[討論] 當年公牛解體 高層是在想什麼 ???
聽說當年公牛六冠後解體是因為高層不想花大錢 想直接重建
MJ回憶錄也講過 除了封館因素外
假如當年沒有解體
其實MJ也還想再打幾年
所以為什麼當年公牛隊高層不惜解體冠軍隊 也要重建阿
是認為自己經營手段很高明 一定能重建出另一個公牛隊嗎??
不然當年公牛是全球知名的球隊 如日中天
商業效益應該也不少
像現在幾支隊伍
湖人的kobe 騎士的LBJ KI 馬刺的TD
基本上
正常想法都會想留下核心吧
除非整個爛掉
不然有戰力 有能力的陣容 主將 怎麼會就任他解體呢
NBA是商業職籃 難道有更高追求的利益在嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 180.176.25.241
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1433171615.A.B76.html
推
06/01 23:14, , 1F
06/01 23:14, 1F
→
06/01 23:16, , 2F
06/01 23:16, 2F
→
06/01 23:17, , 3F
06/01 23:17, 3F
推
06/01 23:18, , 4F
06/01 23:18, 4F
推
06/01 23:20, , 5F
06/01 23:20, 5F
→
06/01 23:21, , 6F
06/01 23:21, 6F
→
06/01 23:21, , 7F
06/01 23:21, 7F
推
06/01 23:22, , 8F
06/01 23:22, 8F
推
06/01 23:37, , 9F
06/01 23:37, 9F
→
06/01 23:37, , 10F
06/01 23:37, 10F
→
06/01 23:38, , 11F
06/01 23:38, 11F
推
06/01 23:39, , 12F
06/01 23:39, 12F
推
06/01 23:41, , 13F
06/01 23:41, 13F
→
06/01 23:42, , 14F
06/01 23:42, 14F
推
06/01 23:42, , 15F
06/01 23:42, 15F
→
06/01 23:43, , 16F
06/01 23:43, 16F
推
06/01 23:44, , 17F
06/01 23:44, 17F
→
06/01 23:44, , 18F
06/01 23:44, 18F
→
06/01 23:45, , 19F
06/01 23:45, 19F
→
06/01 23:45, , 20F
06/01 23:45, 20F
→
06/01 23:48, , 21F
06/01 23:48, 21F
推
06/01 23:48, , 22F
06/01 23:48, 22F
→
06/01 23:54, , 23F
06/01 23:54, 23F
推
06/01 23:58, , 24F
06/01 23:58, 24F
→
06/01 23:59, , 25F
06/01 23:59, 25F
→
06/01 23:59, , 26F
06/01 23:59, 26F
→
06/02 00:00, , 27F
06/02 00:00, 27F
→
06/02 00:01, , 28F
06/02 00:01, 28F
推
06/02 00:13, , 29F
06/02 00:13, 29F
推
06/02 00:24, , 30F
06/02 00:24, 30F
推
06/02 00:26, , 31F
06/02 00:26, 31F
→
06/02 00:26, , 32F
06/02 00:26, 32F
→
06/02 00:26, , 33F
06/02 00:26, 33F
推
06/02 00:28, , 34F
06/02 00:28, 34F
推
06/02 00:31, , 35F
06/02 00:31, 35F
→
06/02 00:32, , 36F
06/02 00:32, 36F
推
06/02 00:55, , 37F
06/02 00:55, 37F
→
06/02 00:55, , 38F
06/02 00:55, 38F
→
06/02 00:55, , 39F
06/02 00:55, 39F
→
06/02 00:55, , 40F
06/02 00:55, 40F
→
06/02 00:55, , 41F
06/02 00:55, 41F
→
06/02 00:55, , 42F
06/02 00:55, 42F
推
06/02 02:01, , 43F
06/02 02:01, 43F
推
06/02 04:46, , 44F
06/02 04:46, 44F
推
06/02 06:20, , 45F
06/02 06:20, 45F
推
06/02 08:28, , 46F
06/02 08:28, 46F
→
06/02 08:29, , 47F
06/02 08:29, 47F
推
06/02 09:00, , 48F
06/02 09:00, 48F
推
06/02 09:46, , 49F
06/02 09:46, 49F
推
06/02 12:16, , 50F
06/02 12:16, 50F
推
06/02 14:55, , 51F
06/02 14:55, 51F
推
06/02 15:07, , 52F
06/02 15:07, 52F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):