Re: [討論] 今天看火箭心得已回收
※ 引述《melomelomelo (melo)》之銘言:
: 1.火箭第一節總是一陣亂流
已經連續三場這樣,今天第一節還是落後的算少了,已經不知該講啥才好了.
: 2.三衛同時在場上的時間
火箭板自己也在討論這點,完全看不懂冰箱三衛是在擺三小的
也看不出來實際的效益表現在哪.
: 3.第三節的亂流
: 貝佛利陷入犯規麻煩後 LIN被換上來 這段期間 LIN出現很多失誤
簡單說就是火箭的進攻被看破手腳,火箭三分消失很久了,上季火箭還可以靠三雨
讓強隊翻船,本季目前為止可說是悲劇.
OK,你三分消失,但你進攻又只會依賴後衛切傳,不然就是1~5號ISO
今天Lin追分時期打的亮眼,人家河流又不是白痴,直接重點看管Lin
同時防守內縮(反正你們沒三分),冰箱自己戰術板上又畫不出個鳥來,
Lin也只能硬切看能不能切出個機會,Lin切進去就是兩三個來伺候,
然後紀錄板上就多一個失誤.
好吧,Lin迷自己也知道Lin不是CP3那個等級的,
不然火箭morey真有本事把CP3盤來換CP3切切看,CP3應該能處理的比Lin好許多.
至於有人說鬍都在散步看戲,這點其實不太對.正確的來說那個時候火箭其他四個也
都在看戲,今天換成其他人來切,也是換成另外四個看戲而已.
這明顯是是教練的問題比較大.
: (2)哈登的態度
哈登目前的問題是,他的打法只會由別人來配合他,但他不會(or不懂)去配合別人,
那他到底是擺爛還是說有心結,還是說他就真的只會一哥打法,還是說教練該自盡.
這個其實還要再觀察個幾場球才知道,現在都是猜測腦補比較多.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.167.52.206
※ 編輯: watwmark 來自: 118.167.52.206 (11/10 14:05)
推
11/10 14:05, , 1F
11/10 14:05, 1F
推
11/10 14:06, , 2F
11/10 14:06, 2F
→
11/10 14:06, , 3F
11/10 14:06, 3F
推
11/10 14:07, , 4F
11/10 14:07, 4F
推
11/10 14:07, , 5F
11/10 14:07, 5F
推
11/10 14:07, , 6F
11/10 14:07, 6F
→
11/10 14:08, , 7F
11/10 14:08, 7F
→
11/10 14:08, , 8F
11/10 14:08, 8F
推
11/10 14:08, , 9F
11/10 14:08, 9F
推
11/10 14:08, , 10F
11/10 14:08, 10F
→
11/10 14:08, , 11F
11/10 14:08, 11F
推
11/10 14:08, , 12F
11/10 14:08, 12F
→
11/10 14:08, , 13F
11/10 14:08, 13F
推
11/10 14:08, , 14F
11/10 14:08, 14F
→
11/10 14:09, , 15F
11/10 14:09, 15F
→
11/10 14:10, , 16F
11/10 14:10, 16F
→
11/10 14:10, , 17F
11/10 14:10, 17F
→
11/10 14:10, , 18F
11/10 14:10, 18F
推
11/10 14:10, , 19F
11/10 14:10, 19F
→
11/10 14:11, , 20F
11/10 14:11, 20F
推
11/10 14:12, , 21F
11/10 14:12, 21F
→
11/10 14:12, , 22F
11/10 14:12, 22F
→
11/10 14:12, , 23F
11/10 14:12, 23F
→
11/10 14:13, , 24F
11/10 14:13, 24F
噓
11/10 14:14, , 25F
11/10 14:14, 25F
→
11/10 14:14, , 26F
11/10 14:14, 26F
推
11/10 14:14, , 27F
11/10 14:14, 27F
推
11/10 14:14, , 28F
11/10 14:14, 28F
→
11/10 14:14, , 29F
11/10 14:14, 29F
推
11/10 14:15, , 30F
11/10 14:15, 30F
推
11/10 14:16, , 31F
11/10 14:16, 31F
推
11/10 14:16, , 32F
11/10 14:16, 32F
推
11/10 14:17, , 33F
11/10 14:17, 33F
→
11/10 14:17, , 34F
11/10 14:17, 34F
→
11/10 14:17, , 35F
11/10 14:17, 35F
→
11/10 14:17, , 36F
11/10 14:17, 36F
→
11/10 14:17, , 37F
11/10 14:17, 37F
噓
11/10 14:18, , 38F
11/10 14:18, 38F
噓
11/10 14:19, , 39F
11/10 14:19, 39F
還有 57 則推文
推
11/10 14:44, , 97F
11/10 14:44, 97F
→
11/10 14:44, , 98F
11/10 14:44, 98F
→
11/10 14:44, , 99F
11/10 14:44, 99F
→
11/10 14:45, , 100F
11/10 14:45, 100F
→
11/10 14:45, , 101F
11/10 14:45, 101F
→
11/10 14:45, , 102F
11/10 14:45, 102F
→
11/10 14:45, , 103F
11/10 14:45, 103F
→
11/10 14:45, , 104F
11/10 14:45, 104F
→
11/10 14:46, , 105F
11/10 14:46, 105F
→
11/10 14:46, , 106F
11/10 14:46, 106F
→
11/10 14:46, , 107F
11/10 14:46, 107F
推
11/10 14:47, , 108F
11/10 14:47, 108F
→
11/10 14:47, , 109F
11/10 14:47, 109F
→
11/10 14:48, , 110F
11/10 14:48, 110F
推
11/10 14:48, , 111F
11/10 14:48, 111F
推
11/10 14:48, , 112F
11/10 14:48, 112F
→
11/10 14:49, , 113F
11/10 14:49, 113F
→
11/10 14:49, , 114F
11/10 14:49, 114F
→
11/10 14:49, , 115F
11/10 14:49, 115F
→
11/10 14:50, , 116F
11/10 14:50, 116F
推
11/10 14:50, , 117F
11/10 14:50, 117F
→
11/10 14:51, , 118F
11/10 14:51, 118F
→
11/10 14:51, , 119F
11/10 14:51, 119F
→
11/10 14:52, , 120F
11/10 14:52, 120F
推
11/10 14:52, , 121F
11/10 14:52, 121F
→
11/10 14:53, , 122F
11/10 14:53, 122F
推
11/10 14:53, , 123F
11/10 14:53, 123F
→
11/10 14:53, , 124F
11/10 14:53, 124F
→
11/10 14:54, , 125F
11/10 14:54, 125F
→
11/10 14:54, , 126F
11/10 14:54, 126F
→
11/10 14:54, , 127F
11/10 14:54, 127F
→
11/10 14:55, , 128F
11/10 14:55, 128F
→
11/10 14:55, , 129F
11/10 14:55, 129F
→
11/10 14:55, , 130F
11/10 14:55, 130F
→
11/10 14:56, , 131F
11/10 14:56, 131F
→
11/10 14:56, , 132F
11/10 14:56, 132F
→
11/10 14:58, , 133F
11/10 14:58, 133F
推
11/10 17:06, , 134F
11/10 17:06, 134F
推
11/10 17:32, , 135F
11/10 17:32, 135F
推
11/10 18:10, , 136F
11/10 18:10, 136F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
討論
63
163
以下文章回應了本文:
討論
35
62
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 4 篇):
討論
35
62
討論
12
42
討論
41
136
討論
63
163