Re: [討論] 觀念? 贏球?
推
10/09 20:35,
10/09 20:35
這場比賽該安打的球員有安打
該投好的新秀有投好
球員都很認真
至於林國裕跟大將軍 一個被操壞的 一個天花板就是這樣
沒有甚麼放水不放水的問題
這種消化比賽本來就是給潛力上場以及讓主力休息的時間
至於第三跟第四名 對球迷來說或許沒有甚麼
但對球團而言差異非常大
第三名既沒有優先選秀權 也沒有季後賽門票可以賺
可謂最慘的名次 本隊10年就是沒有觀念
某場比賽 以一分之差擊敗興農 勇奪第三wwwwwww
狀元有甚麼好處?
球團可以把想要的球員先請出來選秀 談好價格使用狀元籤簽下
今年天勇哥選秀會臉色多難看 我想大家都有看到 這就是選秀順位的差異
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.251.38.157
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Monkeys/M.1476018226.A.6F1.html
推
10/09 21:06, , 1F
10/09 21:06, 1F
推
10/09 21:10, , 2F
10/09 21:10, 2F
推
10/09 21:13, , 3F
10/09 21:13, 3F
修正一下 是10年XD 反正就是贏了反而更慘
推
10/09 21:15, , 4F
10/09 21:15, 4F
推
10/09 21:16, , 5F
10/09 21:16, 5F
那是在大家瞎子摸象沒有球探只有本隊有球探亂選的年代
現在大家都有球探了
順位差很多了www
推
10/09 21:17, , 6F
10/09 21:17, 6F
推
10/09 21:17, , 7F
10/09 21:17, 7F
推
10/09 21:17, , 8F
10/09 21:17, 8F
→
10/09 21:17, , 9F
10/09 21:17, 9F
推
10/09 21:17, , 10F
10/09 21:17, 10F
推
10/09 21:18, , 11F
10/09 21:18, 11F
→
10/09 21:18, , 12F
10/09 21:18, 12F
→
10/09 21:18, , 13F
10/09 21:18, 13F
→
10/09 21:18, , 14F
10/09 21:18, 14F
推
10/09 21:18, , 15F
10/09 21:18, 15F
→
10/09 21:19, , 16F
10/09 21:19, 16F
推
10/09 21:19, , 17F
10/09 21:19, 17F
推
10/09 21:19, , 18F
10/09 21:19, 18F
→
10/09 21:20, , 19F
10/09 21:20, 19F
推
10/09 21:20, , 20F
10/09 21:20, 20F
推
10/09 21:21, , 21F
10/09 21:21, 21F
→
10/09 21:21, , 22F
10/09 21:21, 22F
推
10/09 21:21, , 23F
10/09 21:21, 23F
→
10/09 21:21, , 24F
10/09 21:21, 24F
→
10/09 21:22, , 25F
10/09 21:22, 25F
→
10/09 21:22, , 26F
10/09 21:22, 26F
→
10/09 21:22, , 27F
10/09 21:22, 27F
→
10/09 21:23, , 28F
10/09 21:23, 28F
→
10/09 21:23, , 29F
10/09 21:23, 29F
→
10/09 21:23, , 30F
10/09 21:23, 30F
→
10/09 21:24, , 31F
10/09 21:24, 31F
今天這場還烤了香腸我有點傻眼 不過有可能是為了獎項或獎金吧 我猜
※ 編輯: T566 (111.251.38.157), 10/09/2016 21:25:23
推
10/09 21:24, , 32F
10/09 21:24, 32F
→
10/09 21:25, , 33F
10/09 21:25, 33F
推
10/09 21:26, , 34F
10/09 21:26, 34F
→
10/09 21:26, , 35F
10/09 21:26, 35F
→
10/09 21:26, , 36F
10/09 21:26, 36F
推
10/09 21:27, , 37F
10/09 21:27, 37F
→
10/09 21:27, , 38F
10/09 21:27, 38F
→
10/09 21:27, , 39F
10/09 21:27, 39F
→
10/09 21:28, , 40F
10/09 21:28, 40F
→
10/09 21:29, , 41F
10/09 21:29, 41F
推
10/09 21:30, , 42F
10/09 21:30, 42F
→
10/09 21:30, , 43F
10/09 21:30, 43F
→
10/09 21:31, , 44F
10/09 21:31, 44F
→
10/09 21:31, , 45F
10/09 21:31, 45F
→
10/09 21:31, , 46F
10/09 21:31, 46F
→
10/09 21:32, , 47F
10/09 21:32, 47F
推
10/09 21:32, , 48F
10/09 21:32, 48F
→
10/09 21:32, , 49F
10/09 21:32, 49F
推
10/09 21:32, , 50F
10/09 21:32, 50F
推
10/09 21:33, , 51F
10/09 21:33, 51F
→
10/09 21:33, , 52F
10/09 21:33, 52F
→
10/09 21:34, , 53F
10/09 21:34, 53F
推
10/09 21:34, , 54F
10/09 21:34, 54F
推
10/09 21:34, , 55F
10/09 21:34, 55F
→
10/09 21:35, , 56F
10/09 21:35, 56F
→
10/09 21:36, , 57F
10/09 21:36, 57F
→
10/09 21:36, , 58F
10/09 21:36, 58F
→
10/09 21:36, , 59F
10/09 21:36, 59F
→
10/09 21:37, , 60F
10/09 21:37, 60F
→
10/09 21:37, , 61F
10/09 21:37, 61F
推
10/09 21:37, , 62F
10/09 21:37, 62F
推
10/09 21:37, , 63F
10/09 21:37, 63F
推
10/09 21:38, , 64F
10/09 21:38, 64F
→
10/09 21:39, , 65F
10/09 21:39, 65F
→
10/09 21:39, , 66F
10/09 21:39, 66F
推
10/09 21:39, , 67F
10/09 21:39, 67F
→
10/09 21:40, , 68F
10/09 21:40, 68F
推
10/09 21:40, , 69F
10/09 21:40, 69F
→
10/09 21:40, , 70F
10/09 21:40, 70F
推
10/09 21:49, , 71F
10/09 21:49, 71F
→
10/09 21:50, , 72F
10/09 21:50, 72F
→
10/09 22:51, , 73F
10/09 22:51, 73F
→
10/09 22:51, , 74F
10/09 22:51, 74F
→
10/09 22:51, , 75F
10/09 22:51, 75F
→
10/09 22:52, , 76F
10/09 22:52, 76F
→
10/09 22:53, , 77F
10/09 22:53, 77F
推
10/09 22:58, , 78F
10/09 22:58, 78F
推
10/09 23:47, , 79F
10/09 23:47, 79F
推
10/10 08:52, , 80F
10/10 08:52, 80F
推
10/10 09:10, , 81F
10/10 09:10, 81F
討論串 (同標題文章)