Re: [討論] 大家心中的抱腿王是?
※ 引述《leejitsong (洋蔥)》之銘言:
: 認真回一下。有人定義了抱腿的定義,但那定義有很大問題。
: 為何詹詹被說抱腿?不是大叔我貴古賤今,而是90年代的球星真的就是有一副氣慨:今年
: 輸給你,老子明年就要比你強。雖然都敗給了喬皇,但是在盛年之時,沒人會去臣服在別
: 人的膝下,各個都是一方之霸,等到年老氣衰,再配合其他新興霸主,或是幾個老傢伙在
: 一起拚個冠軍。
: 也因此,看看老巴、崔滑、歐拉等,更甚者雷槍、狼王,他們的轉隊大叔我都可以接受,
: 也不會視為抱腿,看看超音速的雷槍、灰狼時期的狼王等,也都為了母隊盡心盡力,賣命
: 演出,等到年華老去,再來撈撈總冠軍。
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
: 但如今的球星都沒了這份氣魄,正當巔峰之期,就想以總冠軍為目標,整天只想找腿抱,
: 也因此,現今的NBA強弱分明,忠誠減少,再也不是想靠著自己拿冠軍,反而想靠別人拿
: ,說是抱腿時代一點也不為過。
你說的大部分看法 我都同意
唯一有問題的地方是在:
所以標準到底是什麼? 只用"你可以接受"帶過嗎? 以你的觀點為基準嗎?
根本沒有說明清楚...
LBJ在騎士好歹也打了兩張約共7年 我是沒看出來他哪裡沒對母隊盡心盡力了
又沒有擺爛 把萬年大爛隊帶成每年的季後賽常客
所謂盡心盡力 是怎麼決定的?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 59.127.247.218
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1424531930.A.CAC.html
推
02/21 23:19, , 1F
02/21 23:19, 1F
→
02/21 23:20, , 2F
02/21 23:20, 2F
→
02/21 23:21, , 3F
02/21 23:21, 3F
推
02/21 23:21, , 4F
02/21 23:21, 4F
推
02/21 23:21, , 5F
02/21 23:21, 5F
→
02/21 23:21, , 6F
02/21 23:21, 6F
→
02/21 23:22, , 7F
02/21 23:22, 7F
→
02/21 23:22, , 8F
02/21 23:22, 8F
推
02/21 23:22, , 9F
02/21 23:22, 9F
→
02/21 23:23, , 10F
02/21 23:23, 10F
推
02/21 23:23, , 11F
02/21 23:23, 11F
→
02/21 23:24, , 12F
02/21 23:24, 12F
→
02/21 23:24, , 13F
02/21 23:24, 13F
→
02/21 23:24, , 14F
02/21 23:24, 14F
→
02/21 23:25, , 15F
02/21 23:25, 15F
→
02/21 23:25, , 16F
02/21 23:25, 16F
推
02/21 23:25, , 17F
02/21 23:25, 17F
推
02/21 23:25, , 18F
02/21 23:25, 18F
→
02/21 23:26, , 19F
02/21 23:26, 19F
→
02/21 23:26, , 20F
02/21 23:26, 20F
→
02/21 23:26, , 21F
02/21 23:26, 21F
推
02/21 23:27, , 22F
02/21 23:27, 22F
推
02/21 23:27, , 23F
02/21 23:27, 23F
推
02/21 23:27, , 24F
02/21 23:27, 24F
→
02/21 23:28, , 25F
02/21 23:28, 25F
→
02/21 23:29, , 26F
02/21 23:29, 26F
→
02/21 23:29, , 27F
02/21 23:29, 27F
推
02/21 23:29, , 28F
02/21 23:29, 28F
→
02/21 23:29, , 29F
02/21 23:29, 29F
→
02/21 23:29, , 30F
02/21 23:29, 30F
→
02/21 23:30, , 31F
02/21 23:30, 31F
推
02/21 23:30, , 32F
02/21 23:30, 32F
→
02/21 23:30, , 33F
02/21 23:30, 33F
→
02/21 23:31, , 34F
02/21 23:31, 34F
→
02/21 23:32, , 35F
02/21 23:32, 35F
推
02/21 23:32, , 36F
02/21 23:32, 36F
推
02/21 23:32, , 37F
02/21 23:32, 37F
推
02/21 23:32, , 38F
02/21 23:32, 38F
→
02/21 23:32, , 39F
02/21 23:32, 39F
還有 140 則推文
→
02/22 00:29, , 180F
02/22 00:29, 180F
推
02/22 00:31, , 181F
02/22 00:31, 181F
推
02/22 00:31, , 182F
02/22 00:31, 182F
→
02/22 00:31, , 183F
02/22 00:31, 183F
推
02/22 00:32, , 184F
02/22 00:32, 184F
推
02/22 00:33, , 185F
02/22 00:33, 185F
→
02/22 00:33, , 186F
02/22 00:33, 186F
→
02/22 00:33, , 187F
02/22 00:33, 187F
推
02/22 00:34, , 188F
02/22 00:34, 188F
→
02/22 00:34, , 189F
02/22 00:34, 189F
→
02/22 00:34, , 190F
02/22 00:34, 190F
推
02/22 00:35, , 191F
02/22 00:35, 191F
→
02/22 00:35, , 192F
02/22 00:35, 192F
推
02/22 00:39, , 193F
02/22 00:39, 193F
→
02/22 00:39, , 194F
02/22 00:39, 194F
噓
02/22 00:42, , 195F
02/22 00:42, 195F
推
02/22 01:05, , 196F
02/22 01:05, 196F
推
02/22 01:23, , 197F
02/22 01:23, 197F
噓
02/22 01:28, , 198F
02/22 01:28, 198F
推
02/22 01:44, , 199F
02/22 01:44, 199F
推
02/22 02:26, , 200F
02/22 02:26, 200F
推
02/22 02:41, , 201F
02/22 02:41, 201F
→
02/22 02:42, , 202F
02/22 02:42, 202F
推
02/22 02:58, , 203F
02/22 02:58, 203F
推
02/22 03:04, , 204F
02/22 03:04, 204F
→
02/22 03:05, , 205F
02/22 03:05, 205F
推
02/22 03:47, , 206F
02/22 03:47, 206F
→
02/22 03:47, , 207F
02/22 03:47, 207F
→
02/22 03:49, , 208F
02/22 03:49, 208F
→
02/22 03:50, , 209F
02/22 03:50, 209F
→
02/22 03:51, , 210F
02/22 03:51, 210F
→
02/22 03:52, , 211F
02/22 03:52, 211F
推
02/22 03:55, , 212F
02/22 03:55, 212F
推
02/22 06:46, , 213F
02/22 06:46, 213F
推
02/22 06:55, , 214F
02/22 06:55, 214F
噓
02/22 08:41, , 215F
02/22 08:41, 215F
→
02/22 20:44, , 216F
02/22 20:44, 216F
→
02/22 20:45, , 217F
02/22 20:45, 217F
→
02/22 20:46, , 218F
02/22 20:46, 218F
→
02/23 05:39, , 219F
02/23 05:39, 219F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
討論
50
174
完整討論串 (本文為第 9 之 9 篇):
討論
56
219
討論
50
174
討論
43
113
討論
15
50
討論
-2
23
討論
11
55
討論
156
250
討論
14
45