Re: [專欄] 三度灌爆籃框的搞笑博士 — Shaquille O
作者: shihchinlun (stone) 看板: NBA
標題: Re: [專欄] 三度灌爆籃框的搞笑博士 — Shaquille O
時間: Fri Aug 15 17:01:08 2014
其實有件是我一直有點不解
大家幾乎都把歐肥形容成無解的內線怪獸,禁區拿到球就是2分
姑且不論甚麼領導力,統治力,防守,籃板
純論進攻就好了
歐肥的進攻....真的這麼強?
歐肥 PTS TS%
生涯平均 23.7 .586
得分最高(99-00) 29.7 .574
Kobe
生涯平均 25.5 .555
得分最高(05-06) 35.4 .559
司機
生涯平均 22.5 .582
得分最高(08-09) 25.9 .564
姚明
生涯平均 19.0 .596
得分最高(06-07) 25.0 .601
LBJ
生涯平均 27.5 .581
得分最高(07-08) 30.0 .568
KD
生涯平均 27.4 .600
得分最高(13-14) 32.0 .635
Curry
生涯平均 20.5 .592
得分最高(13-14) 23.7 .610
隨便列幾個當下想到的人沒啥特殊意思
這幾個人生無疑歐肥的射程是最短的,而且KB,LBJ,KD完全可以從頭到尾自己帶球進攻
Curry本身控衛就不用說了...
同年代的中鋒姚明其實命中率也在歐肥之上
而且LBJ,KD,Curry這三個人數據都還呈現上升趨勢,LBJ今年數據是27.1分 .649
新科MBP KD就算常常被酸圓仔,乾兒子.但人家明明國際賽還是超威的
請問有人可以解釋一下歐肥進攻這麼無解但TS%其實沒有高到哪裡去的原因嗎..
(除了罰球外)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 154.58.64.65
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1408093271.A.9A9.html
推
08/15 17:03, , 1F
08/15 17:03, 1F
→
08/15 17:03, , 2F
08/15 17:03, 2F
→
08/15 17:03, , 3F
08/15 17:03, 3F
推
08/15 17:04, , 4F
08/15 17:04, 4F
推
08/15 17:04, , 5F
08/15 17:04, 5F
推
08/15 17:04, , 6F
08/15 17:04, 6F
推
08/15 17:05, , 7F
08/15 17:05, 7F
→
08/15 17:05, , 8F
08/15 17:05, 8F
→
08/15 17:05, , 9F
08/15 17:05, 9F
→
08/15 17:06, , 10F
08/15 17:06, 10F
推
08/15 17:06, , 11F
08/15 17:06, 11F
→
08/15 17:06, , 12F
08/15 17:06, 12F
→
08/15 17:06, , 13F
08/15 17:06, 13F
→
08/15 17:07, , 14F
08/15 17:07, 14F
推
08/15 17:07, , 15F
08/15 17:07, 15F
→
08/15 17:07, , 16F
08/15 17:07, 16F
推
08/15 17:08, , 17F
08/15 17:08, 17F
→
08/15 17:08, , 18F
08/15 17:08, 18F
→
08/15 17:08, , 19F
08/15 17:08, 19F
推
08/15 17:08, , 20F
08/15 17:08, 20F
噓
08/15 17:08, , 21F
08/15 17:08, 21F
→
08/15 17:08, , 22F
08/15 17:08, 22F
→
08/15 17:09, , 23F
08/15 17:09, 23F
→
08/15 17:09, , 24F
08/15 17:09, 24F
→
08/15 17:09, , 25F
08/15 17:09, 25F
噓
08/15 17:09, , 26F
08/15 17:09, 26F
→
08/15 17:09, , 27F
08/15 17:09, 27F
→
08/15 17:10, , 28F
08/15 17:10, 28F
但是他助攻好像也沒有特別高阿,所以代表他傳球很爛or對友空檔還是投不進?
推
08/15 17:10, , 29F
08/15 17:10, 29F
噓
08/15 17:11, , 30F
08/15 17:11, 30F
推
08/15 17:11, , 31F
08/15 17:11, 31F
→
08/15 17:12, , 32F
08/15 17:12, 32F
噓
08/15 17:13, , 33F
08/15 17:13, 33F
→
08/15 17:13, , 34F
08/15 17:13, 34F
※ 編輯: shihchinlun (154.58.64.65), 08/15/2014 17:16:00
噓
08/15 17:14, , 35F
08/15 17:14, 35F
推
08/15 17:14, , 36F
08/15 17:14, 36F
噓
08/15 17:15, , 37F
08/15 17:15, 37F
還有 60 則推文
還有 4 段內文
→
08/15 19:39, , 98F
08/15 19:39, 98F
→
08/15 19:39, , 99F
08/15 19:39, 99F
推
08/15 19:46, , 100F
08/15 19:46, 100F
→
08/15 19:47, , 101F
08/15 19:47, 101F
噓
08/15 19:56, , 102F
08/15 19:56, 102F
噓
08/15 19:58, , 103F
08/15 19:58, 103F
推
08/15 20:20, , 104F
08/15 20:20, 104F
推
08/15 20:24, , 105F
08/15 20:24, 105F
→
08/15 20:25, , 106F
08/15 20:25, 106F
→
08/15 20:32, , 107F
08/15 20:32, 107F
噓
08/15 20:33, , 108F
08/15 20:33, 108F
→
08/15 20:34, , 109F
08/15 20:34, 109F
→
08/15 20:34, , 110F
08/15 20:34, 110F
噓
08/15 20:38, , 111F
08/15 20:38, 111F
噓
08/15 20:48, , 112F
08/15 20:48, 112F
→
08/15 20:59, , 113F
08/15 20:59, 113F
噓
08/15 21:41, , 114F
08/15 21:41, 114F
噓
08/15 22:12, , 115F
08/15 22:12, 115F
→
08/15 22:12, , 116F
08/15 22:12, 116F
噓
08/15 22:41, , 117F
08/15 22:41, 117F
噓
08/15 23:23, , 118F
08/15 23:23, 118F
噓
08/15 23:53, , 119F
08/15 23:53, 119F
噓
08/16 00:44, , 120F
08/16 00:44, 120F
噓
08/16 02:23, , 121F
08/16 02:23, 121F
噓
08/16 02:48, , 122F
08/16 02:48, 122F
噓
08/16 02:49, , 123F
08/16 02:49, 123F
噓
08/16 03:56, , 124F
08/16 03:56, 124F
噓
08/16 04:52, , 125F
08/16 04:52, 125F
噓
08/16 06:15, , 126F
08/16 06:15, 126F
推
08/16 06:52, , 127F
08/16 06:52, 127F
推
08/16 15:02, , 128F
08/16 15:02, 128F
→
08/16 15:02, , 129F
08/16 15:02, 129F
→
08/16 15:04, , 130F
08/16 15:04, 130F
→
08/16 15:05, , 131F
08/16 15:05, 131F
噓
08/16 16:15, , 132F
08/16 16:15, 132F
噓
08/16 18:33, , 133F
08/16 18:33, 133F
噓
08/17 02:54, , 134F
08/17 02:54, 134F
→
08/17 11:33, , 135F
08/17 11:33, 135F
→
08/17 11:34, , 136F
08/17 11:34, 136F
→
08/17 11:34, , 137F
08/17 11:34, 137F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 5 篇):