Re: [討論] 林書豪真的是豪神嗎?已回收
某些人:沒有rondo 老賽更強
某些人:沒有西河守住KD KD要解放了
某些人:沒有Lin 火箭要起飛了
真的是很奇怪的邏輯
打個幾場球賽就可解釋沒有誰比較好
之前鬍子不再兩場火箭大勝 也有再說沒有鬍子火箭要起飛了
照戰績二分法的結果論 沒有鬍子跟Lin 火箭就完全起飛成西區第一了吧
沒有rondo 老賽的後場非常虛弱
沒有西河 KD一個人獨木難撐
沒有Lin 頂多就是火箭影響沒有那麼大 還打得下去
因為火箭這季後場的板凳實力不錯 SG的鬍子也還在
特別是比佛利 CP值很高
但是少了Lin真的沒差嗎? 肯定有差
拜託不要再整天發結果論了
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.42.11.118
噓
05/02 12:46, , 1F
05/02 12:46, 1F
打錯 謝謝提醒
推
05/02 12:46, , 2F
05/02 12:46, 2F
→
05/02 12:46, , 3F
05/02 12:46, 3F
推
05/02 12:47, , 4F
05/02 12:47, 4F
※ 編輯: ghghfftjack 來自: 114.42.11.118 (05/02 12:47)
推
05/02 12:47, , 5F
05/02 12:47, 5F
→
05/02 12:47, , 6F
05/02 12:47, 6F
→
05/02 12:47, , 7F
05/02 12:47, 7F
推
05/02 12:47, , 8F
05/02 12:47, 8F
噓
05/02 12:47, , 9F
05/02 12:47, 9F
推
05/02 12:47, , 10F
05/02 12:47, 10F
→
05/02 12:47, , 11F
05/02 12:47, 11F
噓
05/02 12:47, , 12F
05/02 12:47, 12F
推
05/02 12:47, , 13F
05/02 12:47, 13F
噓
05/02 12:47, , 14F
05/02 12:47, 14F
→
05/02 12:47, , 15F
05/02 12:47, 15F
→
05/02 12:47, , 16F
05/02 12:47, 16F
噓
05/02 12:48, , 17F
05/02 12:48, 17F
→
05/02 12:48, , 18F
05/02 12:48, 18F
同樣的講法阿
※ 編輯: ghghfftjack 來自: 114.42.11.118 (05/02 12:50)
→
05/02 12:48, , 19F
05/02 12:48, 19F
推
05/02 12:48, , 20F
05/02 12:48, 20F
→
05/02 12:48, , 21F
05/02 12:48, 21F
→
05/02 12:48, , 22F
05/02 12:48, 22F
噓
05/02 12:48, , 23F
05/02 12:48, 23F
噓
05/02 12:48, , 24F
05/02 12:48, 24F
→
05/02 12:49, , 25F
05/02 12:49, 25F
→
05/02 12:49, , 26F
05/02 12:49, 26F
推
05/02 12:49, , 27F
05/02 12:49, 27F
→
05/02 12:49, , 28F
05/02 12:49, 28F
→
05/02 12:49, , 29F
05/02 12:49, 29F
推
05/02 12:49, , 30F
05/02 12:49, 30F
→
05/02 12:49, , 31F
05/02 12:49, 31F
推
05/02 12:49, , 32F
05/02 12:49, 32F
噓
05/02 12:50, , 33F
05/02 12:50, 33F
我哪裡拿Lin跟西河 rondo比較了XDDD
講實在一點啦 Lin的實力不足以影響到球隊運作 但雷霆少了西河會
但是Lin缺陣也是對球隊有影響
最好兩場沒上球隊贏這樣就算毒瘤
噓
05/02 12:50, , 34F
05/02 12:50, 34F
※ 編輯: ghghfftjack 來自: 114.42.11.118 (05/02 12:52)
還有 132 則推文
還有 6 段內文
→
05/02 13:23, , 167F
05/02 13:23, 167F
→
05/02 13:23, , 168F
05/02 13:23, 168F
※ 編輯: ghghfftjack 來自: 114.42.11.118 (05/02 13:25)
→
05/02 13:23, , 169F
05/02 13:23, 169F
→
05/02 13:24, , 170F
05/02 13:24, 170F
→
05/02 13:25, , 171F
05/02 13:25, 171F
推
05/02 13:26, , 172F
05/02 13:26, 172F
推
05/02 13:27, , 173F
05/02 13:27, 173F
推
05/02 13:33, , 174F
05/02 13:33, 174F
推
05/02 13:34, , 175F
05/02 13:34, 175F
→
05/02 13:35, , 176F
05/02 13:35, 176F
推
05/02 13:46, , 177F
05/02 13:46, 177F
噓
05/02 13:49, , 178F
05/02 13:49, 178F
→
05/02 13:49, , 179F
05/02 13:49, 179F
噓
05/02 13:49, , 180F
05/02 13:49, 180F
→
05/02 13:49, , 181F
05/02 13:49, 181F
→
05/02 13:50, , 182F
05/02 13:50, 182F
推
05/02 13:51, , 183F
05/02 13:51, 183F
推
05/02 13:51, , 184F
05/02 13:51, 184F
→
05/02 14:02, , 185F
05/02 14:02, 185F
噓
05/02 14:09, , 186F
05/02 14:09, 186F
推
05/02 14:16, , 187F
05/02 14:16, 187F
→
05/02 14:54, , 188F
05/02 14:54, 188F
→
05/02 14:59, , 189F
05/02 14:59, 189F
推
05/02 15:10, , 190F
05/02 15:10, 190F
噓
05/02 15:36, , 191F
05/02 15:36, 191F
噓
05/02 17:24, , 192F
05/02 17:24, 192F
推
05/02 17:26, , 193F
05/02 17:26, 193F
推
05/02 17:35, , 194F
05/02 17:35, 194F
→
05/02 17:36, , 195F
05/02 17:36, 195F
→
05/02 17:37, , 196F
05/02 17:37, 196F
噓
05/02 17:59, , 197F
05/02 17:59, 197F
推
05/02 18:34, , 198F
05/02 18:34, 198F
推
05/02 18:37, , 199F
05/02 18:37, 199F
推
05/02 18:43, , 200F
05/02 18:43, 200F
→
05/02 18:44, , 201F
05/02 18:44, 201F
推
05/02 20:08, , 202F
05/02 20:08, 202F
推
05/02 23:18, , 203F
05/02 23:18, 203F
推
05/03 09:43, , 204F
05/03 09:43, 204F
推
05/03 10:33, , 205F
05/03 10:33, 205F
討論串 (同標題文章)