[討論] 以Kobe的實力能領多少薪水?已回收
看板NBA作者pttfft (The Show OFF!!!)時間10年前 (2013/12/18 21:47)推噓-13(44推 57噓 37→)留言138則, 100人參與討論串1/2 (看更多)
撇開迷迷最愛說的商業價值
以實力來看Kobe應該領多少薪水呢?
上季Kobe領2870萬
上季明顯老化的他
平心而論他防守還是可以
但他都把力氣都拿去進攻端刷數據 打鐵
防守端監視器
刷出27.4分，投得多 進的也還算多 46.3%命中率、三分32.4%
個人覺得上季他還是第一SG
雖然防守監視器 但進攻仍然無法忽視
領個1800萬~2000萬應該OK
這季Kobe薪水3150萬美金
目前數據13.8分4.3籃板6.3助攻 命中率42.5%、三分18.8%
剛復出、老、傷到阿基里斯腱這種嚴重運動員傷害
實力肯定大打折扣
撇開商業價值，以這季Kobe的實力
大家覺得他應該領多少比較合理呢?
--
有記者問禪師：如果歐尼爾和科比同時掉進水裡，你會先救誰？
其他記者慌了，問這種問題，這不是為難人嗎？
這時禪師淡定的回答：救歐尼爾，科比會緊緊抱著歐尼爾大腿…
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 211.76.66.241
推
12/18 21:49, , 1F
12/18 21:49, 1F
→
12/18 21:49, , 2F
12/18 21:49, 2F
推
12/18 21:49, , 3F
12/18 21:49, 3F
噓
12/18 21:49, , 4F
12/18 21:49, 4F
推
12/18 21:50, , 5F
12/18 21:50, 5F
推
12/18 21:50, , 6F
12/18 21:50, 6F
推
12/18 21:50, , 7F
12/18 21:50, 7F
噓
12/18 21:51, , 8F
12/18 21:51, 8F
→
12/18 21:52, , 9F
12/18 21:52, 9F
推
12/18 21:52, , 10F
12/18 21:52, 10F
推
12/18 21:53, , 11F
12/18 21:53, 11F
選擇老大，剛好老大巔峰期 = 湖人隊史黑暗期
推
12/18 21:53, , 12F
12/18 21:53, 12F
推
12/18 21:54, , 13F
12/18 21:54, 13F
噓
12/18 21:54, , 14F
12/18 21:54, 14F
→
12/18 21:54, , 15F
12/18 21:54, 15F
噓
12/18 21:54, , 16F
12/18 21:54, 16F
推
12/18 21:55, , 17F
12/18 21:55, 17F
推
12/18 21:55, , 18F
12/18 21:55, 18F
推
12/18 21:55, , 19F
12/18 21:55, 19F
噓
12/18 21:56, , 20F
12/18 21:56, 20F
噓
12/18 21:57, , 21F
12/18 21:57, 21F
→
12/18 21:58, , 22F
12/18 21:58, 22F
推
12/18 21:58, , 23F
12/18 21:58, 23F
噓
12/18 21:58, , 24F
12/18 21:58, 24F
噓
12/18 21:58, , 25F
12/18 21:58, 25F
推
12/18 21:58, , 26F
12/18 21:58, 26F
噓
12/18 21:58, , 27F
12/18 21:58, 27F
推
12/18 21:59, , 28F
12/18 21:59, 28F
噓
12/18 21:59, , 29F
12/18 21:59, 29F
就說撇開商業價值 看不懂嗎XDDDDD
噓
12/18 21:59, , 30F
12/18 21:59, 30F
→
12/18 21:59, , 31F
12/18 21:59, 31F
→
12/18 22:00, , 32F
12/18 22:00, 32F
推
12/18 22:00, , 33F
12/18 22:00, 33F
推
12/18 22:00, , 34F
12/18 22:00, 34F
推
12/18 22:00, , 35F
12/18 22:00, 35F
我知道你再諷刺迷迷不會看球或用高光看球~
推
12/18 22:00, , 36F
12/18 22:00, 36F
還有 62 則推文
還有 1 段內文
推
12/18 22:49, , 99F
12/18 22:49, 99F
噓
12/18 22:50, , 100F
12/18 22:50, 100F
噓
12/18 22:53, , 101F
12/18 22:53, 101F
噓
12/18 22:55, , 102F
12/18 22:55, 102F
推
12/18 22:55, , 103F
12/18 22:55, 103F
噓
12/18 22:56, , 104F
12/18 22:56, 104F
噓
12/18 22:56, , 105F
12/18 22:56, 105F
推
12/18 22:57, , 106F
12/18 22:57, 106F
噓
12/18 22:57, , 107F
12/18 22:57, 107F
→
12/18 22:57, , 108F
12/18 22:57, 108F
噓
12/18 22:57, , 109F
12/18 22:57, 109F
噓
12/18 22:57, , 110F
12/18 22:57, 110F
推
12/18 22:58, , 111F
12/18 22:58, 111F
噓
12/18 23:00, , 112F
12/18 23:00, 112F
噓
12/18 23:01, , 113F
12/18 23:01, 113F
噓
12/18 23:02, , 114F
12/18 23:02, 114F
噓
12/18 23:02, , 115F
12/18 23:02, 115F
噓
12/18 23:03, , 116F
12/18 23:03, 116F
噓
12/18 23:03, , 117F
12/18 23:03, 117F
噓
12/18 23:05, , 118F
12/18 23:05, 118F
→
12/18 23:07, , 119F
12/18 23:07, 119F
噓
12/18 23:15, , 120F
12/18 23:15, 120F
推
12/18 23:20, , 121F
12/18 23:20, 121F
噓
12/18 23:50, , 122F
12/18 23:50, 122F
噓
12/18 23:53, , 123F
12/18 23:53, 123F
噓
12/19 00:40, , 124F
12/19 00:40, 124F
噓
12/19 00:52, , 125F
12/19 00:52, 125F
推
12/19 00:55, , 126F
12/19 00:55, 126F
推
12/19 01:06, , 127F
12/19 01:06, 127F
噓
12/19 01:29, , 128F
12/19 01:29, 128F
噓
12/19 01:57, , 129F
12/19 01:57, 129F
噓
12/19 02:15, , 130F
12/19 02:15, 130F
噓
12/19 03:14, , 131F
12/19 03:14, 131F
推
12/19 03:38, , 132F
12/19 03:38, 132F
推
12/19 07:24, , 133F
12/19 07:24, 133F
噓
12/19 08:31, , 134F
12/19 08:31, 134F
噓
12/19 10:29, , 135F
12/19 10:29, 135F
噓
12/19 13:53, , 136F
12/19 13:53, 136F
噓
12/19 15:27, , 137F
12/19 15:27, 137F
推
12/22 20:01, , 138F
12/22 20:01, 138F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇)：
討論
-13
138