Re: [情報] 季後賽要改制了

看板NBA作者ClutchShot (ClutchShot)時間10年前 (2015/06/27 12:23)推噓13(19推 6噓 95→)

留言120則, 28人參與討論串2/3 (看更多)

這次改制的確沒有改到分區問題但要提改革不得不提top16 取前16強這件事絕對不是只有鄉民網路上說說而已!!! 隨便google一下都有... 現行賽制上的不完美是值得大家認真討論的身為一個球迷當然會想看到最強的隊伍出線不是嗎? Adam Silver:NBA needs to look at taking top 16 teams for the playoffs 主席:NBA考慮取前16強進季後賽 “Ultimately we want to see your best teams in the playoffs. And there is an unbalance and a certain unfairness. There is a proposal (from one of the broadcasters)… where the division winners would all automatically go into the playoffs and then you’d seed the next 10 best teams. I think that’s the kind of proposal we need to look at. There are travel issues of course, but in this day in age every team of course has their own plane, travels charter. I don’t think the discussion should end there. And as I’ve said, my first year I was studying a lot of these issues and year 2 is time to take action. It’s something I’m going to look at closely with the competition committee. I do think it’s an area where we need to make a change.” Silver:現行制度的確有不平衡及不公平的問題，現在有一個提案是:各分組第一加上之後的前十強(這樣剛好16隻隊伍)進季後賽，我知道會有travel issues，但是現在大家都有私人飛機，我上任第一年會好好研究這些議題，第二年就會做出行動，我認為這這議題的確是我們有必要改變之處。 BPI: Analyzing a potential top-16 playoff system 前16強季後賽制度分析 (ESPN今年4/3的文章，排名不太一樣，加減看) These changes have big implications for who is likely to make the Finals. Under the current conference system, four teams have a 20 percent or better chance of making the NBA Finals -- the Warriors, Spurs, Hawks and Cavaliers. Meanwhile, based on 10,000 simulations of the top-16 system, the Warriors' odds of making the finals go from 50 percent to 57 percent, and only the Spurs (36 percent) and Clippers (26 percent) have more than a 20 percent chance of getting to the Finals. The path for the top teams in the West would become easier, and the path for the top of the East would become much harder. The Hawks, for example, would probably be the biggest losers in a switch to a top-16 system. They would see their odds of making the Finals drop from 20 percent in the conference system to 10 percent, and their odds of getting out of the first round would drop from 80 percent to 69 percent. The top-16 system does more than boost the West and burden the East, though. It also would make it much more likely that the final two rounds of the playoffs -- the semifinals (currently the conference championship round) and the NBA Finals -- would be played by the best teams in the league. Under the conference system, there is a 66 percent chance that a team outside the top 10 in BPI will be competing in the Eastern Conference finals and a 30 percent chance that a team outside the top 10 will be in the NBA Finals. 現行規則:有四隻球隊有20%以上的機率打進finals 勇士馬刺老鷹騎士若改制取前16強:只剩三隻球隊有20%以上機率而勇士機率從50->57% 馬刺36% 快艇26% 改制後西區攻頂的難度下降，東區則上升，老鷹可能會是影響最大的球隊，打進finals的機會從20%掉到10%，進第二輪的機會從80%掉到69% 改制後最後兩輪(semifinals 原本的分區冠軍戰)將更有機會由真正最好的球隊較量，現行制度有66%機率有球隊在BPI前10以外打進東冠，有30%機率有球隊在BPI前10以外打進總冠。 -- 主席跟ESPN，我想應該夠權威了吧? 講很多次了，再講幾次也無妨扯分區是傳統、三大運動都有分區請問其他運動有像NBA每隊都會對戰到嗎? 有分區沒錯啦，但不像美聯國聯只有跨聯盟才打得到扯距離太遠再算一次給大家看 29*2=58 82-58=24 假設要平均對戰 24場裡面12場客場去微調而已移動距離當然有機會更遠但主席都說了這不是大問題你去問西區老闆們願不願意多花油錢換來更大機會進finals Cuban一定舉雙手贊成說真的也不是一定要虧LBJ 只是剛好他是最大的靶而已如果今天剛好是公牛年年打進總冠可能就是Rose被酸... 而且哪個球星不被虧的迷迷們可以不要這麼玻璃心嗎要辯解當然可以但請不要理直氣壯講一些不實際的或是只會罵詹酸然後迴避問題好像這件事不值得討論取前16強跟LBJ沒有關係就只是想要更加公平啊... 看看快艇跟馬刺多衰洨第一輪就有一隻要say bye bye 他們打出來的比賽不精彩嗎? 拍謝 1st-round!! -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 122.117.206.161 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1435379009.A.7B7.html

→

qhaabk

06/27 12:24, , 1^F

06/27 12:24, 1^F

→

qhaabk

06/27 12:25, , 2^F

06/27 12:25, 2^F

推

MidoriG

06/27 12:26, , 3^F

06/27 12:26, 3^F

→