[討論] 都沒受傷前 西河與羅斯誰強?已回收
這兩個人就是東西區強力控衛的代表人物
ROSE就不用說了 拿過MVP
公牛有他後戰績就起飛了 而且切入拉竿都超強
完全是球隊的一哥 展現出王者的霸氣
唯一另人詬病的就是外線不穩 而現在的ROSE跳投
感覺還有點像西河 跳的老高 在把球送出去
而西河也是體能勁爆又耐操全勤 只可惜被比佛利給弄掉了
他在雷霆 個人感覺不下KD 看看KD去年沒有西河 可憐的雷霆
都快被火箭撞翻了 沒有西河 雷霆一點也不行 可見西河多重要
西河的單打也是很強 切入運球也不輸ROSE 感覺中距離還比ROSE準一些
看這兩個人 好像看到了以前的MARBURY與FRANCIS一樣 希望都能健康打下去
如果單論這兩人的話沒受傷前 是誰比較強呢??
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.167.254.13
推
10/28 23:57, , 1F
10/28 23:57, 1F
推
10/28 23:57, , 2F
10/28 23:57, 2F
推
10/28 23:58, , 3F
10/28 23:58, 3F
→
10/28 23:58, , 4F
10/28 23:58, 4F
→
10/28 23:58, , 5F
10/28 23:58, 5F
推
10/28 23:59, , 6F
10/28 23:59, 6F
推
10/28 23:59, , 7F
10/28 23:59, 7F
推
10/28 23:59, , 8F
10/28 23:59, 8F
推
10/28 23:59, , 9F
10/28 23:59, 9F
推
10/28 23:59, , 10F
10/28 23:59, 10F
→
10/29 00:00, , 11F
10/29 00:00, 11F
→
10/29 00:00, , 12F
10/29 00:00, 12F
推
10/29 00:01, , 13F
10/29 00:01, 13F
→
10/29 00:01, , 14F
10/29 00:01, 14F
→
10/29 00:02, , 15F
10/29 00:02, 15F
→
10/29 00:02, , 16F
10/29 00:02, 16F
→
10/29 00:04, , 17F
10/29 00:04, 17F
推
10/29 00:04, , 18F
10/29 00:04, 18F
推
10/29 00:05, , 19F
10/29 00:05, 19F
推
10/29 00:05, , 20F
10/29 00:05, 20F
→
10/29 00:06, , 21F
10/29 00:06, 21F
推
10/29 00:08, , 22F
10/29 00:08, 22F
→
10/29 00:08, , 23F
10/29 00:08, 23F
→
10/29 00:10, , 24F
10/29 00:10, 24F
→
10/29 00:10, , 25F
10/29 00:10, 25F
推
10/29 00:11, , 26F
10/29 00:11, 26F
推
10/29 00:11, , 27F
10/29 00:11, 27F
→
10/29 00:11, , 28F
10/29 00:11, 28F
推
10/29 00:14, , 29F
10/29 00:14, 29F
→
10/29 00:15, , 30F
10/29 00:15, 30F
推
10/29 00:16, , 31F
10/29 00:16, 31F
推
10/29 00:18, , 32F
10/29 00:18, 32F
噓
10/29 00:18, , 33F
10/29 00:18, 33F
推
10/29 00:20, , 34F
10/29 00:20, 34F
推
10/29 00:20, , 35F
10/29 00:20, 35F
推
10/29 00:23, , 36F
10/29 00:23, 36F
→
10/29 00:25, , 37F
10/29 00:25, 37F
→
10/29 00:25, , 38F
10/29 00:25, 38F
→
10/29 00:25, , 39F
10/29 00:25, 39F
還有 146 則推文
推
10/29 13:17, , 186F
10/29 13:17, 186F
→
10/29 13:42, , 187F
10/29 13:42, 187F
推
10/29 13:45, , 188F
10/29 13:45, 188F
→
10/29 13:51, , 189F
10/29 13:51, 189F
→
10/29 13:53, , 190F
10/29 13:53, 190F
推
10/29 13:53, , 191F
10/29 13:53, 191F
→
10/29 13:54, , 192F
10/29 13:54, 192F
→
10/29 14:25, , 193F
10/29 14:25, 193F
噓
10/29 14:45, , 194F
10/29 14:45, 194F
推
10/29 14:47, , 195F
10/29 14:47, 195F
推
10/29 14:51, , 196F
10/29 14:51, 196F
→
10/29 14:51, , 197F
10/29 14:51, 197F
推
10/29 14:52, , 198F
10/29 14:52, 198F
推
10/29 14:59, , 199F
10/29 14:59, 199F
推
10/29 15:14, , 200F
10/29 15:14, 200F
推
10/29 15:44, , 201F
10/29 15:44, 201F
推
10/29 15:46, , 202F
10/29 15:46, 202F
推
10/29 16:52, , 203F
10/29 16:52, 203F
→
10/29 17:03, , 204F
10/29 17:03, 204F
→
10/29 17:33, , 205F
10/29 17:33, 205F
推
10/29 17:37, , 206F
10/29 17:37, 206F
推
10/29 17:42, , 207F
10/29 17:42, 207F
推
10/29 17:54, , 208F
10/29 17:54, 208F
推
10/29 17:58, , 209F
10/29 17:58, 209F
推
10/29 18:02, , 210F
10/29 18:02, 210F
推
10/29 18:07, , 211F
10/29 18:07, 211F
噓
10/29 18:11, , 212F
10/29 18:11, 212F
→
10/29 18:11, , 213F
10/29 18:11, 213F
推
10/29 18:44, , 214F
10/29 18:44, 214F
推
10/29 20:03, , 215F
10/29 20:03, 215F
推
10/29 20:19, , 216F
10/29 20:19, 216F
推
10/29 20:56, , 217F
10/29 20:56, 217F
推
10/29 22:02, , 218F
10/29 22:02, 218F
推
10/29 22:56, , 219F
10/29 22:56, 219F
推
10/30 00:47, , 220F
10/30 00:47, 220F
推
10/30 02:01, , 221F
10/30 02:01, 221F
推
10/30 03:05, , 222F
10/30 03:05, 222F
推
10/30 09:52, , 223F
10/30 09:52, 223F
推
10/30 10:13, , 224F
10/30 10:13, 224F
→
10/30 19:10, , 225F
10/30 19:10, 225F
討論串 (同標題文章)