Re: [討論] 拳王是不是沒有充份發揮他的天份?已回收
※ 引述《fjack (fjack)》之銘言:
:
: 我從林來瘋時期就關注拳王了,這幾年對他愈來愈失望
: 有著頂級七尺中鋒身材,彈性,體能不錯,頓位也夠
: 但是拳王在場上,只剩搶籃板跟防守,進攻除了接pick&roll,空中補籃
: ,其它卻都不做了..
: 尼克戰績這麼差,也沒聽拳王跳出來,感覺他的心態跟公務員一樣了..
: 我相信拳王的低位技術是有的,但卻沒看他用過,對比腳廢掉的拜能,
: 拜能上場,就是低位卡住,接到球後硬擠硬打,跟一代天霸王歐尼爾
: 相同打法, 充滿霸氣... 現在快艇的葛瑞芬也是同樣充滿霸氣!
: 反而拳王有更好天份,卻不這樣打,我覺得是不是打球不夠儘力?
: 明明可以成為第一C, 卻都只出八成力氣在打球..
: 尼克隊該是拳王的球隊而不是安東尼的球隊的..
: 不知道大家對這樣的拳王有何看法?
關於這個~在他還在公牛隊時~hoop還是XXL忘了~
有篇關於他的文章~他的體能條件很好~潛力很高~這些都有說到~
單就體能而言~他有辦法達到KG的高度~但實際表現不止事與願違~
而且完全跟KG這種全能的樣態扯不上邊~僅是功能性球員~為什麼?
他們歸結出一個結論~頗傷人~就是~
籃球智商不夠......
--
庵是.....
你是山東人?
不~是閃~東人~
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 27.245.52.235
→
03/18 23:37, , 1F
03/18 23:37, 1F
推
03/18 23:39, , 2F
03/18 23:39, 2F
→
03/18 23:39, , 3F
03/18 23:39, 3F
→
03/18 23:40, , 4F
03/18 23:40, 4F
推
03/18 23:40, , 5F
03/18 23:40, 5F
→
03/18 23:42, , 6F
03/18 23:42, 6F
推
03/18 23:44, , 7F
03/18 23:44, 7F
→
03/18 23:44, , 8F
03/18 23:44, 8F
→
03/18 23:44, , 9F
03/18 23:44, 9F
推
03/18 23:46, , 10F
03/18 23:46, 10F
推
03/18 23:52, , 11F
03/18 23:52, 11F
推
03/18 23:54, , 12F
03/18 23:54, 12F
推
03/18 23:57, , 13F
03/18 23:57, 13F
推
03/18 23:59, , 14F
03/18 23:59, 14F
推
03/19 00:00, , 15F
03/19 00:00, 15F
推
03/19 00:00, , 16F
03/19 00:00, 16F
推
03/19 00:01, , 17F
03/19 00:01, 17F
推
03/19 00:02, , 18F
03/19 00:02, 18F
推
03/19 00:03, , 19F
03/19 00:03, 19F
推
03/19 00:04, , 20F
03/19 00:04, 20F
推
03/19 00:07, , 21F
03/19 00:07, 21F
推
03/19 00:07, , 22F
03/19 00:07, 22F
→
03/19 00:07, , 23F
03/19 00:07, 23F
→
03/19 00:08, , 24F
03/19 00:08, 24F
→
03/19 00:08, , 25F
03/19 00:08, 25F
→
03/19 00:08, , 26F
03/19 00:08, 26F
→
03/19 00:08, , 27F
03/19 00:08, 27F
→
03/19 00:09, , 28F
03/19 00:09, 28F
→
03/19 00:10, , 29F
03/19 00:10, 29F
推
03/19 00:10, , 30F
03/19 00:10, 30F
→
03/19 00:11, , 31F
03/19 00:11, 31F
推
03/19 00:12, , 32F
03/19 00:12, 32F
推
03/19 00:14, , 33F
03/19 00:14, 33F
推
03/19 00:18, , 34F
03/19 00:18, 34F
推
03/19 00:22, , 35F
03/19 00:22, 35F
推
03/19 00:23, , 36F
03/19 00:23, 36F
推
03/19 00:29, , 37F
03/19 00:29, 37F
推
03/19 00:29, , 38F
03/19 00:29, 38F
→
03/19 00:30, , 39F
03/19 00:30, 39F
→
03/19 00:31, , 40F
03/19 00:31, 40F
推
03/19 00:33, , 41F
03/19 00:33, 41F
推
03/19 00:43, , 42F
03/19 00:43, 42F
→
03/19 00:44, , 43F
03/19 00:44, 43F
推
03/19 00:52, , 44F
03/19 00:52, 44F
→
03/19 00:53, , 45F
03/19 00:53, 45F
推
03/19 01:02, , 46F
03/19 01:02, 46F
推
03/19 01:29, , 47F
03/19 01:29, 47F
推
03/19 01:32, , 48F
03/19 01:32, 48F
推
03/19 01:35, , 49F
03/19 01:35, 49F
→
03/19 01:35, , 50F
03/19 01:35, 50F
→
03/19 01:36, , 51F
03/19 01:36, 51F
推
03/19 01:36, , 52F
03/19 01:36, 52F
→
03/19 01:36, , 53F
03/19 01:36, 53F
推
03/19 02:14, , 54F
03/19 02:14, 54F
→
03/19 02:50, , 55F
03/19 02:50, 55F
噓
03/19 03:26, , 56F
03/19 03:26, 56F
→
03/19 03:51, , 57F
03/19 03:51, 57F
→
03/19 07:57, , 58F
03/19 07:57, 58F
推
03/19 09:09, , 59F
03/19 09:09, 59F
推
03/19 09:18, , 60F
03/19 09:18, 60F
→
03/19 09:29, , 61F
03/19 09:29, 61F
推
03/19 09:38, , 62F
03/19 09:38, 62F
→
03/19 09:38, , 63F
03/19 09:38, 63F
推
03/19 12:28, , 64F
03/19 12:28, 64F
推
03/19 12:36, , 65F
03/19 12:36, 65F
→
03/19 18:03, , 66F
03/19 18:03, 66F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):