[討論] 書豪適合去或是有可能去哪隊?
甜瓜的事件鬧得沸沸揚揚
Morey也表示要把書豪送走了
但書豪不是自由球員
火箭想送,別隊也不一定想收
即使是要像他的好兄弟Asik一樣賤賣
書豪的賣相也不如Asik
先前有rumor說勇士可能用TE來換書豪
但這項傳言在勇士簽下Livingston之後應該等同不可能
Livingston在籃網打的就像雙能衛
能傳球助攻也能自行創造機會得分
整體功能跟書豪有所重疊
像Asik到鵜鶘就被認為會有所解放
鵜鶘在Robin Lopez離開後就缺少一個合格的主戰中鋒
Asik的苦工跟籃板將能讓AD專注在四號位進攻上
打開各隊目前陣容來看
後場戰力比較欠缺的應該屬七六人、魔術等隊
但這些球隊也有各自的新秀要養
大家覺得書豪較有可能落腳何處呢?
哪裡又比較有機會讓他發揮?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 218.161.12.249
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1404398622.A.775.html
→
07/03 22:45, , 1F
07/03 22:45, 1F
推
07/03 22:45, , 2F
07/03 22:45, 2F
→
07/03 22:45, , 3F
07/03 22:45, 3F
推
07/03 22:46, , 4F
07/03 22:46, 4F
推
07/03 22:46, , 5F
07/03 22:46, 5F
→
07/03 22:47, , 6F
07/03 22:47, 6F
推
07/03 22:47, , 7F
07/03 22:47, 7F
推
07/03 22:47, , 8F
07/03 22:47, 8F
推
07/03 22:49, , 9F
07/03 22:49, 9F
推
07/03 22:50, , 10F
07/03 22:50, 10F
推
07/03 22:51, , 11F
07/03 22:51, 11F
推
07/03 22:51, , 12F
07/03 22:51, 12F
推
07/03 22:52, , 13F
07/03 22:52, 13F
→
07/03 22:52, , 14F
07/03 22:52, 14F
推
07/03 22:53, , 15F
07/03 22:53, 15F
推
07/03 22:55, , 16F
07/03 22:55, 16F
→
07/03 22:55, , 17F
07/03 22:55, 17F
推
07/03 22:57, , 18F
07/03 22:57, 18F
→
07/03 22:59, , 19F
07/03 22:59, 19F
→
07/03 22:59, , 20F
07/03 22:59, 20F
→
07/03 23:04, , 21F
07/03 23:04, 21F
推
07/03 23:08, , 22F
07/03 23:08, 22F
推
07/03 23:09, , 23F
07/03 23:09, 23F
推
07/03 23:11, , 24F
07/03 23:11, 24F
→
07/03 23:14, , 25F
07/03 23:14, 25F
→
07/03 23:14, , 26F
07/03 23:14, 26F
推
07/03 23:15, , 27F
07/03 23:15, 27F
推
07/03 23:15, , 28F
07/03 23:15, 28F
推
07/03 23:18, , 29F
07/03 23:18, 29F
推
07/03 23:18, , 30F
07/03 23:18, 30F
推
07/03 23:25, , 31F
07/03 23:25, 31F
推
07/03 23:35, , 32F
07/03 23:35, 32F
馬刺的團隊系統確實滿適合,但他們可能吃不下這麼大的薪資
湖人位在華人較多的加州,到那邊的環境或許會比較友善?
※ 編輯: bill820827 (218.161.12.249), 07/03/2014 23:39:10
→
07/03 23:53, , 33F
07/03 23:53, 33F
推
07/03 23:56, , 34F
07/03 23:56, 34F
推
07/04 00:05, , 35F
07/04 00:05, 35F
→
07/04 00:05, , 36F
07/04 00:05, 36F
推
07/04 00:06, , 37F
07/04 00:06, 37F
推
07/04 00:11, , 38F
07/04 00:11, 38F
→
07/04 00:16, , 39F
07/04 00:16, 39F
推
07/04 00:16, , 40F
07/04 00:16, 40F
推
07/04 00:17, , 41F
07/04 00:17, 41F
推
07/04 00:18, , 42F
07/04 00:18, 42F
推
07/04 00:34, , 43F
07/04 00:34, 43F
→
07/04 00:42, , 44F
07/04 00:42, 44F
推
07/04 00:51, , 45F
07/04 00:51, 45F
→
07/04 00:51, , 46F
07/04 00:51, 46F
推
07/04 01:02, , 47F
07/04 01:02, 47F
→
07/04 01:02, , 48F
07/04 01:02, 48F
→
07/04 01:03, , 49F
07/04 01:03, 49F
→
07/04 01:04, , 50F
07/04 01:04, 50F
推
07/04 01:10, , 51F
07/04 01:10, 51F
推
07/04 01:42, , 52F
07/04 01:42, 52F
→
07/04 01:43, , 53F
07/04 01:43, 53F
推
07/04 01:44, , 54F
07/04 01:44, 54F
推
07/04 02:49, , 55F
07/04 02:49, 55F
→
07/04 02:49, , 56F
07/04 02:49, 56F
推
07/04 05:51, , 57F
07/04 05:51, 57F
推
07/04 09:43, , 58F
07/04 09:43, 58F
推
07/04 12:47, , 59F
07/04 12:47, 59F