[心得] Lin與Iverson的防守誰好?!已回收
火箭對上七六人的比賽,Lin一直被對位吃爽,現在球員遇到Lin,吃就對了。
Lin的防守,終於被放大檢視了。
Lin的速度是快,但還快不過Iverson,今天關鍵時的切入就完全沒效;外線大爆發
時,準頭也準不過Iverson,論Lin目前的無雙模式,既不是Nash,也不是Kidd,倒像是
一半的Iverson。
今天這場就可以看出,Tyson Chandler為什麼說Lin並非是組織PG?確實不像是
個會組織的PG。坦白說,Lin只有一個戰術,就是擋拆,除此之外,就是Howard在的
Insideout,因此,Beverley也就能輕易取而代之。換言之,Lin打得不像PG時,更像SG,
Linsanity時,比較像Iverson,但還沒到Iverson那樣無雙,也沒有Iverson一樣的
crossover,那麼Lin的未來在?!要嘛Lin轉型為純射手PG,像Mark Price一樣,完全
轉型為Insideout,一來減少失誤率,更能穩定球隊的攻勢,同時更為有效率的切入。
完全Insideout的基石就在穩定的三分攻勢,就不用時時刻刻擋拆,時時刻刻掉球。外
線一有空擋便能穩定出手,內線有更大的空間放Howard單打。
其實現階段的火箭,要嘛就是Harden與Lin同時在場上,否則缺Harden或缺Lin都
不是完整的火箭,因為雙能衛才能打HarLin line,這場也可以看出Parsons並不足以
堪當大任,現階段的Parsons還無法稱作火箭Big3之一。
火箭要嘛再也容忍不了Lin的防守,交易Lin,不然就留Lin繼續與Harden連線,否
則沒有Harden,火箭也不能成事。換掉Lin,最主要的原因就是防守的爆發力不足,才
被Iso,因此要找有防守爆發力的球員不難,但同時要有得分爆發力的球員就是難上加
難,就看火箭高層的取捨。留下Lin,那麼外線射手恐怕得換更準的來,Garcia與Gasspi
的準度也許不錯,但還準不過Novak,甚至屌飛諾還比較堪其大任。但屌飛諾的身價恐怕
高過Novak與Garcia,所以要嘛找一個更準的射手來,否則Linsanity沒有三分護航,火箭
仍是隻普通的隊伍。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.233.158.201
推
11/14 11:31, , 1F
11/14 11:31, 1F
→
11/14 11:31, , 2F
11/14 11:31, 2F
推
11/14 11:31, , 3F
11/14 11:31, 3F
→
11/14 11:32, , 4F
11/14 11:32, 4F
噓
11/14 11:32, , 5F
11/14 11:32, 5F
→
11/14 11:32, , 6F
11/14 11:32, 6F
推
11/14 11:32, , 7F
11/14 11:32, 7F
噓
11/14 11:32, , 8F
11/14 11:32, 8F
→
11/14 11:32, , 9F
11/14 11:32, 9F
→
11/14 11:32, , 10F
11/14 11:32, 10F
→
11/14 11:32, , 11F
11/14 11:32, 11F
推
11/14 11:32, , 12F
11/14 11:32, 12F
噓
11/14 11:32, , 13F
11/14 11:32, 13F
推
11/14 11:32, , 14F
11/14 11:32, 14F
→
11/14 11:32, , 15F
11/14 11:32, 15F
推
11/14 11:32, , 16F
11/14 11:32, 16F
推
11/14 11:32, , 17F
11/14 11:32, 17F
→
11/14 11:32, , 18F
11/14 11:32, 18F
推
11/14 11:32, , 19F
11/14 11:32, 19F
→
11/14 11:32, , 20F
11/14 11:32, 20F
→
11/14 11:33, , 21F
11/14 11:33, 21F
推
11/14 11:33, , 22F
11/14 11:33, 22F
→
11/14 11:33, , 23F
11/14 11:33, 23F
噓
11/14 11:33, , 24F
11/14 11:33, 24F
噓
11/14 11:33, , 25F
11/14 11:33, 25F
→
11/14 11:33, , 26F
11/14 11:33, 26F
推
11/14 11:33, , 27F
11/14 11:33, 27F
→
11/14 11:33, , 28F
11/14 11:33, 28F
推
11/14 11:33, , 29F
11/14 11:33, 29F
→
11/14 11:33, , 30F
11/14 11:33, 30F
推
11/14 11:34, , 31F
11/14 11:34, 31F
→
11/14 11:34, , 32F
11/14 11:34, 32F
→
11/14 11:34, , 33F
11/14 11:34, 33F
→
11/14 11:34, , 34F
11/14 11:34, 34F
推
11/14 11:34, , 35F
11/14 11:34, 35F
→
11/14 11:34, , 36F
11/14 11:34, 36F
推
11/14 11:34, , 37F
11/14 11:34, 37F
→
11/14 11:34, , 38F
11/14 11:34, 38F
噓
11/14 11:35, , 39F
11/14 11:35, 39F
還有 89 則推文
噓
11/14 12:37, , 129F
11/14 12:37, 129F
→
11/14 12:37, , 130F
11/14 12:37, 130F
噓
11/14 12:43, , 131F
11/14 12:43, 131F
噓
11/14 12:44, , 132F
11/14 12:44, 132F
噓
11/14 12:51, , 133F
11/14 12:51, 133F
→
11/14 12:59, , 134F
11/14 12:59, 134F
推
11/14 12:59, , 135F
11/14 12:59, 135F
→
11/14 13:02, , 136F
11/14 13:02, 136F
→
11/14 13:02, , 137F
11/14 13:02, 137F
噓
11/14 13:02, , 138F
11/14 13:02, 138F
推
11/14 13:07, , 139F
11/14 13:07, 139F
→
11/14 13:08, , 140F
11/14 13:08, 140F
→
11/14 13:08, , 141F
11/14 13:08, 141F
→
11/14 13:09, , 142F
11/14 13:09, 142F
噓
11/14 13:10, , 143F
11/14 13:10, 143F
噓
11/14 13:30, , 144F
11/14 13:30, 144F
→
11/14 13:45, , 145F
11/14 13:45, 145F
噓
11/14 14:07, , 146F
11/14 14:07, 146F
→
11/14 14:11, , 147F
11/14 14:11, 147F
噓
11/14 14:24, , 148F
11/14 14:24, 148F
推
11/14 14:52, , 149F
11/14 14:52, 149F
→
11/14 14:52, , 150F
11/14 14:52, 150F
→
11/14 14:53, , 151F
11/14 14:53, 151F
噓
11/14 15:14, , 152F
11/14 15:14, 152F
噓
11/14 16:26, , 153F
11/14 16:26, 153F
噓
11/14 16:30, , 154F
11/14 16:30, 154F
噓
11/14 16:33, , 155F
11/14 16:33, 155F
推
11/14 17:00, , 156F
11/14 17:00, 156F
噓
11/14 17:21, , 157F
11/14 17:21, 157F
噓
11/14 18:02, , 158F
11/14 18:02, 158F
噓
11/14 18:26, , 159F
11/14 18:26, 159F
噓
11/14 18:34, , 160F
11/14 18:34, 160F
噓
11/14 18:52, , 161F
11/14 18:52, 161F
噓
11/14 19:01, , 162F
11/14 19:01, 162F
推
11/14 20:09, , 163F
11/14 20:09, 163F
→
11/14 20:11, , 164F
11/14 20:11, 164F
→
11/14 20:12, , 165F
11/14 20:12, 165F
→
11/14 20:13, , 166F
11/14 20:13, 166F
→
11/14 20:15, , 167F
11/14 20:15, 167F
→
11/14 22:19, , 168F
11/14 22:19, 168F