[外絮] 如果kobe是教練已回收
If you're a fan of the Los Angeles Lakers or you happen to spend a lot of
time around Lakers fans, chances are that in the last two years, either you
or someone you know has joked that the Lakers might as well just make Kobe
Bryant their head coach.
But what if it actually happened?
What if, after the Lakers fired Mike Brown five games into the season, Jim
Buss said, "There's no way I'm bringing Phil back. There's no one else who
can come in and turn this thing around on the fly. I don't want to pay an
overmatched coach while I'm still paying the guy I just canned. Screw it,
let's just let Kobe coach the team!"?
It's a fantastical scenario, to be sure, but let's flesh it out just for
kicks. No doubt the Lakers would be a far different team than they are now,
but would it be for better or for worse?
Here's how the Lakers would look if Kobe got to channel his inner Bill
Russell and be L.A.'s player-coach for this season. (Also, get ready for the
most candid coaching interviews you've ever seen.)
1. Slow the Game Down
What have we been hearing (and seeing) all year? The Lakers are old and slow.
Kobe knows this better than anyone, and though he's given us some flashbacks
to his athletic peak, Bryant doesn't crave the up-tempo pace coach Mike
D'Antoni has installed.
Just look at the way he plays. Rarely does Bryant catch the ball and fire
away. Rather, he takes a couple seconds to survey the defense before going on
the attack.
The Lakers give up the second-most fast break points in the league.
As a team, the Lakers currently rank fourth in the NBA in pace.
But why?
There's no point in pushing the tempo when you don't have the horses to run
with your opponent. How many times this year have we witnessed Ty Lawson or
James Harden or Russell Westbrook sail coast to coast for an easy layup after
made baskets?
Los Angeles' advantage is their size. Their roster composition is much more
similar to the Memphis Grizzlies (28th in pace) than the Houston Rockets (No.
1 in pace), so why do they try to speed the game up like the latter?
2. Play Through the Post
The best way to slow the game down is to run your offense through the post
instead of jacking the first available three-point attempt. Fortunately, the
Lakers are blessed with two of the best post players in the league in Bryant
and Pau Gasol.
Most likely, the very first change Coach Bryant makes would be to tailor the
offense to a pound-it-down-low inside-out style.
Bryant loves operating out of the post. According to MySynergySports, he
makes nearly 55 percent of his field goals in post-up situations and ranks
eighth in points per possession on post-ups.
Gasol also excels at playing with his back to the basket, though the numbers
haven't bore that out this season. (Then again, none of Gasol's numbers in
2013 bear any resemblance to the rest of his career.) He could also function
as a brilliant facilitator from the elbow the way his brother Marc does in
Memphis.
Bryant would want to play out of the post as much as possible to exploit
L.A.'s size advantage.
Stephen Dunn/Getty Images
A perfect set that Bryant could get the Lakers in is Gasol with the ball at
the right elbow throwing an entry pass to Kobe on the right block. Steve Nash
and Shooter X would be stationed behind the three-point arc on the left side
of the floor with Dwight Howard floating on that side as well.
With the right side of the court cleared, Bryant could go to work one-on-one
against his defender. Depending on where the help comes from, Kobe would have
countless options to go to from there.
Gasol could be open at the elbow for a makeable jumper. Howard could dart to
the hoop, either for a lob from Bryant or a quick high-low from Gasol if the
first pass goes to the elbow. Howard could also set a back screen for a
weak-side shooter for an open three off a cross-court laser from Bryant.
In a system like that (supplemented of course with pick-and-rolls and some
brainy Steve Nash probes), the Lakers would grind down the other team
possession after possession 24 seconds at a time, without getting into
up-and-down sprints they don't have the legs for.
3. No More Third-Quarter Meltdowns
The Lakers have a tendency to come out flat for the second half. That
shouldn't happen because the second quarter has been their worst quarter of
the season, meaning there's usually a need for urgency right after halftime.
And yet, they've been outscored by their opponents in the third quarter for
the season.
Could the Lakers ever live up to Coach Bryant's demands?
Christian Petersen/Getty Images
There's no way that happens if Kobe Bryant is the boss. Can you imagine how
frightening a place the Lakers locker room would be if L.A. went into
halftime after a typically disappointing second period?
Right now Bryant is only responsible for himself, but if it was his job to
get his teammates going and make sure they were doing what he demanded of
them, then some arenas might need to remodel their away facilities after the
Lakers blow through town.
I'm saying there's even odds that Bryant would bring Dwight Howard to tears
at least once after a listless first-half performance.
------
大意
如果KOBE變成教練,會發生以下的情況
1.把比賽的節奏放慢
這一年來似乎常常聽到這個論點? 湖人隊既老又慢,kobe是最了解這件事的人
雖然KOBE這季回春,但他仍然不希望打冷笑話的快節奏比賽
看看KOBE現在是如何打球的,他很少接到球就直接射了
他在進攻之前會花幾秒鐘去解讀防守者
湖人的被快攻失分在聯盟裡排第二 團隊進攻節奏排第四
但這是為何?
當速度比不上對手時,為何還要加快節奏?
今年多少次看到Ty Lawson or James Harden or Russell Westbrook
輕易快攻上籃取分?
湖人隊的優勢在於體型及身高,類似灰熊,不過灰熊進攻節奏是聯盟28名
而湖人隊打得比較像是聯盟進攻節奏最快的火箭
2.經由低位發動攻勢
將節奏慢下來的最好方法就是經由低位發動進攻,
而湖人隊有兩位聯盟最佳的低位進攻者 KOBE & GASOL
KOBE成為教練後第一個最有可能的改變是將進攻節奏放慢然後主打禁區inside-out
根據MySynergySports的統計,KOBE很喜歡低位進攻,他有大約55%的FG是經低位進攻
而他在低位進攻的效率排名第八
3.不會再出現下半場的崩盤
湖人隊這季打最差的是第二節 然後常在下半場崩盤
這表示他們在中場休息時並沒有有效率的去解決這個問題
如果KOBE當教練的話,這件事就不會發生
你能想像如果KOBE當教練 而湖人隊像現在這樣打出令人失望的第二節後
休息室的氣氛會多可怕嗎
現在的KOBE只對自己負責 但當他當教練時他會要求全部的人作到他的標準
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1588299-what-la-lakers-would-look-like-if-kobe-bryant-was-coach
---
心得:如果KOBE當教練 以後別隊就不能嗆 叫你總仔出來啪了.....
說不定他真的會出來打(?)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 220.141.127.241
推
04/03 14:59, , 1F
04/03 14:59, 1F
推
04/03 14:59, , 2F
04/03 14:59, 2F
→
04/03 14:59, , 3F
04/03 14:59, 3F
推
04/03 15:00, , 4F
04/03 15:00, 4F
推
04/03 15:00, , 5F
04/03 15:00, 5F
推
04/03 15:01, , 6F
04/03 15:01, 6F
※ 編輯: yeo12 來自: 220.141.127.241 (04/03 15:01)
噓
04/03 15:02, , 7F
04/03 15:02, 7F
→
04/03 15:02, , 8F
04/03 15:02, 8F
推
04/03 15:02, , 9F
04/03 15:02, 9F
推
04/03 15:02, , 10F
04/03 15:02, 10F
推
04/03 15:03, , 11F
04/03 15:03, 11F
推
04/03 15:03, , 12F
04/03 15:03, 12F
推
04/03 15:03, , 13F
04/03 15:03, 13F
推
04/03 15:04, , 14F
04/03 15:04, 14F
推
04/03 15:04, , 15F
04/03 15:04, 15F
推
04/03 15:04, , 16F
04/03 15:04, 16F
→
04/03 15:04, , 17F
04/03 15:04, 17F
噓
04/03 15:05, , 18F
04/03 15:05, 18F
噓
04/03 15:06, , 19F
04/03 15:06, 19F
推
04/03 15:07, , 20F
04/03 15:07, 20F
噓
04/03 15:09, , 21F
04/03 15:09, 21F
→
04/03 15:10, , 22F
04/03 15:10, 22F
→
04/03 15:10, , 23F
04/03 15:10, 23F
推
04/03 15:12, , 24F
04/03 15:12, 24F
推
04/03 15:15, , 25F
04/03 15:15, 25F
→
04/03 15:15, , 26F
04/03 15:15, 26F
推
04/03 15:16, , 27F
04/03 15:16, 27F
噓
04/03 15:21, , 28F
04/03 15:21, 28F
推
04/03 15:28, , 29F
04/03 15:28, 29F
→
04/03 15:29, , 30F
04/03 15:29, 30F
推
04/03 15:41, , 31F
04/03 15:41, 31F
推
04/03 16:49, , 32F
04/03 16:49, 32F
推
04/03 17:06, , 33F
04/03 17:06, 33F
→
04/03 17:41, , 34F
04/03 17:41, 34F
推
04/03 20:06, , 35F
04/03 20:06, 35F
推
04/03 20:15, , 36F
04/03 20:15, 36F
→
04/03 23:02, , 37F
04/03 23:02, 37F
推
04/04 13:48, , 38F
04/04 13:48, 38F
推
04/05 18:27, , 39F
04/05 18:27, 39F