[討論] 不具名與JR Smith已回收
根據鍵盤科南,也就是我,的研究 不具名這個梗出自 7740 #1GpdmPe1
7440 6012/17 aaahahaha □ [新聞] 豪小子回娘家 尼克諸將請球迷為他鼓掌
另一位不具名球員則說:「我們不是在談林書豪,當有人提到火箭隊時,我們通常想到的
是James Harden。」
http://0rz.tw/FSPWf ESPN原文
Said one player: "We don't really talk about him. Whenever someone talks
about the Rockets, we usually talk about Harden."
該天尼克陣容如下
R.Brewer
Copeland
Felton
Chandler
Kidd
JR
Novak
K.Thomas
Prigioni
Melo
Camby
Rasheed
J.White
其中Felton, Chandler, Novak都在該篇文章中具名,除去這三位
因此不具名的球員可能是九位中的一位,在無法證明是否是JR的情況下
我認為是JR的可能性相當低,我們看看JR過去的發言
1.直指林的合約會造成休息室問題
2.直說Felton比林更會傳球更無私
3.http://0rz.tw/Wa5ZA 對一群小朋友說要kick 林的ass
4.http://0rz.tw/jbWN8 拿教練的眼神開玩笑
5.在網路上公開向少女約砲
6.直說Bayless有矮個子情結
7.直接用Who?嗆Jason Terry
8.http://0rz.tw/lThde 到Harden Twitter去嗆他被ankle break
這裡可以看出他是一個不在乎人家想法也不懼怕嗆聲的人
而我們再看回原句
另一位不具名球員則說:「我們不是在談林書豪,當有人提到火箭隊時,我們通常想到的
是James Harden。」
Said one player: "We don't really talk about him. Whenever someone talks
about the Rockets, we usually talk about Harden."
這句不但溫和,且就事實上也完全說得通,並不像是JR會說的話
再論他會尊重James Harden的機率...相當的低
就我猜測,這位不具名球員是一名頭腦清楚、和林沒有什麼瓜葛、低調行事的人
依科南我的想法,Brewer或Kidd是不具名的機率要比JR高上許多。
各位覺得呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.45.11.120
→
05/12 14:46, , 1F
05/12 14:46, 1F
→
05/12 14:47, , 2F
05/12 14:47, 2F
→
05/12 14:47, , 3F
05/12 14:47, 3F
→
05/12 14:47, , 4F
05/12 14:47, 4F
推
05/12 14:48, , 5F
05/12 14:48, 5F
推
05/12 14:48, , 6F
05/12 14:48, 6F
→
05/12 14:49, , 7F
05/12 14:49, 7F
→
05/12 14:49, , 8F
05/12 14:49, 8F
→
05/12 14:49, , 9F
05/12 14:49, 9F
推
05/12 14:51, , 10F
05/12 14:51, 10F
推
05/12 14:53, , 11F
05/12 14:53, 11F
→
05/12 14:53, , 12F
05/12 14:53, 12F
→
05/12 14:57, , 13F
05/12 14:57, 13F
推
05/12 14:58, , 14F
05/12 14:58, 14F
→
05/12 15:00, , 15F
05/12 15:00, 15F
推
05/12 15:01, , 16F
05/12 15:01, 16F
推
05/12 15:06, , 17F
05/12 15:06, 17F
推
05/12 15:06, , 18F
05/12 15:06, 18F
推
05/12 15:11, , 19F
05/12 15:11, 19F
→
05/12 15:11, , 20F
05/12 15:11, 20F
推
05/12 15:15, , 21F
05/12 15:15, 21F
→
05/12 15:16, , 22F
05/12 15:16, 22F
推
05/12 15:17, , 23F
05/12 15:17, 23F
→
05/12 15:20, , 24F
05/12 15:20, 24F
推
05/12 15:26, , 25F
05/12 15:26, 25F
推
05/12 15:44, , 26F
05/12 15:44, 26F
推
05/12 15:45, , 27F
05/12 15:45, 27F
→
05/12 15:45, , 28F
05/12 15:45, 28F
推
05/12 15:46, , 29F
05/12 15:46, 29F
→
05/12 15:46, , 30F
05/12 15:46, 30F
推
05/12 15:47, , 31F
05/12 15:47, 31F
推
05/12 15:56, , 32F
05/12 15:56, 32F
推
05/12 15:58, , 33F
05/12 15:58, 33F
→
05/12 15:58, , 34F
05/12 15:58, 34F
→
05/12 16:00, , 35F
05/12 16:00, 35F
→
05/12 16:01, , 36F
05/12 16:01, 36F
推
05/12 16:08, , 37F
05/12 16:08, 37F
→
05/12 16:09, , 38F
05/12 16:09, 38F
推
05/12 16:10, , 39F
05/12 16:10, 39F
→
05/12 16:10, , 40F
05/12 16:10, 40F
推
05/12 16:17, , 41F
05/12 16:17, 41F
→
05/12 16:22, , 42F
05/12 16:22, 42F
→
05/12 16:28, , 43F
05/12 16:28, 43F
→
05/12 16:34, , 44F
05/12 16:34, 44F
→
05/12 16:42, , 45F
05/12 16:42, 45F
→
05/12 16:42, , 46F
05/12 16:42, 46F
→
05/12 16:49, , 47F
05/12 16:49, 47F
噓
05/12 17:08, , 48F
05/12 17:08, 48F
推
05/12 17:15, , 49F
05/12 17:15, 49F
→
05/12 17:24, , 50F
05/12 17:24, 50F
→
05/12 18:12, , 51F
05/12 18:12, 51F
→
05/12 18:13, , 52F
05/12 18:13, 52F
→
05/12 18:13, , 53F
05/12 18:13, 53F
→
05/12 18:15, , 54F
05/12 18:15, 54F
推
05/12 18:38, , 55F
05/12 18:38, 55F
噓
05/12 20:12, , 56F
05/12 20:12, 56F
噓
05/12 22:00, , 57F
05/12 22:00, 57F
噓
05/13 00:48, , 58F
05/13 00:48, 58F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):
討論
19
58