Re: [討論] LIN明年有可能拿去換NASH嗎?已回收
※ 引述《j791126x (請給我黃金)》之銘言:
: 看了一下薪資表 發現NASH跟LIN價格接近
: 湖人又要重建 火箭有哈登了 搞不好會需要一個定點射手PG
: 火箭會不會拿Lin去換NASH?????????????????
: 剛五摳寧????
: NASH唯一缺限就是太老 跑不太動
: 但是小貝好像也可以頂替補
: 不過有三分
: 各位覺得???
可能性不是沒有
雖然Lin季後賽打很差
但是他有票房又年輕又有中國市場加持
加上Kobe不知何時會復出
Lin這兩季 季賽打的都不錯
雖然季後賽因傷勢表現不好
但季賽的表現不輸給明星後衛太多
在Kobe復出前 說不定能再打出新的一陣林來瘋
這樣湖人就能跟上個賽季林來瘋時期的尼克一樣狂賺錢
因為莫雷肖想湖人的嘎獸
莫雷是個球員皆可交易的總管
例如:battier T-mac
連火箭上賽季原本的核心小馬丁,都肯交易出去了
湖人總管Mitch在交易上可是強者
跟Mitch交易不要想賺,只求不虧
你想要嘎獸 當然得丟人來換
從冰箱的調度來看
火箭現在是以哈登為核心的球隊
再加上一直有Lin被交易的傳聞
如果火箭想要嘎獸
Omer Asik跟Lin+高富帥很可能被打包出去
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.169.234.101
推
05/04 14:16, , 1F
05/04 14:16, 1F
推
05/04 14:17, , 2F
05/04 14:17, 2F
推
05/04 14:18, , 3F
05/04 14:18, 3F
→
05/04 14:18, , 4F
05/04 14:18, 4F
推
05/04 14:18, , 5F
05/04 14:18, 5F
推
05/04 14:18, , 6F
05/04 14:18, 6F
→
05/04 14:18, , 7F
05/04 14:18, 7F
推
05/04 14:19, , 8F
05/04 14:19, 8F
→
05/04 14:19, , 9F
05/04 14:19, 9F
推
05/04 14:19, , 10F
05/04 14:19, 10F
→
05/04 14:19, , 11F
05/04 14:19, 11F
推
05/04 14:19, , 12F
05/04 14:19, 12F
推
05/04 14:20, , 13F
05/04 14:20, 13F
→
05/04 14:20, , 14F
05/04 14:20, 14F
推
05/04 14:20, , 15F
05/04 14:20, 15F
→
05/04 14:20, , 16F
05/04 14:20, 16F
→
05/04 14:20, , 17F
05/04 14:20, 17F
→
05/04 14:20, , 18F
05/04 14:20, 18F
→
05/04 14:21, , 19F
05/04 14:21, 19F
→
05/04 14:21, , 20F
05/04 14:21, 20F
→
05/04 14:21, , 21F
05/04 14:21, 21F
推
05/04 14:21, , 22F
05/04 14:21, 22F
→
05/04 14:21, , 23F
05/04 14:21, 23F
推
05/04 14:22, , 24F
05/04 14:22, 24F
→
05/04 14:22, , 25F
05/04 14:22, 25F
推
05/04 14:22, , 26F
05/04 14:22, 26F
→
05/04 14:22, , 27F
05/04 14:22, 27F
→
05/04 14:22, , 28F
05/04 14:22, 28F
→
05/04 14:22, , 29F
05/04 14:22, 29F
→
05/04 14:22, , 30F
05/04 14:22, 30F
→
05/04 14:22, , 31F
05/04 14:22, 31F
推
05/04 14:23, , 32F
05/04 14:23, 32F
→
05/04 14:23, , 33F
05/04 14:23, 33F
→
05/04 14:23, , 34F
05/04 14:23, 34F
→
05/04 14:23, , 35F
05/04 14:23, 35F
推
05/04 14:24, , 36F
05/04 14:24, 36F
推
05/04 14:24, , 37F
05/04 14:24, 37F
推
05/04 14:24, , 38F
05/04 14:24, 38F
→
05/04 14:24, , 39F
05/04 14:24, 39F
→
05/04 14:24, , 40F
05/04 14:24, 40F
→
05/04 14:24, , 41F
05/04 14:24, 41F
→
05/04 14:25, , 42F
05/04 14:25, 42F
噓
05/04 14:25, , 43F
05/04 14:25, 43F
推
05/04 14:25, , 44F
05/04 14:25, 44F
→
05/04 14:25, , 45F
05/04 14:25, 45F
→
05/04 14:26, , 46F
05/04 14:26, 46F
推
05/04 14:26, , 47F
05/04 14:26, 47F
→
05/04 14:26, , 48F
05/04 14:26, 48F
推
05/04 14:26, , 49F
05/04 14:26, 49F
→
05/04 14:27, , 50F
05/04 14:27, 50F
→
05/04 14:28, , 51F
05/04 14:28, 51F
→
05/04 14:29, , 52F
05/04 14:29, 52F
→
05/04 14:35, , 53F
05/04 14:35, 53F
→
05/04 14:37, , 54F
05/04 14:37, 54F
噓
05/04 15:08, , 55F
05/04 15:08, 55F
推
05/04 15:10, , 56F
05/04 15:10, 56F
推
05/04 15:14, , 57F
05/04 15:14, 57F
→
05/04 15:21, , 58F
05/04 15:21, 58F
推
05/04 15:28, , 59F
05/04 15:28, 59F
→
05/04 15:29, , 60F
05/04 15:29, 60F
推
05/04 16:29, , 61F
05/04 16:29, 61F
噓
05/04 21:41, , 62F
05/04 21:41, 62F
→
05/05 23:05, , 63F
05/05 23:05, 63F
→
05/06 22:25, , 64F
05/06 22:25, 64F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 4 篇):