[討論] 書豪是怎麼走到這步田地的?
先說我林迷 然後也不熟你蜂,
今年明明就進入大頂薪時代,
我豪就算在湖人被Byron Scott 種族74,
各種冰箱 又不給先發機會,
本季 場均出戰25.8分 拿下11.2分 4.6助攻
也稱得上合格的替補控衛了吧?
現在要簽1年200萬 根本是underpaid,
就算說是搶劫也不為過 (我的觀察啦),
而且我豪還能為黃蜂隊增加在亞洲的曝光機會,
中國的廣大市場當然會是最大客源,
而當初放話說有8 9隊在接洽,
甚至說去公牛當Rose替補也沒問題,
大家一片看好年薪會落在500萬上下,
除非去幾隊沒薪資空間的冠軍候選隊,
當第三套先發 才可能降薪領到300萬以下,
結果最後跑去在東區都沒季後賽打的黃蜂就算了,
現在爆出來的消息 1年才領200萬?
可能還打不了先發...
JJB在小牛都有260萬了,
書豪也正值當打之年,
怎麼會領一個過氣老將的價碼呢?
5樓你說 書豪是怎麼走到這步田地的?
老樣子 理性勿戰
我先去找褲子穿再回來看。
--
Sent from my Android
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.34.1.230
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1436539694.A.07E.html
推
07/10 22:51, , 1F
07/10 22:51, 1F
→
07/10 22:51, , 2F
07/10 22:51, 2F
→
07/10 22:51, , 3F
07/10 22:51, 3F
噓
07/10 22:51, , 4F
07/10 22:51, 4F
---------------------------------
來 五樓請說
→
07/10 22:51, , 5F
07/10 22:51, 5F
---------------------------------
→
07/10 22:51, , 6F
07/10 22:51, 6F
噓
07/10 22:53, , 7F
07/10 22:53, 7F
推
07/10 22:53, , 8F
07/10 22:53, 8F
推
07/10 22:53, , 9F
07/10 22:53, 9F
噓
07/10 22:53, , 10F
07/10 22:53, 10F
→
07/10 22:54, , 11F
07/10 22:54, 11F
→
07/10 22:54, , 12F
07/10 22:54, 12F
推
07/10 22:54, , 13F
07/10 22:54, 13F
噓
07/10 22:55, , 14F
07/10 22:55, 14F
噓
07/10 22:56, , 15F
07/10 22:56, 15F
→
07/10 22:56, , 16F
07/10 22:56, 16F
→
07/10 22:57, , 17F
07/10 22:57, 17F
香波1000萬主要還是防守能力的關係吧
推
07/10 22:57, , 18F
07/10 22:57, 18F
※ 編輯: SiLenUniZak (1.34.1.230), 07/10/2015 22:58:44
噓
07/10 22:58, , 19F
07/10 22:58, 19F
推
07/10 22:58, , 20F
07/10 22:58, 20F
推
07/10 23:00, , 21F
07/10 23:00, 21F
推
07/10 23:03, , 22F
07/10 23:03, 22F
※ 編輯: SiLenUniZak (1.34.1.230), 07/10/2015 23:04:26
※ 編輯: SiLenUniZak (1.34.1.230), 07/10/2015 23:05:11
推
07/10 23:05, , 23F
07/10 23:05, 23F
推
07/10 23:05, , 24F
07/10 23:05, 24F
※ 編輯: SiLenUniZak (1.34.1.230), 07/10/2015 23:05:47
噓
07/10 23:07, , 25F
07/10 23:07, 25F
推
07/10 23:08, , 26F
07/10 23:08, 26F
推
07/10 23:12, , 27F
07/10 23:12, 27F
推
07/10 23:13, , 28F
07/10 23:13, 28F
→
07/10 23:14, , 29F
07/10 23:14, 29F
推
07/10 23:18, , 30F
07/10 23:18, 30F
噓
07/10 23:20, , 31F
07/10 23:20, 31F
噓
07/10 23:22, , 32F
07/10 23:22, 32F
→
07/10 23:22, , 33F
07/10 23:22, 33F
推
07/10 23:23, , 34F
07/10 23:23, 34F
→
07/10 23:23, , 35F
07/10 23:23, 35F
→
07/10 23:24, , 36F
07/10 23:24, 36F
推
07/10 23:24, , 37F
07/10 23:24, 37F
→
07/10 23:25, , 38F
07/10 23:25, 38F
推
07/10 23:26, , 39F
07/10 23:26, 39F
→
07/10 23:29, , 40F
07/10 23:29, 40F
推
07/10 23:40, , 41F
07/10 23:40, 41F
推
07/10 23:42, , 42F
07/10 23:42, 42F
→
07/10 23:43, , 43F
07/10 23:43, 43F
→
07/10 23:49, , 44F
07/10 23:49, 44F
→
07/10 23:50, , 45F
07/10 23:50, 45F
推
07/10 23:51, , 46F
07/10 23:51, 46F
→
07/10 23:51, , 47F
07/10 23:51, 47F
→
07/10 23:52, , 48F
07/10 23:52, 48F
噓
07/10 23:56, , 49F
07/10 23:56, 49F
推
07/11 00:02, , 50F
07/11 00:02, 50F
→
07/11 00:03, , 51F
07/11 00:03, 51F
推
07/11 00:03, , 52F
07/11 00:03, 52F
→
07/11 00:14, , 53F
07/11 00:14, 53F
→
07/11 00:15, , 54F
07/11 00:15, 54F
推
07/11 00:20, , 55F
07/11 00:20, 55F
噓
07/11 00:23, , 56F
07/11 00:23, 56F
噓
07/11 00:42, , 57F
07/11 00:42, 57F
推
07/11 00:45, , 58F
07/11 00:45, 58F
→
07/11 00:45, , 59F
07/11 00:45, 59F
→
07/11 00:45, , 60F
07/11 00:45, 60F
推
07/11 01:07, , 61F
07/11 01:07, 61F
→
07/11 01:08, , 62F
07/11 01:08, 62F
推
07/11 01:14, , 63F
07/11 01:14, 63F
推
07/11 01:43, , 64F
07/11 01:43, 64F
推
07/11 03:49, , 65F
07/11 03:49, 65F
→
07/11 03:49, , 66F
07/11 03:49, 66F
推
07/11 05:12, , 67F
07/11 05:12, 67F
推
07/11 07:24, , 68F
07/11 07:24, 68F
推
07/11 11:11, , 69F
07/11 11:11, 69F
→
07/11 12:50, , 70F
07/11 12:50, 70F
→
07/11 12:50, , 71F
07/11 12:50, 71F
→
07/11 12:50, , 72F
07/11 12:50, 72F
→
07/11 13:01, , 73F
07/11 13:01, 73F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 5 篇):
討論
19
73