Re: [BOX ] Clippers 106:78 Lakers 數據
: ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
: │Los Angeles Lakers (20-56) ◢███████████████████│
: │PLAYERS MIN FGM-A 3PM-A FTM-A +/- OR DR TR AS PF ST TO BS BA PTS EFF│
: ├─────────────────────────────────────┤
: │J. Lin G 17:25 2-8 0-2 2-2 - 7 1 0 1 2 3 0 3 0 1 6 0│
: │Clarkson G 26:18 1-6 0-3 0-0 -17 2 2 4 3 2 0 2 0 0 2 2│
: └─────────────────────────────────────┘
這幾場,林表現不好
有可能是身體欠佳 也有可能是手感問題
但是我比較好奇的是:Clarkson真的是湖人贏球的選項嗎?
林手感不好的期間 湖人雖然也有贏一場
Clarkson這幾場(除了今天)也都爆發
但是,有Clarkson不等於贏球
全隊的隊形、球的傳導一團亂
明年老大回來 需要的是一個會傳助攻給老大得分的人
因此湖人控衛得分不需太高 但是要會組織
Clarkson會是這樣的人嗎?
雖然敗總信誓旦旦的說看好Clarkson的潛力
但是只能當敗處的控衛 問題也滿大的
還是說,真的像媒體預料的 讓Clarkson狂刷數據是為了賣個好價錢?
敗總的用人,問題很大
全隊離心離德的
季前,已經很多明星不願去火箭、湖人了
今年敗總剛來 更為了老大一人 讓全隊其他人數據很難看
而且除了老大外 湖人目前明星球員=0
今年季後 會有明星球員敢來湖人當老大的配菜嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 42.66.228.1
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1428297347.A.9F8.html
推
04/06 13:16, , 1F
04/06 13:16, 1F
→
04/06 13:17, , 2F
04/06 13:17, 2F
推
04/06 13:17, , 3F
04/06 13:17, 3F
推
04/06 13:18, , 4F
04/06 13:18, 4F
→
04/06 13:18, , 5F
04/06 13:18, 5F
→
04/06 13:18, , 6F
04/06 13:18, 6F
推
04/06 13:18, , 7F
04/06 13:18, 7F
→
04/06 13:19, , 8F
04/06 13:19, 8F
→
04/06 13:20, , 9F
04/06 13:20, 9F
→
04/06 13:20, , 10F
04/06 13:20, 10F
→
04/06 13:20, , 11F
04/06 13:20, 11F
推
04/06 13:21, , 12F
04/06 13:21, 12F
推
04/06 13:21, , 13F
04/06 13:21, 13F
→
04/06 13:22, , 14F
04/06 13:22, 14F
→
04/06 13:22, , 15F
04/06 13:22, 15F
推
04/06 13:23, , 16F
04/06 13:23, 16F
→
04/06 13:23, , 17F
04/06 13:23, 17F
推
04/06 13:26, , 18F
04/06 13:26, 18F
→
04/06 13:26, , 19F
04/06 13:26, 19F
→
04/06 13:26, , 20F
04/06 13:26, 20F
推
04/06 13:26, , 21F
04/06 13:26, 21F
→
04/06 13:27, , 22F
04/06 13:27, 22F
→
04/06 13:28, , 23F
04/06 13:28, 23F
推
04/06 13:29, , 24F
04/06 13:29, 24F
→
04/06 13:30, , 25F
04/06 13:30, 25F
→
04/06 13:31, , 26F
04/06 13:31, 26F
推
04/06 13:31, , 27F
04/06 13:31, 27F
推
04/06 13:32, , 28F
04/06 13:32, 28F
推
04/06 13:37, , 29F
04/06 13:37, 29F
→
04/06 13:38, , 30F
04/06 13:38, 30F
噓
04/06 13:38, , 31F
04/06 13:38, 31F
→
04/06 13:39, , 32F
04/06 13:39, 32F
推
04/06 13:44, , 33F
04/06 13:44, 33F
→
04/06 13:45, , 34F
04/06 13:45, 34F
推
04/06 13:45, , 35F
04/06 13:45, 35F
→
04/06 13:45, , 36F
04/06 13:45, 36F
→
04/06 13:46, , 37F
04/06 13:46, 37F
噓
04/06 13:46, , 38F
04/06 13:46, 38F
推
04/06 14:00, , 39F
04/06 14:00, 39F
→
04/06 14:00, , 40F
04/06 14:00, 40F
推
04/06 14:01, , 41F
04/06 14:01, 41F
→
04/06 14:01, , 42F
04/06 14:01, 42F
→
04/06 14:02, , 43F
04/06 14:02, 43F
噓
04/06 14:06, , 44F
04/06 14:06, 44F
噓
04/06 14:10, , 45F
04/06 14:10, 45F
→
04/06 14:10, , 46F
04/06 14:10, 46F
→
04/06 14:15, , 47F
04/06 14:15, 47F
推
04/06 14:16, , 48F
04/06 14:16, 48F
→
04/06 14:17, , 49F
04/06 14:17, 49F
推
04/06 14:21, , 50F
04/06 14:21, 50F
推
04/06 14:24, , 51F
04/06 14:24, 51F
推
04/06 14:26, , 52F
04/06 14:26, 52F
→
04/06 14:27, , 53F
04/06 14:27, 53F
→
04/06 14:27, , 54F
04/06 14:27, 54F
推
04/06 14:29, , 55F
04/06 14:29, 55F
→
04/06 14:29, , 56F
04/06 14:29, 56F
推
04/06 14:45, , 57F
04/06 14:45, 57F
→
04/06 14:45, , 58F
04/06 14:45, 58F
推
04/06 14:57, , 59F
04/06 14:57, 59F
→
04/06 14:58, , 60F
04/06 14:58, 60F
→
04/06 14:59, , 61F
04/06 14:59, 61F
噓
04/06 15:24, , 62F
04/06 15:24, 62F
推
04/06 15:53, , 63F
04/06 15:53, 63F
→
04/06 17:17, , 64F
04/06 17:17, 64F
→
04/06 17:48, , 65F
04/06 17:48, 65F
推
04/06 19:16, , 66F
04/06 19:16, 66F
討論串 (同標題文章)