[討論] 可能擺出五中鋒或是五控衛的比賽陣容嗎?已回收
看板NBA作者bebetterdoc (bebetterdoc)時間10年前 (2014/02/09 13:11)推噓108(120推 12噓 39→)留言171則, 132人參與討論串1/3 (看更多)
一般來說
球隊都是擺出:
控球後衛pg
得分後衛sg
小前鋒sf
大前鋒pf
中鋒c
這種陣容
也有球隊受限於球隊缺乏某個位置球員 或是教練擅長戰術
會擺出不同的陣容出場打球
那想請問一下
有可能擺出五個中鋒 或是五個控衛 這種比較特別的比賽方式嗎?
五個中鋒 優點: 籃板一把罩,進攻籃板一直抓
五個控衛 優點: 很刁鑽,每個人都可以發動進攻,進而得分
當然這樣的陣容應該還是有缺點的
不知道大家覺得五個中鋒或五個控衛的打法
好不好用?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.33.66.64
→
02/09 13:12, , 1F
02/09 13:12, 1F
推
02/09 13:12, , 2F
02/09 13:12, 2F
推
02/09 13:12, , 3F
02/09 13:12, 3F
推
02/09 13:12, , 4F
02/09 13:12, 4F
推
02/09 13:13, , 5F
02/09 13:13, 5F
→
02/09 13:13, , 6F
02/09 13:13, 6F
推
02/09 13:13, , 7F
02/09 13:13, 7F
→
02/09 13:13, , 8F
02/09 13:13, 8F
推
02/09 13:14, , 9F
02/09 13:14, 9F
推
02/09 13:14, , 10F
02/09 13:14, 10F
推
02/09 13:14, , 11F
02/09 13:14, 11F
推
02/09 13:15, , 12F
02/09 13:15, 12F
推
02/09 13:15, , 13F
02/09 13:15, 13F
推
02/09 13:15, , 14F
02/09 13:15, 14F
推
02/09 13:15, , 15F
02/09 13:15, 15F
推
02/09 13:16, , 16F
02/09 13:16, 16F
推
02/09 13:16, , 17F
02/09 13:16, 17F
→
02/09 13:16, , 18F
02/09 13:16, 18F
推
02/09 13:17, , 19F
02/09 13:17, 19F
推
02/09 13:17, , 20F
02/09 13:17, 20F
推
02/09 13:17, , 21F
02/09 13:17, 21F
→
02/09 13:17, , 22F
02/09 13:17, 22F
推
02/09 13:18, , 23F
02/09 13:18, 23F
→
02/09 13:18, , 24F
02/09 13:18, 24F
推
02/09 13:18, , 25F
02/09 13:18, 25F
推
02/09 13:18, , 26F
02/09 13:18, 26F
推
02/09 13:18, , 27F
02/09 13:18, 27F
→
02/09 13:19, , 28F
02/09 13:19, 28F
推
02/09 13:19, , 29F
02/09 13:19, 29F
→
02/09 13:20, , 30F
02/09 13:20, 30F
推
02/09 13:21, , 31F
02/09 13:21, 31F
推
02/09 13:22, , 32F
02/09 13:22, 32F
推
02/09 13:23, , 33F
02/09 13:23, 33F
→
02/09 13:24, , 34F
02/09 13:24, 34F
推
02/09 13:25, , 35F
02/09 13:25, 35F
→
02/09 13:25, , 36F
02/09 13:25, 36F
推
02/09 13:26, , 37F
02/09 13:26, 37F
推
02/09 13:27, , 38F
02/09 13:27, 38F
噓
02/09 13:28, , 39F
02/09 13:28, 39F
還有 92 則推文
推
02/09 16:00, , 132F
02/09 16:00, 132F
推
02/09 16:06, , 133F
02/09 16:06, 133F
→
02/09 16:13, , 134F
02/09 16:13, 134F
推
02/09 16:13, , 135F
02/09 16:13, 135F
推
02/09 16:27, , 136F
02/09 16:27, 136F
推
02/09 16:29, , 137F
02/09 16:29, 137F
推
02/09 16:38, , 138F
02/09 16:38, 138F
噓
02/09 17:11, , 139F
02/09 17:11, 139F
推
02/09 17:15, , 140F
02/09 17:15, 140F
推
02/09 17:21, , 141F
02/09 17:21, 141F
推
02/09 17:23, , 142F
02/09 17:23, 142F
推
02/09 17:24, , 143F
02/09 17:24, 143F
推
02/09 17:33, , 144F
02/09 17:33, 144F
推
02/09 18:16, , 145F
02/09 18:16, 145F
噓
02/09 18:41, , 146F
02/09 18:41, 146F
推
02/09 18:44, , 147F
02/09 18:44, 147F
推
02/09 18:55, , 148F
02/09 18:55, 148F
推
02/09 19:19, , 149F
02/09 19:19, 149F
推
02/09 19:53, , 150F
02/09 19:53, 150F
推
02/09 19:56, , 151F
02/09 19:56, 151F
推
02/09 20:04, , 152F
02/09 20:04, 152F
→
02/09 20:28, , 153F
02/09 20:28, 153F
推
02/09 20:43, , 154F
02/09 20:43, 154F
→
02/09 20:44, , 155F
02/09 20:44, 155F
推
02/09 20:46, , 156F
02/09 20:46, 156F
推
02/09 20:56, , 157F
02/09 20:56, 157F
推
02/09 20:58, , 158F
02/09 20:58, 158F
→
02/09 20:59, , 159F
02/09 20:59, 159F
推
02/09 21:03, , 160F
02/09 21:03, 160F
推
02/09 21:11, , 161F
02/09 21:11, 161F
→
02/09 21:33, , 162F
02/09 21:33, 162F
推
02/09 21:54, , 163F
02/09 21:54, 163F
→
02/09 22:45, , 164F
02/09 22:45, 164F
推
02/09 23:15, , 165F
02/09 23:15, 165F
推
02/09 23:40, , 166F
02/09 23:40, 166F
噓
02/10 00:37, , 167F
02/10 00:37, 167F
推
02/10 06:21, , 168F
02/10 06:21, 168F
推
02/10 12:51, , 169F
02/10 12:51, 169F
推
02/10 13:58, , 170F
02/10 13:58, 170F
→
02/11 01:01, , 171F
02/11 01:01, 171F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):