Re: [討論]未來幾年MVP誰能搶贏LBJ?已回收
感覺原PO多慮了
對照賈霸
Age
1970-71 NBA MVP 23
1971-72 NBA MVP 24
1973-74 NBA MVP 26
1975-76 NBA MVP 28 有沒有感覺跟LBJ很相似?
1976-77 NBA MVP 29
---------------------------------
1979-80 NBA MVP 32
之後就沒了
連賈霸這種拿MVP的怪物
29歲拿完後也過了三年才又拿到
30歲那年不知為何只上62場就不算了
但31歲(當年MVP Moses Malone 24.8/17.6/1.8 )
跟33歲(當年MVP Julius Erving 24.6/8.0/4.4)
數據也是很猛,可是也沒拿到。
這代表在NBA,你只要拿很多次MVP了,接下來對你的標準就提高
就算球隊戰績差不多,只要得分籃板助攻少人家幾個(ex. 當年Moses Malone)
或是得分籃板助攻跟人家差不多,但球隊戰績差個幾勝(ex. 當年Julius Erving)
就拿不到MVP了,如果把各隊化學作用導致戰績爆衝考慮進去,變數可是很大,
如此你還認為MVP很容易拿?
※ 引述《godiegroup (力挺豪神)》之銘言:
: LBJ已經拿下第4座MVP了(追平張真人 Wilt Chamberlain)
: 以LBJ的打法跟鋼鐵身體
: 不知道是LBJ強過頭 還是其他球星不夠強
: 感覺未來幾年能威脅他mvp連霸的幾乎不存在吧?
: LBJ只要身體健康 接著幾年很可能發生 LBJMVP 6-8連霸
: 名人堂的偉大球星也沒他拿mvp如喝水般簡單?
: Jabbar一生拿過6座mvp
: Jordan跟 Bill Russell一生都拿過5座mvp
: 但這些記錄很快將被LBJ打破
: 大家覺得目前聯盟中的球星 未來幾年到底有誰能打敗LBJ拿下MVP?
: 1 KD
: 只會得分,西河不在,球隊只能險勝老8
: 沒MVP得能力
: 2 Kobe
: 傷勢跟球隊戰績因素 未來能否100%復原是問題?
: 3 CP3
: 快艇除非拿下聯盟第一或西區第一
: 4 Melo
: 尼克跟今年戰績暴衝變東區第2 甜瓜得分大增 都拿不到MVP了
: 除非尼克戰績變聯盟第一 不然不太可能拿到?
: 5待版友補充
: 謝謝
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 123.192.39.186
推
05/05 00:12, , 1F
05/05 00:12, 1F
推
05/05 00:13, , 2F
05/05 00:13, 2F
→
05/05 00:13, , 3F
05/05 00:13, 3F
推
05/05 00:13, , 4F
05/05 00:13, 4F
→
05/05 00:14, , 5F
05/05 00:14, 5F
推
05/05 00:14, , 6F
05/05 00:14, 6F
→
05/05 00:14, , 7F
05/05 00:14, 7F
→
05/05 00:15, , 8F
05/05 00:15, 8F
→
05/05 00:16, , 9F
05/05 00:16, 9F
推
05/05 00:16, , 10F
05/05 00:16, 10F
→
05/05 00:17, , 11F
05/05 00:17, 11F
→
05/05 00:17, , 12F
05/05 00:17, 12F
推
05/05 00:17, , 13F
05/05 00:17, 13F
→
05/05 00:18, , 14F
05/05 00:18, 14F
→
05/05 00:19, , 15F
05/05 00:19, 15F
推
05/05 00:19, , 16F
05/05 00:19, 16F
→
05/05 00:19, , 17F
05/05 00:19, 17F
→
05/05 00:19, , 18F
05/05 00:19, 18F
→
05/05 00:20, , 19F
05/05 00:20, 19F
推
05/05 00:20, , 20F
05/05 00:20, 20F
→
05/05 00:20, , 21F
05/05 00:20, 21F
→
05/05 00:20, , 22F
05/05 00:20, 22F
推
05/05 00:20, , 23F
05/05 00:20, 23F
推
05/05 00:23, , 24F
05/05 00:23, 24F
推
05/05 00:23, , 25F
05/05 00:23, 25F
→
05/05 00:23, , 26F
05/05 00:23, 26F
推
05/05 00:23, , 27F
05/05 00:23, 27F
→
05/05 00:24, , 28F
05/05 00:24, 28F
推
05/05 00:25, , 29F
05/05 00:25, 29F
推
05/05 00:25, , 30F
05/05 00:25, 30F
→
05/05 00:25, , 31F
05/05 00:25, 31F
→
05/05 00:25, , 32F
05/05 00:25, 32F
→
05/05 00:25, , 33F
05/05 00:25, 33F
→
05/05 00:26, , 34F
05/05 00:26, 34F
推
05/05 00:27, , 35F
05/05 00:27, 35F
推
05/05 00:27, , 36F
05/05 00:27, 36F
推
05/05 00:28, , 37F
05/05 00:28, 37F
→
05/05 00:28, , 38F
05/05 00:28, 38F
→
05/05 00:29, , 39F
05/05 00:29, 39F
還有 40 則推文
→
05/05 01:21, , 80F
05/05 01:21, 80F
→
05/05 01:21, , 81F
05/05 01:21, 81F
推
05/05 01:21, , 82F
05/05 01:21, 82F
推
05/05 01:22, , 83F
05/05 01:22, 83F
→
05/05 01:22, , 84F
05/05 01:22, 84F
推
05/05 01:31, , 85F
05/05 01:31, 85F
推
05/05 01:35, , 86F
05/05 01:35, 86F
→
05/05 01:35, , 87F
05/05 01:35, 87F
推
05/05 01:37, , 88F
05/05 01:37, 88F
推
05/05 01:39, , 89F
05/05 01:39, 89F
推
05/05 01:42, , 90F
05/05 01:42, 90F
→
05/05 01:42, , 91F
05/05 01:42, 91F
推
05/05 01:47, , 92F
05/05 01:47, 92F
→
05/05 01:48, , 93F
05/05 01:48, 93F
→
05/05 01:48, , 94F
05/05 01:48, 94F
→
05/05 01:48, , 95F
05/05 01:48, 95F
→
05/05 01:49, , 96F
05/05 01:49, 96F
→
05/05 01:49, , 97F
05/05 01:49, 97F
→
05/05 01:50, , 98F
05/05 01:50, 98F
→
05/05 01:51, , 99F
05/05 01:51, 99F
→
05/05 01:52, , 100F
05/05 01:52, 100F
推
05/05 01:57, , 101F
05/05 01:57, 101F
推
05/05 02:00, , 102F
05/05 02:00, 102F
→
05/05 02:01, , 103F
05/05 02:01, 103F
→
05/05 02:02, , 104F
05/05 02:02, 104F
推
05/05 03:17, , 105F
05/05 03:17, 105F
推
05/05 13:26, , 106F
05/05 13:26, 106F
→
05/05 14:04, , 107F
05/05 14:04, 107F
→
05/05 14:04, , 108F
05/05 14:04, 108F
→
05/05 14:04, , 109F
05/05 14:04, 109F
→
05/05 14:05, , 110F
05/05 14:05, 110F
噓
05/05 14:11, , 111F
05/05 14:11, 111F
→
05/05 14:12, , 112F
05/05 14:12, 112F
噓
05/05 14:28, , 113F
05/05 14:28, 113F
推
05/05 15:20, , 114F
05/05 15:20, 114F
噓
05/05 15:56, , 115F
05/05 15:56, 115F
→
05/05 15:56, , 116F
05/05 15:56, 116F
推
05/05 16:33, , 117F
05/05 16:33, 117F
推
05/07 22:13, , 118F
05/07 22:13, 118F
推
05/08 21:55, , 119F
05/08 21:55, 119F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):
討論
77
163