[討論] 若上季火箭陣容拿來對本季快艇是否好些?
今年季後賽第二輪看到現在
感覺火箭真的是八支球隊中感覺競爭力最弱的..
特別是對到快艇.整個把火箭的問題都打出來原形畢露了
雖然火箭本來就不是個人鍾愛的球隊
但真的會不禁比一下:
如果是去年的火箭
打這個系列..會不會至少有些競爭力呢?
列一下這兩年的主力:
2013-2014 PLAYOFF
James Harden
Chandler Parsons
Dwight Howard
Patrick Beverley
Jeremy Lin
Omer Asik
Terrence Jones
Troy Daniels
Francisco Garcia
------------------------
Omri Casspi (可輪替的備案)
Donatas Motiejunas (可輪替的備案)
2014-2015 PLAYOFF
Trevor Ariza
James Harden
Dwight Howard
Jason Terry
Corey Brewer
Terrence Jones
Josh Smith
Pablo Prigioni
Clint Capela
Nick Johnson
Kostas Papanikolaou
Joey Dorsey
---------------------------
Patrick Beverley (INJ)
Donatas Motiejunas (INJ)
今年季後賽先發幾名主力中固然天空貝受傷沒打
但鬍子,DH,TJ及教練都沒變.戰術也差不多
可是比起去年.人員有些出入
認真說像Corey Brewer Jason Terry Ariza 賈詡
換回成阿西.CP25,林書豪. Omri Casspi.跟老賈這些人
陣容跟陣形上有沒有機會打得比較持久~?
(我還蠻懷念老賈在側翼組的討人厭干擾能減輕後場防守壓力)
雖說千金難買早知道.但閒聊看看~
畢竟維持建隊也很怕碰到這種
調完陣容後結果遠不如預期的狀況
也希望火箭未來不要再發生想調整好陣容,但最後結果不如預期
接著季外檢討現有陣容.繼續換人~甚至緬懷之前的憾事了~~
這種無限輪迴其實對球隊不是好事
--
18057 24 2/25 ismyname □ [討論] 是不是演出名的歷史人物比較容易得獎
推
02/25 13:04,
02/25 13:04
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.240.189.156
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1431349797.A.781.html
※ 編輯: nuturewind (111.240.189.156), 05/11/2015 21:11:45
→
05/11 21:11, , 1F
05/11 21:11, 1F
→
05/11 21:11, , 2F
05/11 21:11, 2F
推
05/11 21:12, , 3F
05/11 21:12, 3F
→
05/11 21:12, , 4F
05/11 21:12, 4F
→
05/11 21:12, , 5F
05/11 21:12, 5F
推
05/11 21:12, , 6F
05/11 21:12, 6F
→
05/11 21:12, , 7F
05/11 21:12, 7F
→
05/11 21:12, , 8F
05/11 21:12, 8F
→
05/11 21:13, , 9F
05/11 21:13, 9F
→
05/11 21:13, , 10F
05/11 21:13, 10F
→
05/11 21:13, , 11F
05/11 21:13, 11F
→
05/11 21:13, , 12F
05/11 21:13, 12F
推
05/11 21:14, , 13F
05/11 21:14, 13F
→
05/11 21:14, , 14F
05/11 21:14, 14F
→
05/11 21:15, , 15F
05/11 21:15, 15F
→
05/11 21:15, , 16F
05/11 21:15, 16F
推
05/11 21:15, , 17F
05/11 21:15, 17F
→
05/11 21:15, , 18F
05/11 21:15, 18F
→
05/11 21:16, , 19F
05/11 21:16, 19F
推
05/11 21:16, , 20F
05/11 21:16, 20F
→
05/11 21:16, , 21F
05/11 21:16, 21F
推
05/11 21:16, , 22F
05/11 21:16, 22F
推
05/11 21:17, , 23F
05/11 21:17, 23F
推
05/11 21:17, , 24F
05/11 21:17, 24F
→
05/11 21:18, , 25F
05/11 21:18, 25F
老賈的作用像MB
所以我不禁會想若火箭陣容是去年那種
有老賈在像那樣去攪和對方後場前場影響他們情緒
對火箭的進攻體系會不會比較好~
而且還有阿西的籃板保護.DH比現在壓力會輕超多的吧~
另外CP25.Lin乃至冰箱不是很愛用的以色列高以翔~
其實在進攻上都有不同的幫助球隊作用~覺得打快艇或許會比好一些就是
※ 編輯: nuturewind (111.240.189.156), 05/11/2015 21:20:47
→
05/11 21:18, , 26F
05/11 21:18, 26F
→
05/11 21:18, , 27F
05/11 21:18, 27F
→
05/11 21:18, , 28F
05/11 21:18, 28F
→
05/11 21:19, , 29F
05/11 21:19, 29F
推
05/11 21:20, , 30F
05/11 21:20, 30F
※ 編輯: nuturewind (111.240.189.156), 05/11/2015 21:23:14
推
05/11 21:21, , 31F
05/11 21:21, 31F
→
05/11 21:22, , 32F
05/11 21:22, 32F
推
05/11 21:22, , 33F
05/11 21:22, 33F
→
05/11 21:22, , 34F
05/11 21:22, 34F
→
05/11 21:24, , 35F
05/11 21:24, 35F
還有 21 則推文
還有 2 段內文
→
05/11 21:31, , 57F
05/11 21:31, 57F
推
05/11 21:32, , 58F
05/11 21:32, 58F
→
05/11 21:32, , 59F
05/11 21:32, 59F
→
05/11 21:33, , 60F
05/11 21:33, 60F
推
05/11 21:34, , 61F
05/11 21:34, 61F
→
05/11 21:34, , 62F
05/11 21:34, 62F
推
05/11 21:35, , 63F
05/11 21:35, 63F
推
05/11 21:37, , 64F
05/11 21:37, 64F
推
05/11 21:38, , 65F
05/11 21:38, 65F
→
05/11 21:40, , 66F
05/11 21:40, 66F
噓
05/11 21:44, , 67F
05/11 21:44, 67F
推
05/11 21:44, , 68F
05/11 21:44, 68F
推
05/11 21:48, , 69F
05/11 21:48, 69F
→
05/11 21:48, , 70F
05/11 21:48, 70F
→
05/11 21:49, , 71F
05/11 21:49, 71F
→
05/11 21:50, , 72F
05/11 21:50, 72F
推
05/11 21:50, , 73F
05/11 21:50, 73F
去年有看阿...季後賽有轉播工作有閒暇一定會看~
老賈就是因為受傷使用才會比較保留阿.如果沒傷的狀態下用原陣容打今年
他的防守會很重要
推
05/11 21:51, , 74F
05/11 21:51, 74F
→
05/11 21:51, , 75F
05/11 21:51, 75F
→
05/11 21:52, , 76F
05/11 21:52, 76F
→
05/11 21:52, , 77F
05/11 21:52, 77F
→
05/11 21:52, , 78F
05/11 21:52, 78F
→
05/11 21:53, , 79F
05/11 21:53, 79F
→
05/11 21:53, , 80F
05/11 21:53, 80F
※ 編輯: nuturewind (111.240.189.156), 05/11/2015 21:56:29
→
05/11 21:55, , 81F
05/11 21:55, 81F
→
05/11 21:55, , 82F
05/11 21:55, 82F
推
05/11 21:58, , 83F
05/11 21:58, 83F
→
05/11 21:58, , 84F
05/11 21:58, 84F
→
05/11 22:00, , 85F
05/11 22:00, 85F
推
05/11 22:07, , 86F
05/11 22:07, 86F
推
05/11 22:23, , 87F
05/11 22:23, 87F
推
05/11 22:42, , 88F
05/11 22:42, 88F
→
05/11 22:53, , 89F
05/11 22:53, 89F
推
05/11 23:54, , 90F
05/11 23:54, 90F
推
05/12 00:08, , 91F
05/12 00:08, 91F
→
05/12 00:08, , 92F
05/12 00:08, 92F
推
05/12 00:43, , 93F
05/12 00:43, 93F
→
05/13 07:30, , 94F
05/13 07:30, 94F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):