[外絮] 國外專家們對於13-14年新秀隊的評論
2014 NBA All-Rookie Team: Complete Results for 1st and 2nd Teams
原文網址:http://ppt.cc/uoqQ
Michael Carter-Williams, Victor Oladipo and Trey Burke were among the
first-year stars who earned spots on the NBA All-Rookie teams for the 2013-14
season, which the league announced Thursday.
在5/22 NBA官方發布的新秀隊名單內,MCW、Oladipo、Burke這些大一新星毫無懸念的
被選進了第一隊的陣容。
Carter-Williams of the Philadelphia 76ers, who already won the Rookie of the
Year award, led all rookies with 125 first-team votes. Victor Oladipo of the
Orlando Magic was a close second with 124 first-team votes for a total of 248
points.
其中,年度新人獎得主MCW拿下了125張第一隊的選票、SpongeBob(海綿寶寶)則是以124張
選票緊跟其後。
Burke (Utah Jazz), Mason Plumlee (Brooklyn Nets) and Tim Hardaway Jr. (New
York Knicks) rounded out the first team. All three received more than 200
points in the voting. No other player received more than 120, which made for
a clear-cut first unit.
爵士隊的Burke、籃網的Plumlee、尼克的Hardaway也都以總分至少在200以上的狀況下
入選了第一隊,且這五人幾乎壟斷了所有第一隊的選票。
Kelly Olynyk (Boston Celtics) and Giannis Antetokounmpo (Milwaukee Bucks)
were the leading vote-getters among those on the second team. Gorgui Dieng
(Minnesota Timberwolves), Cody Zeller (Charlotte Hornets) and Steven Adams
(Oklahoma City Thunder) joined them.
長髮美男Kelly Olynyk、名字超難念的Antetokounmpo、灰狼的Dieug、山貓(黃蜂)的
Cody Zeller、與名單中球隊唯一闖進到分區決賽的Adams,這些人可能是近十年來較弱
的新秀第一第二隊了。
Ben McLemore (Sacramento Kings) and Pero Antic (Atlanta Hawks) narrowly
missed the cut.
長得像LBJ的國王新秀McLemore和超強老八老鷹隊的Antic則以毫釐之差成為遺珠。
Jason Wolf of USA Today passed along comments from the talented point guard
after he won Rookie of the Year, and his thoughts about the latest honor
would probably be similar:
"This award is great. It's greatly appreciated. But you know I'd definitely
trade this award in a second to be in the playoffs. ... This game is about
winning. It's not about individual awards."
今日美國的記者提到了關於這位賽季17-6-6的天生好手MCW拿下最佳新人:
"對於今年的NBA來說,MCW拿下這個獎簡直實至名歸,但是呢,我總覺得新人獎並不只
是一座個人獎項,帶領球隊贏球才是拿下這些獎項的最佳資本,所以我很可能會把獎
頒給打入季後賽的這位新秀..." (MCW:這樣才拿探花真是虧)
Plumlee was perhaps the most under-appreciated rookie. He played limited
minutes for a veteran-laden Nets squad but still managed to lead all rookies
in Player Efficiency Rating by a substantial margin, according to ESPN.
Plumlee可能是這個球季最被低估的新秀了,然而身在一堆沙場老將的籃網隊上,並在
有限的上場時間裡,他依然能打出新秀中最高的球員效率(PER),場均18.2分鐘裡有著
7.4分4.4板0.8鍋並且帶著6成5的命中率。
Nate Wolters of the Bucks was probably the biggest snub of the group. He only
received 20 points in the voting. Nathan Giese of HoopsHabit.com thought he
deserved the nod over Zeller:
"Might be a bit of bias here but Cody Zeller made the All-Rookie second team
but Nate Wolters didn’t. That’s a crock."
有趣的是,公鹿隊的新秀控衛Nate Wolters以20分的得票整個被無視,惹火了HoopsHabit
的專欄作家Nathan Giese:
"雖然哥是有點偏心,但Cody Zeller拿第二隊Nate吃空氣,這神馬阿!"
Looking ahead, this rookie crop won't go down as one of the best in league
history, especially with the lack of success from top pick Anthony Bennett.
That said, there were a couple gems, led by Carter-Williams, that have very
bright futures.
著眼未來,雖說今年新秀隊確實在NBA歷屆裡大概是數一數二的爛,這帳當然也要算在
謎之狀元Bennett頭上一筆;然而在整鍋老鼠屎裡面至少我們還能挑出像MCW這樣有著璀璨
未來的明日之星。
The biggest key now is seeing which players are able to take a big step
forward in their second seasons. Plumlee is a good bet assuming he sees more
playing time, and it's hard to imagine Bennett not showing some signs of
improvement after a rookie year to forget.
對於這些提早放假的新生來說,現階段的功課就是準備好能在進入NBA的第二年有著相當
突破性的進展;其中,Plumlee可能是一個球隊能將更多的時間空間押注在他身上的一位
球員,而實在很難想像,這位經歷一個難堪球季後的狀元郎,他還能有天花板嗎?
--
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.40.80.242
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1400860859.A.87B.html
※ 編輯: noone704 (114.40.80.242), 05/24/2014 00:03:59
推
05/24 00:06, , 1F
05/24 00:06, 1F
噓
05/24 00:07, , 2F
05/24 00:07, 2F
→
05/24 00:08, , 3F
05/24 00:08, 3F
→
05/24 00:10, , 4F
05/24 00:10, 4F
推
05/24 00:10, , 5F
05/24 00:10, 5F
→
05/24 00:10, , 6F
05/24 00:10, 6F
推
05/24 00:15, , 7F
05/24 00:15, 7F
推
05/24 00:16, , 8F
05/24 00:16, 8F
→
05/24 00:21, , 9F
05/24 00:21, 9F
→
05/24 00:22, , 10F
05/24 00:22, 10F
推
05/24 00:26, , 11F
05/24 00:26, 11F
推
05/24 00:29, , 12F
05/24 00:29, 12F
推
05/24 00:39, , 13F
05/24 00:39, 13F
推
05/24 00:43, , 14F
05/24 00:43, 14F
→
05/24 00:45, , 15F
05/24 00:45, 15F
推
05/24 00:50, , 16F
05/24 00:50, 16F
→
05/24 00:50, , 17F
05/24 00:50, 17F
→
05/24 00:50, , 18F
05/24 00:50, 18F
推
05/24 00:51, , 19F
05/24 00:51, 19F
推
05/24 00:53, , 20F
05/24 00:53, 20F
→
05/24 00:57, , 21F
05/24 00:57, 21F
推
05/24 01:16, , 22F
05/24 01:16, 22F
推
05/24 01:17, , 23F
05/24 01:17, 23F
推
05/24 01:25, , 24F
05/24 01:25, 24F
→
05/24 01:25, , 25F
05/24 01:25, 25F
推
05/24 01:33, , 26F
05/24 01:33, 26F
推
05/24 01:33, , 27F
05/24 01:33, 27F
噓
05/24 03:54, , 28F
05/24 03:54, 28F
推
05/24 11:26, , 29F
05/24 11:26, 29F
推
05/24 11:36, , 30F
05/24 11:36, 30F
推
05/24 12:53, , 31F
05/24 12:53, 31F
推
05/24 15:38, , 32F
05/24 15:38, 32F
推
05/24 16:14, , 33F
05/24 16:14, 33F