[討論] Kobe明知道少自幹就能贏 但為何?
你知我知小曼巴也知
Kobe只要出手太多次
湖人的勝率是越慘的
這個之前就有統計出來過的
Kobe出手超過30次
湖人的勝率會往下掉
今天Kobe"只"出手了20球
湖人贏球了
這有點像賭博
明知道賭一定十賭九輸
但就是要賭
Kobe這個問題一定有人跟他反映過
但為何Kobe還是要執意投到手斷掉為止
成為歷史的打鐵王呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 60.248.163.193
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1415597137.A.F26.html
推
11/10 13:26, , 1F
11/10 13:26, 1F
噓
11/10 13:26, , 2F
11/10 13:26, 2F
→
11/10 13:26, , 3F
11/10 13:26, 3F
推
11/10 13:27, , 4F
11/10 13:27, 4F
沒計助攻真的很不合理 打板傳球比較穩
推
11/10 13:27, , 5F
11/10 13:27, 5F
噓
11/10 13:27, , 6F
11/10 13:27, 6F
→
11/10 13:27, , 7F
11/10 13:27, 7F
推
11/10 13:27, , 8F
11/10 13:27, 8F
推
11/10 13:27, , 9F
11/10 13:27, 9F
→
11/10 13:27, , 10F
11/10 13:27, 10F
推
11/10 13:27, , 11F
11/10 13:27, 11F
推
11/10 13:27, , 12F
11/10 13:27, 12F
推
11/10 13:27, , 13F
11/10 13:27, 13F
推
11/10 13:27, , 14F
11/10 13:27, 14F
推
11/10 13:27, , 15F
11/10 13:27, 15F
您說得非常有道理~ 我大概漸漸能體會到了
→
11/10 13:28, , 16F
11/10 13:28, 16F
→
11/10 13:28, , 17F
11/10 13:28, 17F
噓
11/10 13:28, , 18F
11/10 13:28, 18F
推
11/10 13:28, , 19F
11/10 13:28, 19F
推
11/10 13:29, , 20F
11/10 13:29, 20F
推
11/10 13:29, , 21F
11/10 13:29, 21F
→
11/10 13:29, , 22F
11/10 13:29, 22F
噓
11/10 13:29, , 23F
11/10 13:29, 23F
※ 編輯: c1236 (60.248.163.193), 11/10/2014 13:33:05
推
11/10 13:29, , 24F
11/10 13:29, 24F
推
11/10 13:29, , 25F
11/10 13:29, 25F
推
11/10 13:30, , 26F
11/10 13:30, 26F
→
11/10 13:30, , 27F
11/10 13:30, 27F
噓
11/10 13:30, , 28F
11/10 13:30, 28F
推
11/10 13:30, , 29F
11/10 13:30, 29F
→
11/10 13:31, , 30F
11/10 13:31, 30F
噓
11/10 13:31, , 31F
11/10 13:31, 31F
→
11/10 13:32, , 32F
11/10 13:32, 32F
→
11/10 13:33, , 33F
11/10 13:33, 33F
推
11/10 13:33, , 34F
11/10 13:33, 34F
噓
11/10 13:34, , 35F
11/10 13:34, 35F
→
11/10 13:34, , 36F
11/10 13:34, 36F
還有 21 則推文
→
11/10 13:52, , 58F
11/10 13:52, 58F
→
11/10 13:53, , 59F
11/10 13:53, 59F
→
11/10 13:54, , 60F
11/10 13:54, 60F
→
11/10 13:54, , 61F
11/10 13:54, 61F
→
11/10 13:54, , 62F
11/10 13:54, 62F
推
11/10 13:55, , 63F
11/10 13:55, 63F
→
11/10 13:55, , 64F
11/10 13:55, 64F
→
11/10 13:57, , 65F
11/10 13:57, 65F
→
11/10 13:59, , 66F
11/10 13:59, 66F
噓
11/10 14:01, , 67F
11/10 14:01, 67F
→
11/10 14:02, , 68F
11/10 14:02, 68F
→
11/10 14:03, , 69F
11/10 14:03, 69F
推
11/10 14:10, , 70F
11/10 14:10, 70F
推
11/10 14:19, , 71F
11/10 14:19, 71F
→
11/10 14:21, , 72F
11/10 14:21, 72F
→
11/10 14:21, , 73F
11/10 14:21, 73F
推
11/10 14:21, , 74F
11/10 14:21, 74F
推
11/10 14:25, , 75F
11/10 14:25, 75F
→
11/10 14:25, , 76F
11/10 14:25, 76F
→
11/10 14:27, , 77F
11/10 14:27, 77F
→
11/10 14:27, , 78F
11/10 14:27, 78F
噓
11/10 14:27, , 79F
11/10 14:27, 79F
推
11/10 14:34, , 80F
11/10 14:34, 80F
→
11/10 14:34, , 81F
11/10 14:34, 81F
推
11/10 14:34, , 82F
11/10 14:34, 82F
推
11/10 14:34, , 83F
11/10 14:34, 83F
→
11/10 14:39, , 84F
11/10 14:39, 84F
噓
11/10 14:46, , 85F
11/10 14:46, 85F
推
11/10 15:02, , 86F
11/10 15:02, 86F
→
11/10 15:09, , 87F
11/10 15:09, 87F
推
11/10 15:48, , 88F
11/10 15:48, 88F
噓
11/10 15:57, , 89F
11/10 15:57, 89F
噓
11/10 16:08, , 90F
11/10 16:08, 90F
推
11/10 16:26, , 91F
11/10 16:26, 91F
推
11/10 16:33, , 92F
11/10 16:33, 92F
噓
11/10 17:01, , 93F
11/10 17:01, 93F
推
11/10 17:01, , 94F
11/10 17:01, 94F
→
11/10 18:14, , 95F
11/10 18:14, 95F
→
11/10 22:56, , 96F
11/10 22:56, 96F
推
11/10 23:19, , 97F
11/10 23:19, 97F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):