[情報] 西冠決賽整體收視率已回收

看板NBA作者 (回憶比真實精彩)時間11年前 (2013/05/30 11:12), 編輯推噓50(53推 3噓 28→)
留言84則, 62人參與, 最新討論串1/1
http://tinyurl.com/pmasesy A lackluster Spurs/Grizzlies series finished with a series-high on Monday night, but that was still down big from previous years. Game 4 of the Spurs/Grizzlies NBA Western Conference Finals drew 5.2 million viewers on ESPN Monday night, down 53% from Heat/Celtics Game 4 last year (11.1M), and down 30% from Mavericks/Thunder Game 4 in 2011 (7.4M). Compared to Game 4 of last year's Thunder/Spurs WCF on TNT (6.5M), Monday's viewership declined by 20%. Spurs/Grizzlies earned the smallest audience for a Game 4 in the Conference Finals since 2007, when Spurs/Jazz Game 4 drew 4.6 million on ESPN and Pistons/Cavaliers Game 4 drew 4.7 million on TNT. Game 4 was the only telecast of the four-game series to earn at least five million viewers. To put that in perspective, seven of the 11 second round games involving the Spurs and Grizzlies topped the five million mark — with five of the six Spurs/Warriors games drawing a larger audience than any Spurs/Grizzlies game. On Saturday, Game 3 of the series drew 4.9 million viewers — down 35% from Heat/Celtics Game 3 last year (7.6M), and down 20% from Mavericks/ Thunder Game 3 in 2011 (6.2M). The game also trailed Game 3 of last year's Thunder/Spurs WCF on TNT (7.1M) by 31%. Like Monday's Game 4, Saturday's game ranks as the least-viewed Game 3 of a conference final since 2007, when Spurs/Jazz Game 3 on ABC drew 4.7 million and Pistons/Cavaliers Game 3 on TNT drew 4.4 million. The four-game Spurs/Grizzlies Western Conference Finals averaged a 3.1 U.S. rating on ESPN and ABC, down 50% from Heat/Celtics last year (6.2), down 28% from Mavericks/Thunder in 2011 (4.3), and the lowest rated NBA conference final since Spurs/Jazz in 2007 (2.8). Last year's Thunder/Spurs WCF on TNT averaged a 5.0 U.S. rating. The last four-game sweep in the Conference Finals — Nets/Pistons in 2003 — also averaged a 3.1 rating on ESPN/ABC. (Series average from ESPN, additional information from TV By the Numbers) 大意： 這篇報導主要是說，今年西區冠軍賽整體收視率幾乎是呈現大倒退的跡象， 以第四戰為例，比去年ESPN轉播的東冠G4，下跌幅度達53％；而也比去年的 西冠G4下滑了20％左右。 （而如果跟前年也是ESPN轉播的的西冠決賽相比則是下滑30％） 不過G4也是這系列戰全美總收視人口唯一一場突破五百萬人次的。 至於G3的收視（這是美國週末時段）人口只有490萬，分別比去年跟前年同 樣由ESPN轉播的分區決賽G3下降35％和20％。至於和去年TNT轉播的西冠相 比也是下滑31％。（這都是2007年以來的新低） 最後提到了今年西冠決賽整體收視率指數是3.1，比起去年的東冠決賽6.2， 整整下滑了50％；另外ESPN前年轉播西冠是4.3，TNT去年西冠則是5.0。 （不過還贏2007年西冠決賽的2.8就是了） P.S：至於上一個Sweep的分區決賽，恰巧也是ESPN所播，03年的籃網跟活塞， 收視率也是3.1。 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 218.173.173.209
推
05/30 11:13, , 1F
so西冠要打七場就對了 把錢賺回來
05/30 11:13, 1F
→
05/30 11:14, , 2F
東
05/30 11:14, 2F
推
05/30 11:14, , 3F
收視毒藥：馬刺
05/30 11:14, 3F
→
05/30 11:14, , 4F
意外嗎 兩隊票房毒藥對決...
05/30 11:14, 4F
→
05/30 11:15, , 5F
光頭王:只好讓我來邊BB邊跳舞救場...
05/30 11:15, 5F
→
05/30 11:15, , 6F
沒辦法乾兒子兩個都放假只剩最後血脈熱火
05/30 11:15, 6F
推
05/30 11:17, , 7F
如果Finals是馬刺跟溜馬 收視率會比這還低嗎?
05/30 11:17, 7F
推
05/30 11:17, , 8F
都已經3:0了第四戰還會有人看嗎= =
05/30 11:17, 8F
推
05/30 11:21, , 9F
去年西冠也有馬刺阿........
05/30 11:21, 9F
推
05/30 11:23, , 10F
都怪馬刺把人家4:0.....
05/30 11:23, 10F
推
05/30 11:23, , 11F
結論: 雷刺>雷牛>熊刺 所以西區收視保證應該是
05/30 11:23, 11F
→
05/30 11:24, , 12F
湖雷...
05/30 11:24, 12F
推
05/30 11:24, , 13F
史騰應該再度開罰馬刺?
05/30 11:24, 13F
推
05/30 11:24, , 14F
去年打的比較激烈,不像今年一面倒
05/30 11:24, 14F
推
05/30 11:25, , 15F
曼菲斯跟聖安東尼奧兩個小城對決本來收視率都會低
05/30 11:25, 15F
→
05/30 11:26, , 16F
更何況兩隊又沒有全國性的球星
05/30 11:26, 16F
推
05/30 11:26, , 17F
所以是馬刺太強的錯嗎 收視率怪他們囉
05/30 11:26, 17F
推
05/30 11:27, , 18F
馬刺超壞 第一輪打湖人也是橫掃 準備被罰款吧(誤
05/30 11:27, 18F
推
05/30 11:27, , 19F
當然怪馬刺啊 不然呢
05/30 11:27, 19F
推
05/30 11:27, , 20F
小城不是重點吧 OK市比那兩個城市都小吧...
05/30 11:27, 20F
→
05/30 11:27, , 21F
如果東區是溜馬出線...總冠軍賽收視率應該慘到不能看
05/30 11:27, 21F
→
05/30 11:28, , 22F
有幾年總冠軍賽都是湖人對籃網，收視率就是...
05/30 11:28, 22F
推
05/30 11:29, , 23F
馬馬配 是所有組合中 支持度最低的
05/30 11:29, 23F
推
05/30 11:30, , 24F
很名顯是灰熊的問題
05/30 11:30, 24F
推
05/30 11:33, , 25F
收視率低，電視台要哭哭了
05/30 11:33, 25F
→
05/30 11:34, , 26F
老實說以上資料看不出馬刺的問題 只得出雷>>>熊的結
05/30 11:34, 26F
推
05/30 11:34, , 27F
沒人想看的比賽你再強也沒用
05/30 11:34, 27F
→
05/30 11:35, , 28F
既然都沒人看了誰還會在意什麼橫不橫掃啊XDXD
05/30 11:35, 28F
推
05/30 11:36, , 29F
TD不退休 馬刺給人的印象就是無聊 不會吸引人去看
05/30 11:36, 29F
→
05/30 11:36, , 30F
即便事實不是如此
05/30 11:36, 30F
推
05/30 11:37, , 31F
沒有老大今年我根本連打開電視機都懶(哈欠)
05/30 11:37, 31F
推
05/30 11:38, , 32F
馬+馬=毒瘤
05/30 11:38, 32F
推
05/30 11:38, , 33F
不意外 票房毒藥馬刺 自盡吧
05/30 11:38, 33F
推
05/30 11:39, , 34F
馬刺對活賽打到第七場 但收視也沒多好啊
05/30 11:39, 34F
→
05/30 11:42, , 35F
湖人被橫掃了阿 一堆彌彌都不看惹
05/30 11:42, 35F
推
05/30 11:48, , 36F
看馬刺打球 真的很無聊~~~
05/30 11:48, 36F
噓
05/30 11:49, , 37F
dixie大,"有幾年總冠軍都是"??哪裡都是??也才一次...
05/30 11:49, 37F
推
05/30 11:49, , 38F
如果去年不出手讓馬刺掃掉 今年也不會差那麼多
05/30 11:49, 38F
→
05/30 11:49, , 39F
溜馬打馬刺 聯盟會哭吧
05/30 11:49, 39F
→
05/30 11:53, , 40F
會嗎 還蠻好看的ㄚ
05/30 11:53, 40F
→
05/30 11:54, , 41F
看馬刺打球真的很無趣 強雖強但就是很難看
05/30 11:54, 41F
推
05/30 11:54, , 42F
收視率跟比賽精采度不一定成正比
05/30 11:54, 42F
推
05/30 12:02, , 43F
畢竟看的懂團隊籃球的仍是少數
05/30 12:02, 43F
→
05/30 12:02, , 44F
大部份仍是追球刺激與爽度
05/30 12:02, 44F
推
05/30 12:04, , 45F
看的懂跟想看是兩回事吧 就像女職撞收視比較好
05/30 12:04, 45F
推
05/30 12:04, , 46F
又要拍出三少加持東區了
05/30 12:04, 46F
→
05/30 12:06, , 47F
我比較不懂喊啥"沒XX我根本懶得看" 然後跑來NBA板是
05/30 12:06, 47F
→
05/30 12:06, , 48F
要幹嘛?
05/30 12:06, 48F
推
05/30 12:07, , 49F
觀眾大概覺得馬刺的空位投籃機會出的太多太容易了吧w
05/30 12:07, 49F
→
05/30 12:08, , 50F
爽 NBA衰退吧
05/30 12:08, 50F
推
05/30 12:14, , 51F
史藤:拉棒加油阿 我就靠你賺7場門票了 LBJ:....
05/30 12:14, 51F
推
05/30 12:14, , 52F
馬刺表示：怪我囉？
05/30 12:14, 52F
推
05/30 12:17, , 53F
廢話 沒人要看髒刺黑刺打球阿 一看就電視螢幕都黑掉
05/30 12:17, 53F
推
05/30 12:18, , 54F
在罵下去新總管明年又要硬推雷霆vs湖人了
05/30 12:18, 54F
推
05/30 12:18, , 55F
強就是好看...傻哦
05/30 12:18, 55F
推
05/30 12:19, , 56F
馬刺好
05/30 12:19, 56F
推
05/30 12:20, , 57F
吹好笑的哨還想不離不棄 美國人才不來這套
05/30 12:20, 57F
推
05/30 12:20, , 58F
年輕人跟他們打球一樣 只愛看自幹不愛看團隊籃球
05/30 12:20, 58F
→
05/30 12:21, , 59F
還是要靠老大高難度出手才是票房保證 馬刺只會嚇跑人
05/30 12:21, 59F
推
05/30 12:27, , 60F
懶得開電視跟懶得開 PTT 是不一樣的，這很好懂吧XDD
05/30 12:27, 60F
→
05/30 12:29, , 61F
橫掃收視率低可以想見!2007也是橫掃
05/30 12:29, 61F
推
05/30 12:40, , 62F
可是去年西冠也有馬刺啊
05/30 12:40, 62F
推
05/30 12:45, , 63F
想看就看..一直討論收視率也沒啥意義= =
05/30 12:45, 63F
推
05/30 13:12, , 64F
不想看就不要看 自己球隊爛 打不贏不要在那邊該
05/30 13:12, 64F
推
05/30 13:27, , 65F
很多人不想看什麼都喜歡昭告天下，以為大家想知道
05/30 13:27, 65F
→
05/30 13:27, , 66F
也不只有NBA版是這樣
05/30 13:27, 66F
推
05/30 13:30, , 67F
所以東區要多打幾場賺回廣告？
05/30 13:30, 67F
推
05/30 13:32, , 68F
所以聯盟才會下令把東冠拖到第七場
05/30 13:32, 68F
推
05/30 13:38, , 69F
乾脆訂灌籃就得十分好了，這樣應該蠻好看
05/30 13:38, 69F
推
05/30 13:48, , 70F
沒湖人真的懶得看，勉強看一下火馬看火火會不會被翻
05/30 13:48, 70F
→
05/30 13:49, , 71F
緯來播東冠算賺到了
05/30 13:49, 71F
→
05/30 13:54, , 72F
所以重罰馬刺50000鎂
05/30 13:54, 72F
噓
05/30 14:01, , 73F
不然季後賽改明星季後賽好了，收視率到XX的球隊參加
05/30 14:01, 73F
推
05/30 14:09, , 74F
我不是什麼迷,團隊籃球好看就好.
05/30 14:09, 74F
→
05/30 14:50, , 75F
都是小市場在拼不意外阿
05/30 14:50, 75F
推
05/30 15:26, , 76F
我一個死忠的馬刺迷朋友G4都寧願早起看小說 都不看G4
05/30 15:26, 76F
推
05/30 15:28, , 77F
收視率差不意外
05/30 15:28, 77F
→
05/30 15:29, , 78F
馬刺迷朋友G4都寧願早起看小說 都不看G4 XD
05/30 15:29, 78F
推
05/30 15:52, , 79F
finals湖人vs籃網只有一年而已吧
05/30 15:52, 79F
噓
05/30 16:46, , 80F
人家是打冠軍又不是打好看，打好看不會去看哈林籃球
05/30 16:46, 80F
→
05/30 16:55, , 81F
就只是星度不足，熱火比賽也沒多好看
05/30 16:55, 81F
推
05/30 21:01, , 82F
明明就是因為灰熊弱得沒有招架之力啊~
05/30 21:01, 82F
推
05/30 23:14, , 83F
看國外大多認為G4故意讓溜馬贏 好彌補馬刺4:0的空檔
05/30 23:14, 83F
→
05/31 11:23, , 84F
果然不意外熱火聽牌
05/31 11:23, 84F
‣ 更多 krajicek 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1HfiEQzN (NBA)