Re: [討論] Beasley有比Durant高?已回收
http://ppt.cc/eBB~
“I wanted to learn it because I’m 6-9…
“…because I’m 6-9…”
“…6-9…”
KD堅持自己是6-9
“Probably 6-11,” said backup point guard Reggie Jackson,
who is a legitimate 6-foot-3. “I don’t want to boost his
ego too much. He’s not 6-9. I’ll say 6-10 1/2, in shorts.”
Reggie Jackson猜KD穿鞋是6-10 1/2
Reserve guard Eric Maynor was the only Thunder to peg Durant
at 7-foot, then he looked over at 7-foot-3 center Hasheem
Thabeet and said of Durant’s mysterious height, “7-3?”
Maynor先猜7-0,不過看到Thabeet後改口說該不會7-3吧? (XD)
“Six-10,” Thabeet said. “He’s not as tall as me.”
Russell Westbrook agreed with Thabeet: 6-10.
Westbrook和Thabeet都猜6-10
Center Kendrick Perkins looked over at Durant, who was
listening to music through his headphones a few stalls down,
smiled and said, “6-11,” which would put Durant an inch
above Perk’s scowl when face-to-face.
Perkins猜6-11
OK, coach Brooks, care to give your estimation, before and/or
after haircut?
“Six-10,” Brooks said, hardly convincingly. “Ish.”
教練問是理髮前還理髮後的身高? (XDDD) 他猜 6-10
※ 引述《McRoberts (麥克羅伯斯)》之銘言:
: 剛看昨天雷霆太陽高光 KD至少比Beasley高半顆頭
: 但是官方登記卻不是這麼一回事
: Durant 官方6-9
: http://www.nba.com/playerfile/kevin_durant/
: Beasley 官方6-10
: http://www.nba.com/playerfile/michael_beasley/
: 我想NBA都多大組織 登記身高好歹要有些公信力
: 不是完全只用球員報上來的就不進一步驗證吧
: 就算是新秀年的資料難道不用更新嗎?
: Amare的6-11也一樣很謎....
: http://www.nba.com/playerfile/amare_stoudemire/
: 話說溜馬的喬治有持續長高 本季就有更新6-10了
: 這三位中生代的不會永遠就這樣報吧?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 1.160.224.201
※ 編輯: yeeh 來自: 1.160.224.201 (02/12 17:20)
推
02/12 17:24, , 1F
02/12 17:24, 1F
推
02/12 17:28, , 2F
02/12 17:28, 2F
→
02/12 17:38, , 3F
02/12 17:38, 3F
推
02/12 17:39, , 4F
02/12 17:39, 4F
推
02/12 17:40, , 5F
02/12 17:40, 5F
→
02/12 17:41, , 6F
02/12 17:41, 6F
推
02/12 17:43, , 7F
02/12 17:43, 7F
推
02/12 17:44, , 8F
02/12 17:44, 8F
推
02/12 17:44, , 9F
02/12 17:44, 9F
推
02/12 17:49, , 10F
02/12 17:49, 10F
推
02/12 17:49, , 11F
02/12 17:49, 11F
推
02/12 17:50, , 12F
02/12 17:50, 12F
推
02/12 17:50, , 13F
02/12 17:50, 13F
→
02/12 17:51, , 14F
02/12 17:51, 14F
→
02/12 17:51, , 15F
02/12 17:51, 15F
推
02/12 17:52, , 16F
02/12 17:52, 16F
推
02/12 17:54, , 17F
02/12 17:54, 17F
推
02/12 17:54, , 18F
02/12 17:54, 18F
→
02/12 17:56, , 19F
02/12 17:56, 19F
→
02/12 17:57, , 20F
02/12 17:57, 20F
推
02/12 18:12, , 21F
02/12 18:12, 21F
推
02/12 18:16, , 22F
02/12 18:16, 22F
推
02/12 18:32, , 23F
02/12 18:32, 23F
推
02/12 18:39, , 24F
02/12 18:39, 24F
推
02/12 18:40, , 25F
02/12 18:40, 25F
推
02/12 18:45, , 26F
02/12 18:45, 26F
推
02/12 18:53, , 27F
02/12 18:53, 27F
推
02/12 19:05, , 28F
02/12 19:05, 28F
推
02/12 19:07, , 29F
02/12 19:07, 29F
推
02/12 20:27, , 30F
02/12 20:27, 30F
→
02/12 20:27, , 31F
02/12 20:27, 31F
→
02/12 20:27, , 32F
02/12 20:27, 32F
→
02/12 20:27, , 33F
02/12 20:27, 33F
推
02/12 20:47, , 34F
02/12 20:47, 34F
推
02/12 20:57, , 35F
02/12 20:57, 35F
推
02/12 22:03, , 36F
02/12 22:03, 36F
推
02/13 03:30, , 37F
02/13 03:30, 37F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):