
07/13 17:25, 40F
噓
07/13 17:27, , 41F
07/13 17:27, 41F
→
07/13 17:30, , 42F
07/13 17:30, 42F
推
07/13 17:30, , 43F
07/13 17:30, 43F
推
07/13 17:38, , 44F
07/13 17:38, 44F
噓
07/13 17:40, , 45F
07/13 17:40, 45F
推
07/13 17:42, , 46F
07/13 17:42, 46F
噓
07/13 17:43, , 47F
07/13 17:43, 47F
噓
07/13 17:43, , 48F
07/13 17:43, 48F
→
07/13 17:48, , 49F
07/13 17:48, 49F
推
07/13 17:52, , 50F
07/13 17:52, 50F
噓
07/13 18:09, , 51F
07/13 18:09, 51F
噓
07/13 18:25, , 52F
07/13 18:25, 52F
噓
07/13 18:31, , 53F
07/13 18:31, 53F
噓
07/13 18:36, , 54F
07/13 18:36, 54F
噓
07/13 18:36, , 55F
07/13 18:36, 55F
噓
07/13 19:06, , 56F
07/13 19:06, 56F
推
07/13 19:12, , 57F
07/13 19:12, 57F
→
07/13 19:12, , 58F
07/13 19:12, 58F
推
07/13 19:15, , 59F
07/13 19:15, 59F
→
07/13 19:15, , 60F
07/13 19:15, 60F
噓
07/13 19:26, , 61F
07/13 19:26, 61F
噓
07/13 19:26, , 62F
07/13 19:26, 62F
噓
07/13 19:38, , 63F
07/13 19:38, 63F
噓
07/13 19:38, , 64F
07/13 19:38, 64F
噓
07/13 20:22, , 65F
07/13 20:22, 65F
噓
07/13 20:34, , 66F
07/13 20:34, 66F
→
07/13 21:09, , 67F
07/13 21:09, 67F
→
07/13 21:41, , 68F
07/13 21:41, 68F
推
07/13 21:55, , 69F
07/13 21:55, 69F
噓
07/13 21:56, , 70F
07/13 21:56, 70F
噓
07/13 23:47, , 71F
07/13 23:47, 71F
噓
07/14 00:37, , 72F
07/14 00:37, 72F
→
07/14 06:13, , 73F
07/14 06:13, 73F
噓
07/14 07:53, , 74F
07/14 07:53, 74F
噓
07/14 11:24, , 75F
07/14 11:24, 75F
→
07/14 16:32, , 76F
07/14 16:32, 76F
噓
07/14 19:09, , 77F
07/14 19:09, 77F
噓
07/17 16:59, , 78F
07/17 16:59, 78F