Re: [轉錄][討論] Kidd本季的三分球 (無異議謾罵,先行鎖文!)
→
03/12 17:25,
03/12 17:25
→
03/12 17:41,
03/12 17:41
→
03/12 17:41,
03/12 17:41
其他恕刪
dmdjjj啊 別人只是想要「私心希望」
等於只是球迷的小小心願
你卻說「不用想了」 但對方只是表達希望而不是肯定說什麼KIDD FOR FINALS MVP!!!
這樣有值得你糾正他嗎?
另外 你的推文的兩個「一定」也有很大的問題
你我應該都知道凡事本來就沒有一定
特別是在單一系列賽
什麼都有可能發生
確實小牛如果得冠軍 基本上Dirk一定表現很好 也會是Finals MVP熱門人選
但這真的是定論嗎?
翻開NBA總冠軍戰歷史
其實也曾出現過副手奪MVP的情況
一般第一個會想到2007年的Tony Parker
馬刺是Duncan的球隊應該沒什麼異議吧?
而那年Finals Duncan也是繳出了18.3分11.5籃板的水準 稍遜於季賽的20分10.6籃板
但Parker在總冠軍戰就硬是拿下了24.5分5籃板3.3助攻 相對於季賽的18.6分5.5助攻
也順利的榮獲Finals MVP的頭銜
但說真的 這個例子我覺得還好
更適合的例子是1989年總冠軍-底特律活塞
雖然Joe Dumars是活塞隊的要角沒錯
但最指標性的超級球星還是Isiah Thomas 我想大家也不會有意見
那年Finals Thomas繳出了21.3分7.3助攻的成績
更勝於其季賽的18.2分8.3助攻
也順利帶領活塞隊橫掃湖人隊獲得總冠軍
所以Thomas理應獲頒Finals MVP...?
不 那年Finals MVP給了Joe Dumars
Joe Dumars季賽表現也不錯 17.2分5.7助攻的水準
但他老兄總冠軍戰就硬是轟下了27.3分6.0助攻的成績
不頒給他頒給誰?
講那麼多只是想表達
短短一個系列賽 真的沒有絕對
沒錯 Dirk如果打不好 基本上小牛很難冠軍
但如果Dirk表現良好 小牛也冠軍 你真的確定Dirk「一定」是Finals MVP
其他人選都「不用想了」?我看未必吧!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 220.136.173.79
推
03/13 00:13, , 1F
03/13 00:13, 1F
推
03/13 00:13, , 2F
03/13 00:13, 2F
→
03/13 00:13, , 3F
03/13 00:13, 3F
推
03/13 00:13, , 4F
03/13 00:13, 4F
推
03/13 00:14, , 5F
03/13 00:14, 5F
→
03/13 00:14, , 6F
03/13 00:14, 6F
→
03/13 00:15, , 7F
03/13 00:15, 7F
→
03/13 00:15, , 8F
03/13 00:15, 8F
→
03/13 00:16, , 9F
03/13 00:16, 9F
推
03/13 00:16, , 10F
03/13 00:16, 10F
→
03/13 00:16, , 11F
03/13 00:16, 11F
→
03/13 00:17, , 12F
03/13 00:17, 12F
→
03/13 00:17, , 13F
03/13 00:17, 13F
→
03/13 00:18, , 14F
03/13 00:18, 14F
推
03/13 00:18, , 15F
03/13 00:18, 15F
→
03/13 00:19, , 16F
03/13 00:19, 16F
推
03/13 00:19, , 17F
03/13 00:19, 17F
→
03/13 00:19, , 18F
03/13 00:19, 18F
推
03/13 00:19, , 19F
03/13 00:19, 19F
推
03/13 00:19, , 20F
03/13 00:19, 20F
→
03/13 00:21, , 21F
03/13 00:21, 21F
推
03/13 00:21, , 22F
03/13 00:21, 22F
推
03/13 00:21, , 23F
03/13 00:21, 23F
→
03/13 00:22, , 24F
03/13 00:22, 24F
→
03/13 00:22, , 25F
03/13 00:22, 25F
→
03/13 00:22, , 26F
03/13 00:22, 26F
→
03/13 00:23, , 27F
03/13 00:23, 27F
推
03/13 00:30, , 28F
03/13 00:30, 28F
推
03/13 00:30, , 29F
03/13 00:30, 29F
推
03/13 00:30, , 30F
03/13 00:30, 30F
→
03/13 00:31, , 31F
03/13 00:31, 31F
→
03/13 00:31, , 32F
03/13 00:31, 32F
→
03/13 00:31, , 33F
03/13 00:31, 33F
推
03/13 00:32, , 34F
03/13 00:32, 34F
推
03/13 00:32, , 35F
03/13 00:32, 35F
還有 48 則推文
→
03/13 00:43, , 84F
03/13 00:43, 84F
→
03/13 00:44, , 85F
03/13 00:44, 85F
→
03/13 00:44, , 86F
03/13 00:44, 86F
→
03/13 00:44, , 87F
03/13 00:44, 87F
→
03/13 00:44, , 88F
03/13 00:44, 88F
→
03/13 00:44, , 89F
03/13 00:44, 89F
推
03/13 00:45, , 90F
03/13 00:45, 90F
→
03/13 00:45, , 91F
03/13 00:45, 91F
→
03/13 00:45, , 92F
03/13 00:45, 92F
→
03/13 00:45, , 93F
03/13 00:45, 93F
→
03/13 00:45, , 94F
03/13 00:45, 94F
推
03/13 00:46, , 95F
03/13 00:46, 95F
推
03/13 00:46, , 96F
03/13 00:46, 96F
→
03/13 00:46, , 97F
03/13 00:46, 97F
噓
03/13 00:46, , 98F
03/13 00:46, 98F
推
03/13 00:46, , 99F
03/13 00:46, 99F
→
03/13 00:46, , 100F
03/13 00:46, 100F
→
03/13 00:47, , 101F
03/13 00:47, 101F
推
03/13 00:47, , 102F
03/13 00:47, 102F
推
03/13 00:47, , 103F
03/13 00:47, 103F
→
03/13 00:47, , 104F
03/13 00:47, 104F
噓
03/13 00:47, , 105F
03/13 00:47, 105F
→
03/13 00:47, , 106F
03/13 00:47, 106F
噓
03/13 00:47, , 107F
03/13 00:47, 107F
→
03/13 00:47, , 108F
03/13 00:47, 108F
→
03/13 00:47, , 109F
03/13 00:47, 109F
→
03/13 00:48, , 110F
03/13 00:48, 110F
→
03/13 00:48, , 111F
03/13 00:48, 111F
→
03/13 00:48, , 112F
03/13 00:48, 112F
→
03/13 00:48, , 113F
03/13 00:48, 113F
→
03/13 00:48, , 114F
03/13 00:48, 114F
→
03/13 00:48, , 115F
03/13 00:48, 115F
噓
03/13 00:48, , 116F
03/13 00:48, 116F
→
03/13 00:49, , 117F
03/13 00:49, 117F
→
03/13 00:49, , 118F
03/13 00:49, 118F
→
03/13 00:50, , 119F
03/13 00:50, 119F
→
03/13 00:50, , 120F
03/13 00:50, 120F
噓
03/13 00:50, , 121F
03/13 00:50, 121F
噓
03/13 00:51, , 122F
03/13 00:51, 122F
→
03/13 00:51, , 123F
03/13 00:51, 123F