[討論] KD失去西河後的表現已回收
KD失去西河以後的消息剛出來,
我本來的想法是:
恐怕與總冠軍無緣了。但是未來幾輪的比賽,正是KD證明自己的好機會。
而KD的表現卻讓人不禁失望。沒有辦法獨立帶著打贏任何一系列。
今年的球季也到此為止。
過去大家在排序的時候,版上比較多人認同的順序是
LBJ>KD>甜瓜 目前三強小前鋒。
但是失去西河後的雷霆,就像是一隻很一般的一人輸出球隊。
隊比賽的主宰力似乎就這樣銳減了好多好多。
影響力似乎就像Irving那樣了。
有天份、有實力。但並沒有偉大到可以這麼熱烈的被討論,這麼強勢的影響聯盟。
西河受傷,好像反而是證明了西河的時機了。
總覺得很可惜。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 163.25.118.250
推
05/16 13:00, , 1F
05/16 13:00, 1F
推
05/16 13:01, , 2F
05/16 13:01, 2F
→
05/16 13:01, , 3F
05/16 13:01, 3F
推
05/16 13:01, , 4F
05/16 13:01, 4F
→
05/16 13:01, , 5F
05/16 13:01, 5F
推
05/16 13:01, , 6F
05/16 13:01, 6F
推
05/16 13:01, , 7F
05/16 13:01, 7F
推
05/16 13:01, , 8F
05/16 13:01, 8F
推
05/16 13:01, , 9F
05/16 13:01, 9F
→
05/16 13:01, , 10F
05/16 13:01, 10F
→
05/16 13:02, , 11F
05/16 13:02, 11F
推
05/16 13:02, , 12F
05/16 13:02, 12F
推
05/16 13:02, , 13F
05/16 13:02, 13F
→
05/16 13:02, , 14F
05/16 13:02, 14F
→
05/16 13:03, , 15F
05/16 13:03, 15F
推
05/16 13:03, , 16F
05/16 13:03, 16F
→
05/16 13:03, , 17F
05/16 13:03, 17F
跟LBJ比當然是比不過的。
只是本來想說,他可以證明自己是聯盟第二人。
但是這樣的表現。似乎對比賽的影響力,大概就是跟全明星隊的眾球星同一水準。
並沒有足以被稱為聯盟第二。只能說是強者之林?
※ 編輯: PPTplayer 來自: 163.25.118.250 (05/16 13:04)
推
05/16 13:03, , 18F
05/16 13:03, 18F
→
05/16 13:03, , 19F
05/16 13:03, 19F
推
05/16 13:03, , 20F
05/16 13:03, 20F
推
05/16 13:04, , 21F
05/16 13:04, 21F
推
05/16 13:04, , 22F
05/16 13:04, 22F
→
05/16 13:05, , 23F
05/16 13:05, 23F
→
05/16 13:05, , 24F
05/16 13:05, 24F
→
05/16 13:05, , 25F
05/16 13:05, 25F
→
05/16 13:05, , 26F
05/16 13:05, 26F
推
05/16 13:05, , 27F
05/16 13:05, 27F
→
05/16 13:05, , 28F
05/16 13:05, 28F
推
05/16 13:05, , 29F
05/16 13:05, 29F
→
05/16 13:06, , 30F
05/16 13:06, 30F
推
05/16 13:06, , 31F
05/16 13:06, 31F
→
05/16 13:06, , 32F
05/16 13:06, 32F
→
05/16 13:06, , 33F
05/16 13:06, 33F
推
05/16 13:06, , 34F
05/16 13:06, 34F
→
05/16 13:06, , 35F
05/16 13:06, 35F
推
05/16 13:06, , 36F
05/16 13:06, 36F
→
05/16 13:07, , 37F
05/16 13:07, 37F
推
05/16 13:07, , 38F
05/16 13:07, 38F
還有 107 則推文
→
05/16 13:53, , 146F
05/16 13:53, 146F
噓
05/16 13:53, , 147F
05/16 13:53, 147F
→
05/16 13:57, , 148F
05/16 13:57, 148F
噓
05/16 13:59, , 149F
05/16 13:59, 149F
→
05/16 13:59, , 150F
05/16 13:59, 150F
→
05/16 13:59, , 151F
05/16 13:59, 151F
推
05/16 14:02, , 152F
05/16 14:02, 152F
推
05/16 14:09, , 153F
05/16 14:09, 153F
噓
05/16 14:21, , 154F
05/16 14:21, 154F
→
05/16 14:22, , 155F
05/16 14:22, 155F
推
05/16 14:26, , 156F
05/16 14:26, 156F
推
05/16 14:26, , 157F
05/16 14:26, 157F
→
05/16 14:26, , 158F
05/16 14:26, 158F
推
05/16 14:32, , 159F
05/16 14:32, 159F
→
05/16 14:32, , 160F
05/16 14:32, 160F
推
05/16 14:37, , 161F
05/16 14:37, 161F
→
05/16 14:39, , 162F
05/16 14:39, 162F
→
05/16 14:44, , 163F
05/16 14:44, 163F
噓
05/16 14:48, , 164F
05/16 14:48, 164F
推
05/16 14:51, , 165F
05/16 14:51, 165F
推
05/16 15:08, , 166F
05/16 15:08, 166F
推
05/16 15:11, , 167F
05/16 15:11, 167F
→
05/16 15:12, , 168F
05/16 15:12, 168F
推
05/16 15:17, , 169F
05/16 15:17, 169F
推
05/16 15:29, , 170F
05/16 15:29, 170F
→
05/16 15:29, , 171F
05/16 15:29, 171F
→
05/16 15:32, , 172F
05/16 15:32, 172F
→
05/16 15:35, , 173F
05/16 15:35, 173F
推
05/16 15:38, , 174F
05/16 15:38, 174F
→
05/16 15:39, , 175F
05/16 15:39, 175F
→
05/16 15:40, , 176F
05/16 15:40, 176F
推
05/16 16:06, , 177F
05/16 16:06, 177F
→
05/16 16:34, , 178F
05/16 16:34, 178F
推
05/16 19:30, , 179F
05/16 19:30, 179F
推
05/16 20:03, , 180F
05/16 20:03, 180F
→
05/16 20:04, , 181F
05/16 20:04, 181F
推
05/16 21:26, , 182F
05/16 21:26, 182F
推
05/16 22:34, , 183F
05/16 22:34, 183F
→
05/16 23:43, , 184F
05/16 23:43, 184F
推
05/17 13:03, , 185F
05/17 13:03, 185F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):
討論
71
185