[討論] Greg Oden對熱火真的有幫助嗎?已回收
前幾天看新聞Greg Oden加入熱火,
支持熱火隊的人們歡聲鼓舞就好像天降甘霖,
可仔細一想Greg Oden真的是熱火的即時雨嗎?
我不是否認看輕他的身手,可是他是一個右膝蓋骨的微裂傷+左膝碎骨球員,
看看阿罵也是跟他右膝蓋同樣狀況+同樣治療,傷後復出的爆發力明顯跟傷前有差,
最致命的一點就是,他根本不適合熱火的球風,
Greg Oden的球風其實就跟木桶伯差不多,
可當年木桶伯在76人最被詬病的一點,就是拖慢了球隊的速度,
熱火隊球風是一個防守反擊,現在多了Greg Oden這種陣地戰的球員,
真的是熱火隊需要的甘霖嗎?
還是陰謀論與其幫助其他球隊加強後補戰力,還不如低薪收下當吉祥物!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.44.171.25
→
08/04 11:15, , 1F
08/04 11:15, 1F
→
08/04 11:15, , 2F
08/04 11:15, 2F
推
08/04 11:16, , 3F
08/04 11:16, 3F
看了一下數據波許211
可是別忘了熱火球衣退休的Zo他身高不到210人家中鋒可猛了
→
08/04 11:18, , 4F
08/04 11:18, 4F
推
08/04 11:19, , 5F
08/04 11:19, 5F
→
08/04 11:19, , 6F
08/04 11:19, 6F
→
08/04 11:20, , 7F
08/04 11:20, 7F
我修改了一下把快打旋風取消,只剩下防守反擊
推
08/04 11:20, , 8F
08/04 11:20, 8F
推
08/04 11:20, , 9F
08/04 11:20, 9F
我理想中最適合熱火的中鋒是健康的拳王....
→
08/04 11:20, , 10F
08/04 11:20, 10F
→
08/04 11:21, , 11F
08/04 11:21, 11F
→
08/04 11:21, , 12F
08/04 11:21, 12F
→
08/04 11:22, , 13F
08/04 11:22, 13F
推
08/04 11:23, , 14F
08/04 11:23, 14F
→
08/04 11:23, , 15F
08/04 11:23, 15F
→
08/04 11:23, , 16F
08/04 11:23, 16F
→
08/04 11:23, , 17F
08/04 11:23, 17F
→
08/04 11:24, , 18F
08/04 11:24, 18F
→
08/04 11:25, , 19F
08/04 11:25, 19F
→
08/04 11:25, , 20F
08/04 11:25, 20F
推
08/04 11:26, , 21F
08/04 11:26, 21F
→
08/04 11:26, , 22F
08/04 11:26, 22F
推
08/04 11:26, , 23F
08/04 11:26, 23F
→
08/04 11:26, , 24F
08/04 11:26, 24F
推
08/04 11:27, , 25F
08/04 11:27, 25F
→
08/04 11:27, , 26F
08/04 11:27, 26F
推
08/04 11:28, , 27F
08/04 11:28, 27F
推
08/04 11:30, , 28F
08/04 11:30, 28F
推
08/04 11:31, , 29F
08/04 11:31, 29F
推
08/04 11:31, , 30F
08/04 11:31, 30F
推
08/04 11:32, , 31F
08/04 11:32, 31F
→
08/04 11:33, , 32F
08/04 11:33, 32F
推
08/04 11:35, , 33F
08/04 11:35, 33F
推
08/04 11:36, , 34F
08/04 11:36, 34F
推
08/04 11:37, , 35F
08/04 11:37, 35F
→
08/04 11:37, , 36F
08/04 11:37, 36F
還有 23 則推文
還有 2 段內文
推
08/04 12:19, , 60F
08/04 12:19, 60F
推
08/04 12:24, , 61F
08/04 12:24, 61F
推
08/04 12:30, , 62F
08/04 12:30, 62F
→
08/04 12:30, , 63F
08/04 12:30, 63F
噓
08/04 12:42, , 64F
08/04 12:42, 64F
推
08/04 12:47, , 65F
08/04 12:47, 65F
→
08/04 12:48, , 66F
08/04 12:48, 66F
推
08/04 12:49, , 67F
08/04 12:49, 67F
推
08/04 12:50, , 68F
08/04 12:50, 68F
推
08/04 12:54, , 69F
08/04 12:54, 69F
→
08/04 12:55, , 70F
08/04 12:55, 70F
→
08/04 13:02, , 71F
08/04 13:02, 71F
→
08/04 13:02, , 72F
08/04 13:02, 72F
推
08/04 13:07, , 73F
08/04 13:07, 73F
推
08/04 13:19, , 74F
08/04 13:19, 74F
噓
08/04 13:19, , 75F
08/04 13:19, 75F
→
08/04 13:21, , 76F
08/04 13:21, 76F
→
08/04 13:29, , 77F
08/04 13:29, 77F
推
08/04 13:44, , 78F
08/04 13:44, 78F
噓
08/04 13:58, , 79F
08/04 13:58, 79F
→
08/04 14:07, , 80F
08/04 14:07, 80F
→
08/04 14:09, , 81F
08/04 14:09, 81F
→
08/04 14:11, , 82F
08/04 14:11, 82F
→
08/04 14:35, , 83F
08/04 14:35, 83F
推
08/04 14:55, , 84F
08/04 14:55, 84F
→
08/04 14:56, , 85F
08/04 14:56, 85F
→
08/04 14:58, , 86F
08/04 14:58, 86F
→
08/04 14:58, , 87F
08/04 14:58, 87F
推
08/04 15:00, , 88F
08/04 15:00, 88F
→
08/04 15:19, , 89F
08/04 15:19, 89F
→
08/04 17:46, , 90F
08/04 17:46, 90F
推
08/04 18:04, , 91F
08/04 18:04, 91F
推
08/04 21:36, , 92F
08/04 21:36, 92F
噓
08/04 22:13, , 93F
08/04 22:13, 93F
推
08/04 22:26, , 94F
08/04 22:26, 94F
→
08/04 22:26, , 95F
08/04 22:26, 95F
→
08/04 22:27, , 96F
08/04 22:27, 96F
噓
08/04 22:40, , 97F
08/04 22:40, 97F
→
08/05 10:24, , 98F
08/05 10:24, 98F
推
08/06 09:59, , 99F
08/06 09:59, 99F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 5 篇):