Re: [情報] 9中0不如30中0?德隆:那是科比 控衛不會
第二次二聯霸時,我認為KOBE已經成熟許多了。更多戰術的配合,比較少的不合理出手。
事實上,湖人當時的戰術設計,就是兩座高塔,Gasol 和Bynum鞏固禁區,Gasol可以在
高位做策應,有空檔就傳,不行的話也可以自己投中距離。Bynum在籃下,具優勢的話
就給他單打,若不行再傳出來外圍重新導傳。
而外圍的三人,Artest當時屬於防守組,再加上外圍冷箭的能力。Fisher也是外圍冷箭,
論切入,其實二人都是不太行。而KOBE就是定位成球隊第一得分手,他的全地圖自走砲,
我想讓他有開火權是合理的。當大家都沒有手感時,一個人出來帶領球隊得分,這就是
球星的價值。
所以以第二次二連霸來說,我認為KOBE的出手合理多了。這也可以從命中和hot zone反
應出來
而且全盛時期的KOBE不只有進攻,他的防守也是非常令人稱道的。
說KOBE只是運氣好的Marbury,感覺就像之前某NBA球星說,任何人出手30次都可以得到40
分一樣
最好是這樣= =
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
已訂正....sorry我先承認我不是考據派,有提到的引述和數據都是看之前別人分析的..
還有我沒有想戰KOBE跟LBJ...
我覺得,KOBE他有看到MJ的得分超強這部分。他也很努力的訓練得分技巧,我認為單就
得分手段來說,他已經超過MJ了
但籃球從來不只有得分。MJ他是在學會怎麼打團隊籃球後,才真正的第一次拿到冠軍戒指
。MJ的籃板、助攻都有中上的程度。相對來說,KOBE這部分就比較薄弱了。
再來,MJ有兩個名人堂等級的幫忙。我並不是說MJ靠他們,但是相輔相成的結果,造就了
可怕的公牛盛事。想要複製MJ道路的KOBE,恐怕再怎麼努力都沒辦法達到MJ的道路。
畢竟,歷史上可真還沒有一個得分超強的得分機器可以靠一己之力拿到冠軍。
冠軍,說穿了,其實也就只是天時地利人合。但他卻是判斷偉大的大指標。
--
→
03/24 23:15,
03/24 23:15
→
03/24 23:32,
03/24 23:32
推
03/24 23:52,
03/24 23:52
推
03/24 23:56,
03/24 23:56
→
03/24 23:57,
03/24 23:57
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 203.64.84.156
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1411982187.A.FCD.html
推
09/29 17:18, , 1F
09/29 17:18, 1F
推
09/29 17:18, , 2F
09/29 17:18, 2F
→
09/29 17:22, , 3F
09/29 17:22, 3F
推
09/29 17:23, , 4F
09/29 17:23, 4F
→
09/29 17:24, , 5F
09/29 17:24, 5F
→
09/29 17:26, , 6F
09/29 17:26, 6F
噓
09/29 17:29, , 7F
09/29 17:29, 7F
噓
09/29 17:30, , 8F
09/29 17:30, 8F
推
09/29 17:31, , 9F
09/29 17:31, 9F
→
09/29 17:31, , 10F
09/29 17:31, 10F
→
09/29 17:31, , 11F
09/29 17:31, 11F
推
09/29 17:32, , 12F
09/29 17:32, 12F
推
09/29 17:33, , 13F
09/29 17:33, 13F
→
09/29 17:33, , 14F
09/29 17:33, 14F
推
09/29 17:34, , 15F
09/29 17:34, 15F
推
09/29 17:35, , 16F
09/29 17:35, 16F
→
09/29 17:35, , 17F
09/29 17:35, 17F
→
09/29 17:35, , 18F
09/29 17:35, 18F
噓
09/29 17:35, , 19F
09/29 17:35, 19F
推
09/29 17:36, , 20F
09/29 17:36, 20F
→
09/29 17:36, , 21F
09/29 17:36, 21F
→
09/29 17:36, , 22F
09/29 17:36, 22F
推
09/29 17:37, , 23F
09/29 17:37, 23F
→
09/29 17:38, , 24F
09/29 17:38, 24F
→
09/29 17:38, , 25F
09/29 17:38, 25F
推
09/29 17:39, , 26F
09/29 17:39, 26F
→
09/29 17:39, , 27F
09/29 17:39, 27F
→
09/29 17:40, , 28F
09/29 17:40, 28F
推
09/29 17:40, , 29F
09/29 17:40, 29F
→
09/29 17:40, , 30F
09/29 17:40, 30F
→
09/29 17:41, , 31F
09/29 17:41, 31F
推
09/29 17:42, , 32F
09/29 17:42, 32F
噓
09/29 17:42, , 33F
09/29 17:42, 33F
還有 80 則推文
還有 2 段內文
→
09/29 18:41, , 114F
09/29 18:41, 114F
噓
09/29 18:42, , 115F
09/29 18:42, 115F
推
09/29 18:43, , 116F
09/29 18:43, 116F
→
09/29 18:44, , 117F
09/29 18:44, 117F
→
09/29 18:44, , 118F
09/29 18:44, 118F
推
09/29 18:46, , 119F
09/29 18:46, 119F
→
09/29 18:47, , 120F
09/29 18:47, 120F
推
09/29 18:49, , 121F
09/29 18:49, 121F
推
09/29 18:49, , 122F
09/29 18:49, 122F
→
09/29 18:49, , 123F
09/29 18:49, 123F
推
09/29 18:51, , 124F
09/29 18:51, 124F
推
09/29 18:52, , 125F
09/29 18:52, 125F
→
09/29 18:53, , 126F
09/29 18:53, 126F
推
09/29 18:55, , 127F
09/29 18:55, 127F
→
09/29 18:56, , 128F
09/29 18:56, 128F
噓
09/29 19:09, , 129F
09/29 19:09, 129F
→
09/29 19:48, , 130F
09/29 19:48, 130F
噓
09/29 19:56, , 131F
09/29 19:56, 131F
→
09/29 20:02, , 132F
09/29 20:02, 132F
噓
09/29 20:02, , 133F
09/29 20:02, 133F
噓
09/29 20:32, , 134F
09/29 20:32, 134F
噓
09/29 21:39, , 135F
09/29 21:39, 135F
噓
09/29 22:57, , 136F
09/29 22:57, 136F
噓
09/29 23:24, , 137F
09/29 23:24, 137F
噓
09/29 23:30, , 138F
09/29 23:30, 138F
推
09/30 00:24, , 139F
09/30 00:24, 139F
噓
09/30 01:49, , 140F
09/30 01:49, 140F
噓
09/30 05:45, , 141F
09/30 05:45, 141F
→
09/30 05:46, , 142F
09/30 05:46, 142F
→
09/30 05:50, , 143F
09/30 05:50, 143F
噓
09/30 08:25, , 144F
09/30 08:25, 144F
→
09/30 08:26, , 145F
09/30 08:26, 145F
推
09/30 11:53, , 146F
09/30 11:53, 146F
推
09/30 11:59, , 147F
09/30 11:59, 147F
噓
09/30 12:37, , 148F
09/30 12:37, 148F
噓
09/30 21:07, , 149F
09/30 21:07, 149F
→
10/01 01:38, , 150F
10/01 01:38, 150F
→
10/01 01:38, , 151F
10/01 01:38, 151F
噓
10/02 01:50, , 152F
10/02 01:50, 152F
→
10/02 01:50, , 153F
10/02 01:50, 153F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):