Re: [討論] LIN到底有什麼問題阿
首先,目前湖人戰術就是很喜歡讓長人在高位策應,
從開季以來長人高位拿球策應的次數就是明顯比Lin發動高位擋拆的多.
普你老木也好三角也好,本來就不會常讓PG長時間持球自己來,
所以出手少主要是戰術的問題.
其次,以往Lin只會持球自己來的觀點根本是他媽的屁話,
其實Lin空手跑的觀念很好,這幾場我有特別注意Lin的空手位移
很多時候Lin都有取得很好的空位,出手多寡另一個關鍵是
Lin球給出去空手跑後球有沒再回來.
上一場對戰黃蜂Lin FG8-12 3P 3-6 21分
其中三分兩球都是kobe給的(一球是半場切西瓜傳球,一球算是小炸彈)
沒這兩球Lin的數據就是下修到 FG 6-10 3P 1-4 15分
就是回到他本季目前差不多的出手均值.
所以Lin出手多少關鍵還是在教練跟團隊,現在教練又不是MDA
不可能還讓Lin打紐約林來瘋那套的.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 118.167.133.168
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1415764603.A.BBF.html
※ 編輯: watwmark (118.167.133.168), 11/12/2014 11:57:57
→
11/12 11:57, , 1F
11/12 11:57, 1F
推
11/12 11:58, , 2F
11/12 11:58, 2F
推
11/12 11:58, , 3F
11/12 11:58, 3F
推
11/12 11:58, , 4F
11/12 11:58, 4F
推
11/12 11:58, , 5F
11/12 11:58, 5F
推
11/12 11:59, , 6F
11/12 11:59, 6F
→
11/12 11:59, , 7F
11/12 11:59, 7F
推
11/12 11:59, , 8F
11/12 11:59, 8F
推
11/12 11:59, , 9F
11/12 11:59, 9F
推
11/12 11:59, , 10F
11/12 11:59, 10F
推
11/12 11:59, , 11F
11/12 11:59, 11F
→
11/12 12:00, , 12F
11/12 12:00, 12F
推
11/12 12:00, , 13F
11/12 12:00, 13F
推
11/12 12:00, , 14F
11/12 12:00, 14F
推
11/12 12:00, , 15F
11/12 12:00, 15F
→
11/12 12:00, , 16F
11/12 12:00, 16F
→
11/12 12:00, , 17F
11/12 12:00, 17F
推
11/12 12:00, , 18F
11/12 12:00, 18F
推
11/12 12:01, , 19F
11/12 12:01, 19F
→
11/12 12:01, , 20F
11/12 12:01, 20F
推
11/12 12:01, , 21F
11/12 12:01, 21F
→
11/12 12:01, , 22F
11/12 12:01, 22F
→
11/12 12:02, , 23F
11/12 12:02, 23F
推
11/12 12:02, , 24F
11/12 12:02, 24F
推
11/12 12:02, , 25F
11/12 12:02, 25F
推
11/12 12:02, , 26F
11/12 12:02, 26F
→
11/12 12:02, , 27F
11/12 12:02, 27F
→
11/12 12:03, , 28F
11/12 12:03, 28F
→
11/12 12:03, , 29F
11/12 12:03, 29F
Kobe自幹不是新聞,但事實上是,目前湖人每個人持球後進攻慾望都很高 XD
現在湖人一堆短約阿,大家都要拼明年出路的.像Hill的約也是1+1 TO
說真的你能怪人想出手嗎?
目前湖人最不自幹的其實就只有Lin和Ed,但Ed目前還是被按在板凳上 (哭哭
推
11/12 12:03, , 30F
11/12 12:03, 30F
推
11/12 12:03, , 31F
11/12 12:03, 31F
推
11/12 12:03, , 32F
11/12 12:03, 32F
※ 編輯: watwmark (118.167.133.168), 11/12/2014 12:05:30
→
11/12 12:03, , 33F
11/12 12:03, 33F
推
11/12 12:04, , 34F
11/12 12:04, 34F
推
11/12 12:04, , 35F
11/12 12:04, 35F
→
11/12 12:05, , 36F
11/12 12:05, 36F
※ 編輯: watwmark (118.167.133.168), 11/12/2014 12:06:44
還有 29 則推文
還有 2 段內文
推
11/12 12:23, , 66F
11/12 12:23, 66F
推
11/12 12:24, , 67F
11/12 12:24, 67F
→
11/12 12:24, , 68F
11/12 12:24, 68F
推
11/12 12:24, , 69F
11/12 12:24, 69F
→
11/12 12:25, , 70F
11/12 12:25, 70F
→
11/12 12:25, , 71F
11/12 12:25, 71F
推
11/12 12:26, , 72F
11/12 12:26, 72F
→
11/12 12:26, , 73F
11/12 12:26, 73F
→
11/12 12:27, , 74F
11/12 12:27, 74F
推
11/12 12:27, , 75F
11/12 12:27, 75F
→
11/12 12:28, , 76F
11/12 12:28, 76F
推
11/12 12:29, , 77F
11/12 12:29, 77F
→
11/12 12:30, , 78F
11/12 12:30, 78F
→
11/12 12:31, , 79F
11/12 12:31, 79F
推
11/12 12:32, , 80F
11/12 12:32, 80F
推
11/12 12:33, , 81F
11/12 12:33, 81F
推
11/12 12:35, , 82F
11/12 12:35, 82F
→
11/12 12:35, , 83F
11/12 12:35, 83F
→
11/12 12:36, , 84F
11/12 12:36, 84F
推
11/12 12:36, , 85F
11/12 12:36, 85F
推
11/12 12:37, , 86F
11/12 12:37, 86F
推
11/12 12:40, , 87F
11/12 12:40, 87F
推
11/12 12:40, , 88F
11/12 12:40, 88F
推
11/12 12:42, , 89F
11/12 12:42, 89F
→
11/12 12:43, , 90F
11/12 12:43, 90F
推
11/12 12:44, , 91F
11/12 12:44, 91F
→
11/12 12:44, , 92F
11/12 12:44, 92F
推
11/12 12:59, , 93F
11/12 12:59, 93F
推
11/12 13:09, , 94F
11/12 13:09, 94F
推
11/12 13:10, , 95F
11/12 13:10, 95F
推
11/12 13:26, , 96F
11/12 13:26, 96F
→
11/12 13:53, , 97F
11/12 13:53, 97F
→
11/12 13:54, , 98F
11/12 13:54, 98F
→
11/12 13:54, , 99F
11/12 13:54, 99F
推
11/12 14:12, , 100F
11/12 14:12, 100F
推
11/12 14:59, , 101F
11/12 14:59, 101F
→
11/12 15:02, , 102F
11/12 15:02, 102F
推
11/12 16:01, , 103F
11/12 16:01, 103F
推
11/12 21:52, , 104F
11/12 21:52, 104F
推
11/13 18:56, , 105F
11/13 18:56, 105F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
討論
31
224
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 7 篇):
討論
13
41
討論
31
224
討論
-20
54
討論
-9
42
討論
58
105
討論
52
177