[討論]為什麼哈登的球風能幫助火箭隊賣票?
之前看新聞有提到莫雷或火箭隊的老闆認為哈登的球風,
可以幫助火箭隊賣票 ?
但是小弟看馬刺打拓荒者這幾場下來,
搞不懂馬刺隊的球風,會不適合賣票嗎?
1.哈登的比賽一直逼逼逼,比賽一直中斷,這樣的球風好看嗎?
2.球迷會喜歡買票去看一直輸球,或一直被逆轉的隊伍嗎?
3.就算球風不是英雄風格,起碼贏球晉級第二輪,
球場的票不就可以多賣四場?
再怎樣的球風,如果不能贏球,如果不能多贏幾場,你在季後賽能賣多少票?
火箭隊如果原本有進第三輪的天份,結果卻只一輪遊,
老闆損失了七,八場的主場賣票收入,是多少$$?? 教練都不用負責嗎?
另外,請問美國球迷真的很喜歡哈登嗎?
如果哈登球迷多的話, 為什麼哈登沒有代言球鞋,反而是Lin有??
馬刺的球風應該只是受限於市場小,
火箭隊如果打馬刺隊的球風,沒道理會賣不好票啊?
還是哈登能幫忙賣票那句話,只是自我安慰的官話?
不想承認自己花大錢簽來的巨投是水貨,是沉沒資本?
--
曾經有一位優秀的後衛擺在我眼前,我沒有去珍惜,
等到失去了才後悔莫及,塵世間最痛苦的事莫過於此,
如果上天能給我一個再來一次的機會,
我希望能對那個後衛說我簽你,
如果非要給這合約加一個期限的話,我希望是三年。
By Darius Morey
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 119.14.179.187
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1399780550.A.D01.html
噓
05/11 11:56, , 1F
05/11 11:56, 1F
推
05/11 11:56, , 2F
05/11 11:56, 2F
推
05/11 11:57, , 3F
05/11 11:57, 3F
推
05/11 11:57, , 4F
05/11 11:57, 4F
→
05/11 11:57, , 5F
05/11 11:57, 5F
→
05/11 11:57, , 6F
05/11 11:57, 6F
推
05/11 11:58, , 7F
05/11 11:58, 7F
→
05/11 11:59, , 8F
05/11 11:59, 8F
噓
05/11 11:59, , 9F
05/11 11:59, 9F
推
05/11 11:59, , 10F
05/11 11:59, 10F
噓
05/11 11:59, , 11F
05/11 11:59, 11F
推
05/11 12:00, , 12F
05/11 12:00, 12F
推
05/11 12:00, , 13F
05/11 12:00, 13F
→
05/11 12:00, , 14F
05/11 12:00, 14F
推
05/11 12:01, , 15F
05/11 12:01, 15F
→
05/11 12:01, , 16F
05/11 12:01, 16F
推
05/11 12:02, , 17F
05/11 12:02, 17F
→
05/11 12:02, , 18F
05/11 12:02, 18F
推
05/11 12:02, , 19F
05/11 12:02, 19F
→
05/11 12:02, , 20F
05/11 12:02, 20F
推
05/11 12:03, , 21F
05/11 12:03, 21F
推
05/11 12:05, , 22F
05/11 12:05, 22F
推
05/11 12:06, , 23F
05/11 12:06, 23F
推
05/11 12:10, , 24F
05/11 12:10, 24F
推
05/11 12:11, , 25F
05/11 12:11, 25F
→
05/11 12:11, , 26F
05/11 12:11, 26F
推
05/11 12:14, , 27F
05/11 12:14, 27F
推
05/11 12:19, , 28F
05/11 12:19, 28F
推
05/11 12:20, , 29F
05/11 12:20, 29F
推
05/11 12:21, , 30F
05/11 12:21, 30F
推
05/11 12:24, , 31F
05/11 12:24, 31F
推
05/11 12:28, , 32F
05/11 12:28, 32F
推
05/11 12:28, , 33F
05/11 12:28, 33F
推
05/11 12:31, , 34F
05/11 12:31, 34F
推
05/11 12:33, , 35F
05/11 12:33, 35F
推
05/11 12:35, , 36F
05/11 12:35, 36F
噓
05/11 12:39, , 37F
05/11 12:39, 37F
推
05/11 12:39, , 38F
05/11 12:39, 38F
→
05/11 12:39, , 39F
05/11 12:39, 39F
推
05/11 12:41, , 40F
05/11 12:41, 40F
推
05/11 12:46, , 41F
05/11 12:46, 41F
→
05/11 12:48, , 42F
05/11 12:48, 42F
→
05/11 12:48, , 43F
05/11 12:48, 43F
推
05/11 12:48, , 44F
05/11 12:48, 44F
→
05/11 12:51, , 45F
05/11 12:51, 45F
推
05/11 12:51, , 46F
05/11 12:51, 46F
推
05/11 12:52, , 47F
05/11 12:52, 47F
→
05/11 12:52, , 48F
05/11 12:52, 48F
→
05/11 12:52, , 49F
05/11 12:52, 49F
→
05/11 12:52, , 50F
05/11 12:52, 50F
推
05/11 12:55, , 51F
05/11 12:55, 51F
推
05/11 13:00, , 52F
05/11 13:00, 52F
→
05/11 13:10, , 53F
05/11 13:10, 53F
→
05/11 13:15, , 54F
05/11 13:15, 54F
→
05/11 13:22, , 55F
05/11 13:22, 55F
→
05/11 13:23, , 56F
05/11 13:23, 56F
推
05/11 13:23, , 57F
05/11 13:23, 57F
噓
05/11 13:23, , 58F
05/11 13:23, 58F
推
05/11 13:25, , 59F
05/11 13:25, 59F
推
05/11 13:30, , 60F
05/11 13:30, 60F
噓
05/11 13:47, , 61F
05/11 13:47, 61F
推
05/11 14:51, , 62F
05/11 14:51, 62F
→
05/11 14:51, , 63F
05/11 14:51, 63F
推
05/11 15:06, , 64F
05/11 15:06, 64F
→
05/11 15:07, , 65F
05/11 15:07, 65F
推
05/11 15:08, , 66F
05/11 15:08, 66F
→
05/11 15:11, , 67F
05/11 15:11, 67F
推
05/11 15:40, , 68F
05/11 15:40, 68F
→
05/11 16:07, , 69F
05/11 16:07, 69F
推
05/11 17:48, , 70F
05/11 17:48, 70F
推
05/11 18:50, , 71F
05/11 18:50, 71F
推
05/11 18:50, , 72F
05/11 18:50, 72F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 6 篇):