[討論] 同樣是打鐵 ai的評價為什麼會比kobe高
kobe跟iverson一樣
都是自幹球風
kobe雖然生涯後期難堪 但是早期是頂尖sg是不容質疑的
生涯45%命中率不高也不低
allen iverson則是在crossover做到登峰造極
把crossover帶到籃球的最高殿堂
生涯遭逢大小傷 命中率只有42%
兩人同樣不是打體能球的
沒有像依靠體能球的選手在生涯後期快速退化
都是在技巧上琢磨的選手
為什麼命中率偏低的iverson評價會比kobe還高呢
是因為新秀年吃jordan那一次還有在季後賽一勝嗎
--
Sent from my Android
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.253.199.103
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1425134119.A.EBB.html
→
02/28 22:36, , 1F
02/28 22:36, 1F
推
02/28 22:36, , 2F
02/28 22:36, 2F
→
02/28 22:36, , 3F
02/28 22:36, 3F
→
02/28 22:36, , 4F
02/28 22:36, 4F
推
02/28 22:36, , 5F
02/28 22:36, 5F
推
02/28 22:37, , 6F
02/28 22:37, 6F
→
02/28 22:37, , 7F
02/28 22:37, 7F
推
02/28 22:37, , 8F
02/28 22:37, 8F
→
02/28 22:37, , 9F
02/28 22:37, 9F
推
02/28 22:37, , 10F
02/28 22:37, 10F
→
02/28 22:38, , 11F
02/28 22:38, 11F
→
02/28 22:38, , 12F
02/28 22:38, 12F
推
02/28 22:38, , 13F
02/28 22:38, 13F
→
02/28 22:38, , 14F
02/28 22:38, 14F
推
02/28 22:39, , 15F
02/28 22:39, 15F
噓
02/28 22:39, , 16F
02/28 22:39, 16F
推
02/28 22:39, , 17F
02/28 22:39, 17F
→
02/28 22:40, , 18F
02/28 22:40, 18F
→
02/28 22:40, , 19F
02/28 22:40, 19F
推
02/28 22:41, , 20F
02/28 22:41, 20F
→
02/28 22:41, , 21F
02/28 22:41, 21F
推
02/28 22:41, , 22F
02/28 22:41, 22F
推
02/28 22:42, , 23F
02/28 22:42, 23F
推
02/28 22:42, , 24F
02/28 22:42, 24F
推
02/28 22:42, , 25F
02/28 22:42, 25F
→
02/28 22:42, , 26F
02/28 22:42, 26F
推
02/28 22:42, , 27F
02/28 22:42, 27F
→
02/28 22:43, , 28F
02/28 22:43, 28F
→
02/28 22:43, , 29F
02/28 22:43, 29F
推
02/28 22:43, , 30F
02/28 22:43, 30F
→
02/28 22:44, , 31F
02/28 22:44, 31F
推
02/28 22:45, , 32F
02/28 22:45, 32F
→
02/28 22:45, , 33F
02/28 22:45, 33F
推
02/28 22:45, , 34F
02/28 22:45, 34F
推
02/28 22:46, , 35F
02/28 22:46, 35F
→
02/28 22:47, , 36F
02/28 22:47, 36F
推
02/28 22:47, , 37F
02/28 22:47, 37F
→
02/28 22:47, , 38F
02/28 22:47, 38F
→
02/28 22:48, , 39F
02/28 22:48, 39F
還有 215 則推文
推
03/01 09:15, , 255F
03/01 09:15, 255F
→
03/01 09:16, , 256F
03/01 09:16, 256F
推
03/01 09:23, , 257F
03/01 09:23, 257F
→
03/01 09:30, , 258F
03/01 09:30, 258F
噓
03/01 09:49, , 259F
03/01 09:49, 259F
推
03/01 09:53, , 260F
03/01 09:53, 260F
推
03/01 10:03, , 261F
03/01 10:03, 261F
→
03/01 10:03, , 262F
03/01 10:03, 262F
→
03/01 10:04, , 263F
03/01 10:04, 263F
噓
03/01 10:09, , 264F
03/01 10:09, 264F
推
03/01 10:35, , 265F
03/01 10:35, 265F
→
03/01 10:35, , 266F
03/01 10:35, 266F
噓
03/01 10:51, , 267F
03/01 10:51, 267F
推
03/01 11:10, , 268F
03/01 11:10, 268F
→
03/01 11:10, , 269F
03/01 11:10, 269F
推
03/01 11:13, , 270F
03/01 11:13, 270F
噓
03/01 11:20, , 271F
03/01 11:20, 271F
→
03/01 11:21, , 272F
03/01 11:21, 272F
→
03/01 11:44, , 273F
03/01 11:44, 273F
→
03/01 11:44, , 274F
03/01 11:44, 274F
→
03/01 11:44, , 275F
03/01 11:44, 275F
噓
03/01 11:49, , 276F
03/01 11:49, 276F
→
03/01 11:58, , 277F
03/01 11:58, 277F
→
03/01 11:59, , 278F
03/01 11:59, 278F
推
03/01 12:53, , 279F
03/01 12:53, 279F
噓
03/01 13:00, , 280F
03/01 13:00, 280F
→
03/01 13:01, , 281F
03/01 13:01, 281F
推
03/01 13:03, , 282F
03/01 13:03, 282F
推
03/01 15:06, , 283F
03/01 15:06, 283F
推
03/01 16:52, , 284F
03/01 16:52, 284F
→
03/01 16:53, , 285F
03/01 16:53, 285F
→
03/01 16:54, , 286F
03/01 16:54, 286F
推
03/01 17:52, , 287F
03/01 17:52, 287F
推
03/01 18:36, , 288F
03/01 18:36, 288F
→
03/01 18:38, , 289F
03/01 18:38, 289F
噓
03/01 19:19, , 290F
03/01 19:19, 290F
推
03/01 20:18, , 291F
03/01 20:18, 291F
→
03/01 21:00, , 292F
03/01 21:00, 292F
噓
03/02 19:22, , 293F
03/02 19:22, 293F
→
03/02 19:23, , 294F
03/02 19:23, 294F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 8 篇):