Re: [討論] 馬刺到底對LBJ做了什麼戰術防守?已回收
※ 引述《signm (sin)》之銘言:
: 竟然可以把如此強的LBJ防成這樣
: 從頭鬼隱到結束
: 不注意還以為今天LBJ沒上場
: 看今天馬刺頂多作簡單包夾防守而已
: 雖然今天馬刺三分是贏球關鍵
: 但LBJ竟然打成這樣,實在很扯
看到很多人拿LBJ跟MJ來比,(老大已經比不上兩人,不列入),
兩人所遭遇到的防守都很猛烈,但是我覺得LBJ遇到的防守程度比較強!!!
限制籃球之神的秘密--詹姆士法則:
1~防守球員退後一步,放中長距離放詹姆士投球!!
2~旁邊有人隨時準備包夾!!
3~區域防守之下,禁區球員比較多!!
4~詹姆士吸怪後分球,隊友投不進!!
㊣無人能破解的了㊣
喬丹法則:
1~喬丹接球後,守方準備收縮與包夾!!
㊣簡單的收縮與包夾㊣
如果兩人對調,MJ遇到詹姆士法則鐵定死,LBJ遇到喬丹法則就輾過去就行了!!!
--
1.音樂聽方大同,陳奕迅,張懸 6.冬天一定有圍巾,手上還要拿書
2.看美國影集,不看台日韓劇 7.帶粗框眼鏡
3.唸starbucks而不會去唸星巴克 8.念大學的時候總是很晚進教室
4.看村上春樹的1Q84 9.網誌或MSN暱稱會寫的很文藝
5.不看籃球棒球 10.喜歡打 :) 這個符號
一題一分 0沒質感3你很潮7潮到都濕了10
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.42.250.193
→
06/12 11:49, , 1F
06/12 11:49, 1F
噓
06/12 11:49, , 2F
06/12 11:49, 2F
噓
06/12 11:49, , 3F
06/12 11:49, 3F
推
06/12 11:49, , 4F
06/12 11:49, 4F
中肯,現代籃球真的進步太多!!!
噓
06/12 11:49, , 5F
06/12 11:49, 5F
推
06/12 11:49, , 6F
06/12 11:49, 6F
→
06/12 11:49, , 7F
06/12 11:49, 7F
→
06/12 11:49, , 8F
06/12 11:49, 8F
噓
06/12 11:49, , 9F
06/12 11:49, 9F
→
06/12 11:50, , 10F
06/12 11:50, 10F
推
06/12 11:50, , 11F
06/12 11:50, 11F
→
06/12 11:50, , 12F
06/12 11:50, 12F
喬丹法則只是名字比較屌,還不就收縮跟包夾,頗呵!
→
06/12 11:50, , 13F
06/12 11:50, 13F
噓
06/12 11:50, , 14F
06/12 11:50, 14F
噓
06/12 11:50, , 15F
06/12 11:50, 15F
→
06/12 11:50, , 16F
06/12 11:50, 16F
噓
06/12 11:50, , 17F
06/12 11:50, 17F
噓
06/12 11:50, , 18F
06/12 11:50, 18F
噓
06/12 11:50, , 19F
06/12 11:50, 19F
※ 編輯: shanteknight 來自: 114.42.250.193 (06/12 11:51)
噓
06/12 11:50, , 20F
06/12 11:50, 20F
→
06/12 11:50, , 21F
06/12 11:50, 21F
噓
06/12 11:50, , 22F
06/12 11:50, 22F
噓
06/12 11:50, , 23F
06/12 11:50, 23F
→
06/12 11:51, , 24F
06/12 11:51, 24F
→
06/12 11:51, , 25F
06/12 11:51, 25F
噓
06/12 11:51, , 26F
06/12 11:51, 26F
噓
06/12 11:51, , 27F
06/12 11:51, 27F
噓
06/12 11:51, , 28F
06/12 11:51, 28F
噓
06/12 11:51, , 29F
06/12 11:51, 29F
→
06/12 11:51, , 30F
06/12 11:51, 30F
→
06/12 11:51, , 31F
06/12 11:51, 31F
噓
06/12 11:51, , 32F
06/12 11:51, 32F
→
06/12 11:51, , 33F
06/12 11:51, 33F
噓
06/12 11:51, , 34F
06/12 11:51, 34F
→
06/12 11:52, , 35F
06/12 11:52, 35F
噓
06/12 11:52, , 36F
06/12 11:52, 36F
還有 53 則推文
噓
06/12 12:39, , 90F
06/12 12:39, 90F
噓
06/12 12:42, , 91F
06/12 12:42, 91F
→
06/12 12:43, , 92F
06/12 12:43, 92F
→
06/12 12:56, , 93F
06/12 12:56, 93F
→
06/12 13:04, , 94F
06/12 13:04, 94F
噓
06/12 13:12, , 95F
06/12 13:12, 95F
噓
06/12 13:15, , 96F
06/12 13:15, 96F
推
06/12 13:15, , 97F
06/12 13:15, 97F
→
06/12 13:16, , 98F
06/12 13:16, 98F
噓
06/12 13:23, , 99F
06/12 13:23, 99F
噓
06/12 13:26, , 100F
06/12 13:26, 100F
→
06/12 13:26, , 101F
06/12 13:26, 101F
噓
06/12 13:37, , 102F
06/12 13:37, 102F
噓
06/12 14:12, , 103F
06/12 14:12, 103F
噓
06/12 14:59, , 104F
06/12 14:59, 104F
→
06/12 15:00, , 105F
06/12 15:00, 105F
→
06/12 15:01, , 106F
06/12 15:01, 106F
噓
06/12 15:21, , 107F
06/12 15:21, 107F
噓
06/12 16:08, , 108F
06/12 16:08, 108F
噓
06/12 16:09, , 109F
06/12 16:09, 109F
噓
06/12 16:14, , 110F
06/12 16:14, 110F
噓
06/12 16:31, , 111F
06/12 16:31, 111F
→
06/12 16:31, , 112F
06/12 16:31, 112F
噓
06/12 17:12, , 113F
06/12 17:12, 113F
噓
06/12 17:54, , 114F
06/12 17:54, 114F
→
06/12 18:56, , 115F
06/12 18:56, 115F
→
06/12 19:02, , 116F
06/12 19:02, 116F
噓
06/12 19:04, , 117F
06/12 19:04, 117F
噓
06/12 19:14, , 118F
06/12 19:14, 118F
噓
06/12 19:37, , 119F
06/12 19:37, 119F
噓
06/12 20:32, , 120F
06/12 20:32, 120F
噓
06/12 21:02, , 121F
06/12 21:02, 121F
噓
06/12 21:11, , 122F
06/12 21:11, 122F
噓
06/12 21:28, , 123F
06/12 21:28, 123F
噓
06/12 21:33, , 124F
06/12 21:33, 124F
噓
06/12 22:03, , 125F
06/12 22:03, 125F
噓
06/13 03:27, , 126F
06/13 03:27, 126F
噓
06/13 12:02, , 127F
06/13 12:02, 127F
噓
06/13 20:52, , 128F
06/13 20:52, 128F
→
06/13 20:53, , 129F
06/13 20:53, 129F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 7 篇):