[討論] NBA怎不改成贏的可以吸收對手球員已回收
改成如果每贏一輪
就可以從對手挑一名當成自己的隊友
這樣子如果我支持的球隊輸球了
我還可以繼續看下去 畢竟有一名球星被對手吸收了
就會想繼續支持下去
然後打到最後final
等同吸收各隊球迷
收視率不就暴增了
大家覺得這個方案可不可行呢?
最後總冠軍在和敗北聯軍打7戰4勝
增加可看性
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 1.171.228.60
→
06/04 19:40, , 1F
06/04 19:40, 1F
噓
06/04 19:41, , 2F
06/04 19:41, 2F
推
06/04 19:41, , 3F
06/04 19:41, 3F
推
06/04 19:41, , 4F
06/04 19:41, 4F
推
06/04 19:41, , 5F
06/04 19:41, 5F
推
06/04 19:41, , 6F
06/04 19:41, 6F
噓
06/04 19:41, , 7F
06/04 19:41, 7F
→
06/04 19:42, , 8F
06/04 19:42, 8F
→
06/04 19:42, , 9F
06/04 19:42, 9F
噓
06/04 19:42, , 10F
06/04 19:42, 10F
噓
06/04 19:43, , 11F
06/04 19:43, 11F
推
06/04 19:43, , 12F
06/04 19:43, 12F
推
06/04 19:45, , 13F
06/04 19:45, 13F
噓
06/04 19:45, , 14F
06/04 19:45, 14F
推
06/04 19:45, , 15F
06/04 19:45, 15F
噓
06/04 19:47, , 16F
06/04 19:47, 16F
→
06/04 19:48, , 17F
06/04 19:48, 17F
→
06/04 19:48, , 18F
06/04 19:48, 18F
噓
06/04 19:48, , 19F
06/04 19:48, 19F
噓
06/04 19:49, , 20F
06/04 19:49, 20F
→
06/04 19:50, , 21F
06/04 19:50, 21F
噓
06/04 19:53, , 22F
06/04 19:53, 22F
推
06/04 19:53, , 23F
06/04 19:53, 23F
→
06/04 19:53, , 24F
06/04 19:53, 24F
→
06/04 19:54, , 25F
06/04 19:54, 25F
→
06/04 19:54, , 26F
06/04 19:54, 26F
推
06/04 19:54, , 27F
06/04 19:54, 27F
推
06/04 19:56, , 28F
06/04 19:56, 28F
推
06/04 19:56, , 29F
06/04 19:56, 29F
推
06/04 19:56, , 30F
06/04 19:56, 30F
推
06/04 19:57, , 31F
06/04 19:57, 31F
→
06/04 19:58, , 32F
06/04 19:58, 32F
推
06/04 19:59, , 33F
06/04 19:59, 33F
噓
06/04 19:59, , 34F
06/04 19:59, 34F
噓
06/04 20:02, , 35F
06/04 20:02, 35F
噓
06/04 20:02, , 36F
06/04 20:02, 36F
推
06/04 20:04, , 37F
06/04 20:04, 37F
→
06/04 20:05, , 38F
06/04 20:05, 38F
→
06/04 20:06, , 39F
06/04 20:06, 39F
噓
06/04 20:12, , 40F
06/04 20:12, 40F
噓
06/04 20:15, , 41F
06/04 20:15, 41F
→
06/04 20:20, , 42F
06/04 20:20, 42F
→
06/04 20:20, , 43F
06/04 20:20, 43F
→
06/04 20:21, , 44F
06/04 20:21, 44F
噓
06/04 20:22, , 45F
06/04 20:22, 45F
推
06/04 20:24, , 46F
06/04 20:24, 46F
→
06/04 20:26, , 47F
06/04 20:26, 47F
噓
06/04 20:31, , 48F
06/04 20:31, 48F
→
06/04 20:34, , 49F
06/04 20:34, 49F
噓
06/04 20:40, , 50F
06/04 20:40, 50F
→
06/04 20:40, , 51F
06/04 20:40, 51F
→
06/04 20:41, , 52F
06/04 20:41, 52F
→
06/04 20:42, , 53F
06/04 20:42, 53F
噓
06/04 20:44, , 54F
06/04 20:44, 54F
→
06/04 20:49, , 55F
06/04 20:49, 55F
噓
06/04 20:50, , 56F
06/04 20:50, 56F
噓
06/04 21:00, , 57F
06/04 21:00, 57F
→
06/04 21:03, , 58F
06/04 21:03, 58F
噓
06/04 21:15, , 59F
06/04 21:15, 59F
噓
06/04 21:20, , 60F
06/04 21:20, 60F
推
06/04 21:27, , 61F
06/04 21:27, 61F
推
06/04 21:43, , 62F
06/04 21:43, 62F
→
06/04 22:01, , 63F
06/04 22:01, 63F
推
06/04 22:18, , 64F
06/04 22:18, 64F
噓
06/04 22:18, , 65F
06/04 22:18, 65F
噓
06/04 22:44, , 66F
06/04 22:44, 66F
噓
06/04 23:47, , 67F
06/04 23:47, 67F
推
06/05 00:55, , 68F
06/05 00:55, 68F
噓
06/05 02:14, , 69F
06/05 02:14, 69F
推
06/05 09:17, , 70F
06/05 09:17, 70F
推
06/05 19:38, , 71F
06/05 19:38, 71F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):