[討論] melo能被稱做明星球員的原因?
談到聯盟頂尖的明星球員,melo的名字常常被提及
即使尼克這隻隊伍像扶不起的阿斗,有關尼克和melo的討論也不曾少過
同時melo也是許多大咖球星的好麻吉,各種合體的傳聞不窮
說Melo是明星球員很少人會反駁的
我想知道的是,究竟是哪一個原因讓melo能被稱做明星球員???
1。戰績!? 尼克爛成這樣不可能
2。刷數據!?
許多刷數據的達人都沒有受到同樣的評價和關注
例如恐怖數據的灰狼Love 因為戰績而為人詬病 被笑刷數據
而melo則會有人說他是真實力 只是隊友不給力
還有很多不受關注的球員像是Ty Lawson
年年進步 金塊的穩定支柱
生涯 14.4 PTS -- 6.5 AST -- 2.9 REB -- 1.2 STL
今年 16.5 PTS -- 9.8 AST -- 3.2 REB -- 1.3 STL
這種控衛數據 卻幾乎沒有聽過任何關於他的討論
為什麼同樣是爛隊刷數據,評價差那麼多?
3。紐約大蘋果
因為媒體所以超高曝光率,紐約之子悲劇英雄
還有紐約與許多名人歌星大量接觸,知名度高
如果Love或Ty Lawson跟melo互換球隊,melo還會有今天這種地位嗎?
4。特別事蹟?
像是62分或季後賽表現(咦?
各人覺得3最合理,就是紐約加持吧
就像是紐約人不管什麼球迷都會討論洋基隊一樣的道理吧!?
大家覺得是什麼原因呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 173.57.98.219
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1425179686.A.48D.html
→
03/01 11:17, , 1F
03/01 11:17, 1F
噓
03/01 11:17, , 2F
03/01 11:17, 2F
→
03/01 11:17, , 3F
03/01 11:17, 3F
推
03/01 11:17, , 4F
03/01 11:17, 4F
推
03/01 11:18, , 5F
03/01 11:18, 5F
→
03/01 11:18, , 6F
03/01 11:18, 6F
→
03/01 11:20, , 7F
03/01 11:20, 7F
噓
03/01 11:21, , 8F
03/01 11:21, 8F
推
03/01 11:21, , 9F
03/01 11:21, 9F
推
03/01 11:22, , 10F
03/01 11:22, 10F
→
03/01 11:24, , 11F
03/01 11:24, 11F
→
03/01 11:24, , 12F
03/01 11:24, 12F
噓
03/01 11:24, , 13F
03/01 11:24, 13F
→
03/01 11:25, , 14F
03/01 11:25, 14F
推
03/01 11:25, , 15F
03/01 11:25, 15F
→
03/01 11:25, , 16F
03/01 11:25, 16F
推
03/01 11:25, , 17F
03/01 11:25, 17F
噓
03/01 11:26, , 18F
03/01 11:26, 18F
噓
03/01 11:26, , 19F
03/01 11:26, 19F
噓
03/01 11:26, , 20F
03/01 11:26, 20F
→
03/01 11:27, , 21F
03/01 11:27, 21F
推
03/01 11:27, , 22F
03/01 11:27, 22F
噓
03/01 11:28, , 23F
03/01 11:28, 23F
推
03/01 11:29, , 24F
03/01 11:29, 24F
推
03/01 11:29, , 25F
03/01 11:29, 25F
噓
03/01 11:29, , 26F
03/01 11:29, 26F
→
03/01 11:30, , 27F
03/01 11:30, 27F
→
03/01 11:30, , 28F
03/01 11:30, 28F
噓
03/01 11:30, , 29F
03/01 11:30, 29F
推
03/01 11:31, , 30F
03/01 11:31, 30F
推
03/01 11:31, , 31F
03/01 11:31, 31F
→
03/01 11:31, , 32F
03/01 11:31, 32F
→
03/01 11:33, , 33F
03/01 11:33, 33F
推
03/01 11:34, , 34F
03/01 11:34, 34F
推
03/01 11:35, , 35F
03/01 11:35, 35F
噓
03/01 11:37, , 36F
03/01 11:37, 36F
→
03/01 11:41, , 37F
03/01 11:41, 37F
→
03/01 11:41, , 38F
03/01 11:41, 38F
推
03/01 11:41, , 39F
03/01 11:41, 39F
還有 148 則推文
噓
03/01 13:55, , 188F
03/01 13:55, 188F
→
03/01 13:56, , 189F
03/01 13:56, 189F
噓
03/01 13:56, , 190F
03/01 13:56, 190F
→
03/01 13:58, , 191F
03/01 13:58, 191F
噓
03/01 13:58, , 192F
03/01 13:58, 192F
→
03/01 13:58, , 193F
03/01 13:58, 193F
→
03/01 13:59, , 194F
03/01 13:59, 194F
→
03/01 13:59, , 195F
03/01 13:59, 195F
→
03/01 14:00, , 196F
03/01 14:00, 196F
→
03/01 14:00, , 197F
03/01 14:00, 197F
→
03/01 14:05, , 198F
03/01 14:05, 198F
→
03/01 14:14, , 199F
03/01 14:14, 199F
推
03/01 14:17, , 200F
03/01 14:17, 200F
→
03/01 14:19, , 201F
03/01 14:19, 201F
推
03/01 14:24, , 202F
03/01 14:24, 202F
→
03/01 14:24, , 203F
03/01 14:24, 203F
→
03/01 14:24, , 204F
03/01 14:24, 204F
噓
03/01 14:26, , 205F
03/01 14:26, 205F
→
03/01 14:30, , 206F
03/01 14:30, 206F
噓
03/01 14:38, , 207F
03/01 14:38, 207F
噓
03/01 14:44, , 208F
03/01 14:44, 208F
噓
03/01 14:48, , 209F
03/01 14:48, 209F
噓
03/01 14:53, , 210F
03/01 14:53, 210F
噓
03/01 15:05, , 211F
03/01 15:05, 211F
推
03/01 15:13, , 212F
03/01 15:13, 212F
噓
03/01 15:43, , 213F
03/01 15:43, 213F
噓
03/01 15:51, , 214F
03/01 15:51, 214F
噓
03/01 16:08, , 215F
03/01 16:08, 215F
推
03/01 16:09, , 216F
03/01 16:09, 216F
→
03/01 16:09, , 217F
03/01 16:09, 217F
推
03/01 16:43, , 218F
03/01 16:43, 218F
推
03/01 17:29, , 219F
03/01 17:29, 219F
→
03/01 18:07, , 220F
03/01 18:07, 220F
推
03/01 19:27, , 221F
03/01 19:27, 221F
噓
03/01 19:37, , 222F
03/01 19:37, 222F
噓
03/01 19:51, , 223F
03/01 19:51, 223F
→
03/01 22:53, , 224F
03/01 22:53, 224F
→
03/01 23:53, , 225F
03/01 23:53, 225F
推
03/02 01:50, , 226F
03/02 01:50, 226F
噓
03/02 11:20, , 227F
03/02 11:20, 227F
討論串 (同標題文章)