[外絮] G4 POPO 賽後記者會

看板NBA作者 (E N O U G H is enough)時間10年前 (2014/05/28 15:42), 10年前編輯推噓34(38推 4噓 20→)
留言62則, 48人參與, 最新討論串1/1
嗯嗯，看得出他真的很不爽阿！ http://www.nba.com/spurs/video/2014/05/27/140527duncanmov-3284666 以下是重點節錄 Q: On the miscommunication with Duncan. ( 你跟石佛爭執甚麼？) P: I don't know what you're talking about. ( 我不知道你在說甚麼。) I don't have any idea what you are talking about. ( 我完全不知道你在說甚麼。[青筋...]) Q: Did you consider bringing back the starters? ( 為何不試著讓先發群再上陣？) P: No, because I didn't see any sense in it. ( 不，我不覺得那有任何意義！) Q: Why staters going to the bench early? ( 為何先發這麼快就下板凳區？) P: Thursday. ( 因為星期四 [要多休息] ) Q: How did the good start get away from you? ( 一開賽打得很好但後來怎麼了?) P: We didn't play smart on a consistent basis. All of a sudden we wanted to see if Serge [Ibaka] could block a shot. I thought about passing a picture out on the bench so they'd know who Serge was. Really unwise basketball all of a sudden. Instead of hitting open people that are out there, we started attacking the rim unwisely. That turns into blocked shots, we had seven turnovers in the first half, but it was really 14 because of the seven blocks. Those are all like turnovers, so that precipitated the 20 to nothing fast break points. You have to play smarter against such great athletes, they're talented obviously, but the athleticism and the length give them a small margin of error and you better be smart in the way you play. You can't afford to screw that up as many times as we did. And I think we have to play harder. I think they're playing more physically than we are, they're getting more 50/50 balls. They played with more determination than we did in these two games. ( 我們沒有聰明地打好一場球，忽然之間， 我們都心存僥倖想看看18卡會不會打到火鍋， 我真的很想在板凳席把18卡的照片傳給他們看， 這樣他們才知道18卡是哪一個！ 真的忽然之間我們變得不會打聰明的球！ 我們不多傳導到空檔再出手，反而用很笨的方式攻擊籃框，然後就被蓋火鍋.... 雖然我們上半場只有7次失誤，但加上7個火鍋，實際上就是有14個！ 本來可以多拿20分的，但這樣一來就甚麼都沒了。 對抗那些這麼棒的球員你必須要打得更聰明些， 雖然馬刺球員都很有天分， 但比賽的強度跟長度不允許他們犯太多的錯誤！ 我們螺絲真的要拴緊一點、打得更努力一點。 我認為雷霆打的比我們更硬、更多有一半機率可以進的球。 這兩場比賽他們打的比我們更為堅決) Q: On Westbrook and Durant defensively ( WB跟KD防守的怎麼樣? ) P: I thought they did a good job. They're great players. That's what they do. ( 恩，他們做得很棒，他們都是偉大的球員。) Q: Pressed on why Westbrook was effective (為什麼今天WB這麼猛？) P: You'd have to ask him why. (你應該去問他吧！[青筋...]) Q: Jeremy Lamb and adjustements (接下來如何針對小羊做調整？) P: This has nothing to do with adjustments, it's about playing smarter and harder for more consistent minutes. (沒啥好調整的，只要我們打得更聰明更努力就好) 心得：POPO的笑總是讓人發寒阿！ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 59.115.133.80 ※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1401262961.A.68B.html
→
05/28 15:45, , 1F
必須服了 這場從頭被壓到尾
05/28 15:45, 1F
推
05/28 15:45, , 2F
他火大是因為記者嘴巴含著食物在問問題
05/28 15:45, 2F
推
05/28 15:45, , 3F
感謝翻譯
05/28 15:45, 3F
推
05/28 15:46, , 4F
波波真性情啊!
05/28 15:46, 4F
推
05/28 15:46, , 5F
輸球不牽拖...真的很值得讓大家學習.....哀
05/28 15:46, 5F
推
05/28 15:47, , 6F
黑要讓他們黑 噴還會被罰錢 不抓狂真的很難吧..
05/28 15:47, 6F
推
05/28 15:47, , 7F
他火大都是因為記者拿著18卡的照片在問問題
05/28 15:47, 7F
推
05/28 15:47, , 8F
咦？沒開玩笑了嗎？
05/28 15:47, 8F
推
05/28 15:48, , 9F
對啊不像某隊從總教練到球員只會BBBB
05/28 15:48, 9F
→
05/28 15:48, , 10F
看來這場讓POPO不爽到連玩笑都不開了
05/28 15:48, 10F
推
05/28 15:48, , 11F
波波講那麼多，反觀鄉民只對哨聲有反應
05/28 15:48, 11F
→
05/28 15:48, , 12F
他應該想想如何領先30分 不然馬刺會被魔音穿腦而亡
05/28 15:48, 12F
推
05/28 15:49, , 13F
要讓Pop開玩笑其實要自己鋪梗
05/28 15:49, 13F
推
05/28 15:49, , 14F
還沒領先到20分就開始吃BB了 怎麼打的下去阿
05/28 15:49, 14F
推
05/28 15:50, , 15F
暗示 : 聽好，下場給我贏40分!
05/28 15:50, 15F
推
05/28 15:51, , 16F
POP針對一個問題居然講這麼多 感覺真的很不爽
05/28 15:51, 16F
推
05/28 15:52, , 17F
Thursday. XDDDDDDDDDD
05/28 15:52, 17F
→
05/28 15:55, , 18F
波波講話真嗆辣
05/28 15:55, 18F
推
05/28 15:56, , 19F
感謝翻譯
05/28 15:56, 19F
推
05/28 15:56, , 20F
有看有推
05/28 15:56, 20F
推
05/28 15:57, , 21F
傳照片XD
05/28 15:57, 21F
推
05/28 15:58, , 22F
心裡應該很想罵 怕說了被罰錢
05/28 15:58, 22F
推
05/28 15:59, , 23F
...
05/28 15:59, 23F
推
05/28 16:03, , 24F
是否應為這些失誤（+火鍋）導致20比0的快攻分數
05/28 16:03, 24F
→
05/28 16:03, , 25F
第一題好像也沒火大，單純是Popo說記者有食物在口中
05/28 16:03, 25F
→
05/28 16:04, , 26F
Popo說他無法清楚瞭解記者在說什麼
05/28 16:04, 26F
推
05/28 16:07, , 27F
POPO已經默認BBBBBBB 何需多言呢
05/28 16:07, 27F
→
05/28 16:07, , 28F
記者提問時口中還吃東西時再也是有夠OOXX
05/28 16:07, 28F
推
05/28 16:15, , 29F
超級喜歡POPO阿
05/28 16:15, 29F
推
05/28 16:17, , 30F
拿18卡照片看超好笑,跟TD之前回答18K是哪位有呼應XD
05/28 16:17, 30F
推
05/28 16:17, , 31F
所以雷霆中心是一八卡才對
05/28 16:17, 31F
推
05/28 16:18, , 32F
借轉不爽到放大絕吃T版
05/28 16:18, 32F
※ keroromoa:轉錄至看板 Spurs 05/28 16:18
推
05/28 16:19, , 33F
用心推，不過長問題的Q是在問為何開賽打得好卻無法持
05/28 16:19, 33F
→
05/28 16:19, , 34F
續..回答中間那裡是說失誤+火鍋造成20:0的快攻差別
05/28 16:19, 34F
→
05/28 16:20, , 35F
天份是在講雷霆球員，所以馬刺犯錯空間很小，要聰明
05/28 16:20, 35F
推
05/28 16:24, , 36F
吃東西的是OKC的記者XDDDDDDDDDDDDD
05/28 16:24, 36F
推
05/28 16:27, , 37F
實在 推
05/28 16:27, 37F
→
05/28 16:29, , 38F
阿對 長問題應該試問開散跟之後的差別而不是先發
05/28 16:29, 38F
※ 編輯: kairiyu (59.115.133.80), 05/28/2014 16:30:14
推
05/28 16:32, , 39F
直接衝擊籃框，兩隊結果不同 哀
05/28 16:32, 39F
→
05/28 16:32, , 40F
可憐馬刺只能被迫打這種大空檔才能投的球
05/28 16:32, 40F
→
05/28 16:32, , 41F
大空檔三分還有可能被黑掉 ZZZZ偉哉雷霆
05/28 16:32, 41F
推
05/28 16:45, , 42F
推popo
05/28 16:45, 42F
→
05/28 17:04, , 43F
青筋
05/28 17:04, 43F
噓
05/28 17:10, , 44F
唉 反觀黑雷教練輸了就討哨音。唉....差距哦
05/28 17:10, 44F
推
05/28 17:27, , 45F
Thursday
05/28 17:27, 45F
推
05/28 17:55, , 46F
我只看上半場就出門 不過OKC開始追分後 馬刺真的變不
05/28 17:55, 46F
→
05/28 17:55, , 47F
太會打球 太多單打沒有多傳幾球 跟OKC這樣打一定輸的
05/28 17:55, 47F
→
05/28 17:56, , 48F
而且防守完全壓制不了KD跟WB
05/28 17:56, 48F
推
05/28 18:02, , 49F
被聯盟整波波一定很想叫二軍上去打、甚至罷賽
05/28 18:02, 49F
→
05/28 18:15, , 50F
有啥球隊就有啥妓者 不意外.....偉哉sucking OKC
05/28 18:15, 50F
推
05/28 18:43, , 51F
反觀哨子隊輸球只會怪哨音不友善 氣度高下立判 還有
05/28 18:43, 51F
→
05/28 18:43, , 52F
那哨音得利的嘴臉 噁心透了
05/28 18:43, 52F
噓
05/28 18:46, , 53F
Duncan:罰球是雷霆的生命線 輸球就怪哨音之表率
05/28 18:46, 53F
推
05/28 19:17, , 54F
超怒
05/28 19:17, 54F
推
05/28 19:17, , 55F
反觀鄉民只會糾結哨音
05/28 19:17, 55F
噓
05/28 19:18, , 56F
他只說罰球是生命線 可沒說是哨音 搞不好TD覺得他們
05/28 19:18, 56F
→
05/28 19:18, , 57F
真的打的很有威脅吧 有人太敏感囉
05/28 19:18, 57F
→
05/28 19:19, , 58F
不過雷霆靠哨音得以在快艇那關續命 哨音也真的算是生
05/28 19:19, 58F
→
05/28 19:20, , 59F
命線了 也為之黑黑的表率了 跟國防部並駕齊驅XD
05/28 19:20, 59F
噓
05/28 20:02, , 60F
還有人護航的下去哦 唉。 國防布嗎唉....
05/28 20:02, 60F
推
05/28 21:37, , 61F
噴裁判會被罰錢 Popo又不是傻了
05/28 21:37, 61F
推
05/29 05:23, , 62F
啊G4自己打的爛啊…扯一堆裁判 會進步？會贏球？
05/29 05:23, 62F
‣ 更多 kairiyu 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1JXPDnQB (NBA)