[情報] Dudley:Payton說Stockton更難防很可笑已回收
Dudley:Payton說Stockton更難防很可笑
http://voice.hupu.com/nba/1496592.html
此前接受採訪時,前NBA球星Gary Payton表示,控衛John Stockton比Michael Jordan更
難防。針對這一言論,Jared Dudley表示Payton的看法很可笑。
“我喜歡Payton,但是那樣的說法是荒謬可笑的。” Dudley表示道。
至於理由,Dudley表示那是因為Michael Jordan是史上最偉大的得分手之一。
“MJ肯定是我們見過的最棒的進攻球員,也許Wilton Chamberlain或者Kareem
Abdul-Jabbar也很棒,但是說Stockton更難防!那是瘋狂的。” Dudley表示。
Dudley表示,如果Payton說考慮到Stockton做了很多掩護,所以防守Stockton會是不一樣
的挑戰,他會接受這樣的說法,但是如果說更難防守,他表示自己不認同。
“MJ場均可以得到30分。” Dudley表示。
此外,也有球迷通過推特問Dudley。
“好吧,JD(Dudley),讓我來問問你這個問題吧。當Steve Nash在他的巔峰狀態時,他是
不是很難防守的?”球迷問道。
“是的!但是沒有比防守Kobe Bryant更難!” Dudley回復道。
“我明白Payton的意思是,Stockton從不會用垃圾話回擊他,這讓他更難解讀Stockton,
而MJ會回擊他,這讓Payton打得更好了。” Dudley繼續寫道。
講到最後還是扯到老大
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 1.170.252.130
噓
09/04 10:04, , 1F
09/04 10:04, 1F
→
09/04 10:08, , 2F
09/04 10:08, 2F
噓
09/04 10:08, , 3F
09/04 10:08, 3F
→
09/04 10:11, , 4F
09/04 10:11, 4F
噓
09/04 10:11, , 5F
09/04 10:11, 5F
→
09/04 10:11, , 6F
09/04 10:11, 6F
噓
09/04 10:12, , 7F
09/04 10:12, 7F
噓
09/04 10:13, , 8F
09/04 10:13, 8F
推
09/04 10:13, , 9F
09/04 10:13, 9F
推
09/04 10:17, , 10F
09/04 10:17, 10F
噓
09/04 10:17, , 11F
09/04 10:17, 11F
推
09/04 10:17, , 12F
09/04 10:17, 12F
噓
09/04 10:17, , 13F
09/04 10:17, 13F
推
09/04 10:18, , 14F
09/04 10:18, 14F
噓
09/04 10:19, , 15F
09/04 10:19, 15F
噓
09/04 10:22, , 16F
09/04 10:22, 16F
→
09/04 10:24, , 17F
09/04 10:24, 17F
→
09/04 10:24, , 18F
09/04 10:24, 18F
推
09/04 10:24, , 19F
09/04 10:24, 19F
噓
09/04 10:26, , 20F
09/04 10:26, 20F
推
09/04 10:26, , 21F
09/04 10:26, 21F
噓
09/04 10:27, , 22F
09/04 10:27, 22F
推
09/04 10:27, , 23F
09/04 10:27, 23F
→
09/04 10:27, , 24F
09/04 10:27, 24F
噓
09/04 10:27, , 25F
09/04 10:27, 25F
推
09/04 10:30, , 26F
09/04 10:30, 26F
推
09/04 10:31, , 27F
09/04 10:31, 27F
推
09/04 10:32, , 28F
09/04 10:32, 28F
推
09/04 10:33, , 29F
09/04 10:33, 29F
推
09/04 10:34, , 30F
09/04 10:34, 30F
噓
09/04 10:35, , 31F
09/04 10:35, 31F
→
09/04 10:37, , 32F
09/04 10:37, 32F
噓
09/04 10:38, , 33F
09/04 10:38, 33F
噓
09/04 10:38, , 34F
09/04 10:38, 34F
→
09/04 10:38, , 35F
09/04 10:38, 35F
噓
09/04 10:38, , 36F
09/04 10:38, 36F
噓
09/04 10:39, , 37F
09/04 10:39, 37F
→
09/04 10:39, , 38F
09/04 10:39, 38F
推
09/04 10:39, , 39F
09/04 10:39, 39F
還有 52 則推文
噓
09/04 15:17, , 92F
09/04 15:17, 92F
推
09/04 16:55, , 93F
09/04 16:55, 93F
→
09/04 16:55, , 94F
09/04 16:55, 94F
噓
09/04 16:55, , 95F
09/04 16:55, 95F
→
09/04 16:56, , 96F
09/04 16:56, 96F
推
09/04 17:11, , 97F
09/04 17:11, 97F
推
09/04 17:29, , 98F
09/04 17:29, 98F
→
09/04 17:36, , 99F
09/04 17:36, 99F
→
09/04 17:36, , 100F
09/04 17:36, 100F
噓
09/04 17:41, , 101F
09/04 17:41, 101F
推
09/04 18:19, , 102F
09/04 18:19, 102F
噓
09/04 18:24, , 103F
09/04 18:24, 103F
噓
09/04 19:46, , 104F
09/04 19:46, 104F
推
09/04 20:22, , 105F
09/04 20:22, 105F
噓
09/04 20:23, , 106F
09/04 20:23, 106F
噓
09/04 20:37, , 107F
09/04 20:37, 107F
推
09/04 20:46, , 108F
09/04 20:46, 108F
→
09/04 20:47, , 109F
09/04 20:47, 109F
→
09/04 20:48, , 110F
09/04 20:48, 110F
→
09/04 20:48, , 111F
09/04 20:48, 111F
→
09/04 20:49, , 112F
09/04 20:49, 112F
→
09/04 20:50, , 113F
09/04 20:50, 113F
→
09/04 20:50, , 114F
09/04 20:50, 114F
推
09/04 20:51, , 115F
09/04 20:51, 115F
推
09/04 21:34, , 116F
09/04 21:34, 116F
→
09/04 21:41, , 117F
09/04 21:41, 117F
噓
09/04 22:36, , 118F
09/04 22:36, 118F
推
09/04 23:40, , 119F
09/04 23:40, 119F
→
09/04 23:54, , 120F
09/04 23:54, 120F
噓
09/04 23:58, , 121F
09/04 23:58, 121F
噓
09/05 01:08, , 122F
09/05 01:08, 122F
推
09/05 01:43, , 123F
09/05 01:43, 123F
推
09/05 04:33, , 124F
09/05 04:33, 124F
→
09/05 04:33, , 125F
09/05 04:33, 125F
噓
09/05 10:12, , 126F
09/05 10:12, 126F
推
09/05 11:34, , 127F
09/05 11:34, 127F
→
09/05 11:35, , 128F
09/05 11:35, 128F
推
09/05 11:44, , 129F
09/05 11:44, 129F
噓
09/05 14:42, , 130F
09/05 14:42, 130F
噓
09/12 03:37, , 131F
09/12 03:37, 131F