Re: [討論] 關於歷史成就,個人覺得應看(F)MVP才合理已回收
: MVP FMVP 總數 第一 前三 前五 前10 前15 前20
: Russell 5 + ? = 5 (3)
: Chamberlain 4 + 1 = 5 (5)
: Unseld 1 + 1 = 2 (20)
: B.Walton 1 + 1 = 2 (20)
: Jabbar 6 + 2 = 8 (3)
: Reed 1 + 2 = 3 (15)
: M.Malone 2 + 1 = 3 (15)
: Bird 3 + 2 = 5 (10)
: Magic 3 + 3 = 6 (5)
: Olajuwon 1 + 2 = 3 (15)
: Jordan 5 + 6 = 11 (1)
: O'neal 1 + 3 = 4 (10)
: Duncan 2 + 3 = 5 (10)
: Dirk 1 + 1 = 2 (20)
: Kobe 1 + 2 = 3 (15)
: LBJ 3 + 1 = 4 (10)
: Duncan的歷史地位應該比KG更高,KG大概是歷史前20名,TD至少前10
按照你的標準,這邊就有16個人,那KG還有前20名,仔細想一想,ESPN過去也排名過,
光是老馬,一冠都沒有就有資格跟4個冠軍的TD去拚誰是史上最強大前鋒,所以老馬前20
應該毫無疑問,再來就是大O,沒道理KG一個MVP跟一個冠軍可以入選前20名,大O不行?
除了他以外,海軍上將一個MVP跟兩個冠軍,也沒道理在KG之下.........
接著是笑笑湯,笑笑湯還擋下過MJ,另外更有兩個冠軍戒跟一個FMVP,沒道理更在KG下,
還有無冕王的老史,但是排在他前面的控球大概也就魔術,大O還有笑笑湯,
你要是覺得國外的人也都認為老史的成就跟偉大低於KG,那我也沒辦法.....
那退萬步來講,按照你的邏輯,戒指不代表什麼,KG無論怎麼看都只有一個MVP,
那跟KG平起平坐的人就真的很多了,還有如果LBJ如果就真的只有一冠,然後6個MVP,
我想是很難講他的成就超越大歐或是大鳥之類,因為只有一冠或是0冠不管例行賽再怎麼
好都只是令人惋惜,這也就是老史永遠跟老馬,都會被評價在TD或是魔術之下的一個重要
原因........
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.42.243.201
推
02/15 22:52, , 1F
02/15 22:52, 1F
推
02/15 22:53, , 2F
02/15 22:53, 2F
推
02/15 22:55, , 3F
02/15 22:55, 3F
→
02/15 22:56, , 4F
02/15 22:56, 4F
→
02/15 22:56, , 5F
02/15 22:56, 5F
→
02/15 22:56, , 6F
02/15 22:56, 6F
→
02/15 22:56, , 7F
02/15 22:56, 7F
→
02/15 22:57, , 8F
02/15 22:57, 8F
→
02/15 22:58, , 9F
02/15 22:58, 9F
→
02/15 22:58, , 10F
02/15 22:58, 10F
→
02/15 22:58, , 11F
02/15 22:58, 11F
推
02/15 22:58, , 12F
02/15 22:58, 12F
→
02/15 22:58, , 13F
02/15 22:58, 13F
→
02/15 22:59, , 14F
02/15 22:59, 14F
→
02/15 22:59, , 15F
02/15 22:59, 15F
→
02/15 22:59, , 16F
02/15 22:59, 16F
→
02/15 23:03, , 17F
02/15 23:03, 17F
→
02/15 23:04, , 18F
02/15 23:04, 18F
→
02/15 23:07, , 19F
02/15 23:07, 19F
→
02/15 23:13, , 20F
02/15 23:13, 20F
→
02/15 23:14, , 21F
02/15 23:14, 21F
推
02/15 23:14, , 22F
02/15 23:14, 22F
→
02/15 23:16, , 23F
02/15 23:16, 23F
→
02/15 23:17, , 24F
02/15 23:17, 24F
→
02/15 23:17, , 25F
02/15 23:17, 25F
→
02/15 23:17, , 26F
02/15 23:17, 26F
→
02/15 23:18, , 27F
02/15 23:18, 27F
推
02/15 23:19, , 28F
02/15 23:19, 28F
→
02/15 23:19, , 29F
02/15 23:19, 29F
推
02/15 23:19, , 30F
02/15 23:19, 30F
→
02/15 23:21, , 31F
02/15 23:21, 31F
→
02/15 23:21, , 32F
02/15 23:21, 32F
→
02/15 23:22, , 33F
02/15 23:22, 33F
→
02/15 23:22, , 34F
02/15 23:22, 34F
→
02/15 23:23, , 35F
02/15 23:23, 35F
→
02/15 23:23, , 36F
02/15 23:23, 36F
噓
02/15 23:26, , 37F
02/15 23:26, 37F
噓
02/15 23:28, , 38F
02/15 23:28, 38F
→
02/15 23:28, , 39F
02/15 23:28, 39F
→
02/15 23:29, , 40F
02/15 23:29, 40F
→
02/15 23:29, , 41F
02/15 23:29, 41F
推
02/15 23:30, , 42F
02/15 23:30, 42F
→
02/15 23:32, , 43F
02/15 23:32, 43F
→
02/15 23:33, , 44F
02/15 23:33, 44F
→
02/15 23:35, , 45F
02/15 23:35, 45F
推
02/15 23:35, , 46F
02/15 23:35, 46F
噓
02/15 23:35, , 47F
02/15 23:35, 47F
→
02/15 23:35, , 48F
02/15 23:35, 48F
→
02/15 23:36, , 49F
02/15 23:36, 49F
→
02/15 23:36, , 50F
02/15 23:36, 50F
→
02/15 23:37, , 51F
02/15 23:37, 51F
→
02/15 23:37, , 52F
02/15 23:37, 52F
推
02/15 23:37, , 53F
02/15 23:37, 53F
推
02/15 23:38, , 54F
02/15 23:38, 54F
推
02/15 23:38, , 55F
02/15 23:38, 55F
噓
02/15 23:38, , 56F
02/15 23:38, 56F
→
02/15 23:39, , 57F
02/15 23:39, 57F
推
02/15 23:39, , 58F
02/15 23:39, 58F
推
02/15 23:40, , 59F
02/15 23:40, 59F
噓
02/15 23:40, , 60F
02/15 23:40, 60F
→
02/15 23:41, , 61F
02/15 23:41, 61F
噓
02/15 23:43, , 62F
02/15 23:43, 62F
→
02/15 23:43, , 63F
02/15 23:43, 63F
→
02/16 00:05, , 64F
02/16 00:05, 64F
→
02/16 00:05, , 65F
02/16 00:05, 65F
→
02/16 00:06, , 66F
02/16 00:06, 66F
→
02/16 00:06, , 67F
02/16 00:06, 67F
→
02/16 00:07, , 68F
02/16 00:07, 68F
→
02/16 01:20, , 69F
02/16 01:20, 69F
推
02/16 02:32, , 70F
02/16 02:32, 70F
推
02/16 02:53, , 71F
02/16 02:53, 71F
→
02/16 02:53, , 72F
02/16 02:53, 72F
→
02/16 02:54, , 73F
02/16 02:54, 73F
→
02/16 02:54, , 74F
02/16 02:54, 74F
→
02/16 02:54, , 75F
02/16 02:54, 75F
→
02/16 02:57, , 76F
02/16 02:57, 76F
推
02/16 02:57, , 77F
02/16 02:57, 77F
推
02/16 03:32, , 78F
02/16 03:32, 78F
→
02/16 03:33, , 79F
02/16 03:33, 79F
推
02/16 03:36, , 80F
02/16 03:36, 80F
→
02/16 03:36, , 81F
02/16 03:36, 81F
推
02/16 13:16, , 82F
02/16 13:16, 82F
噓
02/19 22:16, , 83F
02/19 22:16, 83F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):